Perception of Urban Leftover Spaces: A Comparative Study of Built Environment and Non-Built Environment Participants

Jasim Azhar, M. Gjerde, B. Vale, Muhammad Asif
{"title":"Perception of Urban Leftover Spaces: A Comparative Study of Built Environment and Non-Built Environment Participants","authors":"Jasim Azhar, M. Gjerde, B. Vale, Muhammad Asif","doi":"10.3390/architecture2020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The built environment, urban processes, and experience all work together to create the spatial environment of a city. Many urban spaces, especially those that appear to be ‘leftover’, do not reflect a set concept but are constantly questioned and recreated. Recognizing leftover spaces in an urban environment is an important aspect of the urban redevelopment process. Researchers have highlighted the difficulties, circumstances, and relevance of making good use of leftover space. To accomplish environmental and social benefits, these places can be created, changed, and incorporated into the main urban fabric; however, there is a scarcity of knowledge on how to go about constructing such environments. This study explores the visual perception of two groups of people, those with knowledge of the built environment and those with other educational backgrounds regarding leftover spaces in Wellington City. The research, which employs a mixed approach, consists of three studies, beginning with a visual preference study to better understand human perceptions, which might lead to better design solutions. The second study looked at differences in design preferences across the built environment and non-built environment participants. Finally, individuals from the built and non-built environments participants were invited to a focus group discussion for study three. To summarize, the findings demonstrated that adding vegetation is a crucial design feature. The findings refute the hypotheses of non-built environment specialists have different design perceptions for a built environment.","PeriodicalId":79561,"journal":{"name":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The built environment, urban processes, and experience all work together to create the spatial environment of a city. Many urban spaces, especially those that appear to be ‘leftover’, do not reflect a set concept but are constantly questioned and recreated. Recognizing leftover spaces in an urban environment is an important aspect of the urban redevelopment process. Researchers have highlighted the difficulties, circumstances, and relevance of making good use of leftover space. To accomplish environmental and social benefits, these places can be created, changed, and incorporated into the main urban fabric; however, there is a scarcity of knowledge on how to go about constructing such environments. This study explores the visual perception of two groups of people, those with knowledge of the built environment and those with other educational backgrounds regarding leftover spaces in Wellington City. The research, which employs a mixed approach, consists of three studies, beginning with a visual preference study to better understand human perceptions, which might lead to better design solutions. The second study looked at differences in design preferences across the built environment and non-built environment participants. Finally, individuals from the built and non-built environments participants were invited to a focus group discussion for study three. To summarize, the findings demonstrated that adding vegetation is a crucial design feature. The findings refute the hypotheses of non-built environment specialists have different design perceptions for a built environment.
城市剩余空间感知:建筑环境与非建筑环境参与者的比较研究
建筑环境、城市进程和体验共同创造了城市的空间环境。许多城市空间,特别是那些看似“剩余”的空间,并没有反映出既定的概念,而是不断受到质疑和重新创造。识别城市环境中的剩余空间是城市重建过程的一个重要方面。研究人员强调了充分利用剩余空间的困难、情况和相关性。为了实现环境和社会效益,这些地方可以被创造、改变并纳入主要的城市结构;然而,关于如何着手构建这样的环境的知识却十分匮乏。这项研究探讨了两组人的视觉感知,一组人对建筑环境有了解,另一组人对惠灵顿市的剩余空间有其他教育背景。这项研究采用了混合的方法,包括三项研究,首先是一项视觉偏好研究,以更好地理解人类的感知,这可能会带来更好的设计解决方案。第二项研究考察了建筑环境和非建筑环境参与者在设计偏好上的差异。最后,来自建成环境和非建成环境的参与者被邀请参加研究三的焦点小组讨论。总之,研究结果表明,增加植被是一个至关重要的设计特征。研究结果驳斥了非建筑环境专家对建筑环境有不同设计观念的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信