Bloodborne Pathogens in the Workplace

J. Yadav, R. Kapoor
{"title":"Bloodborne Pathogens in the Workplace","authors":"J. Yadav, R. Kapoor","doi":"10.1002/0471435139.TOX020.PUB2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational risk to healthcare workers from infections with bloodborne pathogens has been recognized since the mid-twentieth century. Early reports around 1950s on “serum hepatitis” subsequently led to identification of hepatitis B as the causative agent in the bloodborne infection. In the early 1970s, serological tests became available for the diagnosis of infection with both hepatitis B and hepatitis A viruses. Non-A, non-B hepatitis (hepatitis C) emerged as a second bloodborne infection but, because of the lack of a serologic marker, the prevalence of the disease and its occupational risks were not appreciated. With the identification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as the viral pathogen of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the mid-1980s, healthcare workers became very concerned about the occupational risk to HIV infections due to exposure to the infected patients. The potential occult infectivity of blood has been emphasized with the documentation of 57 occupationally transmitted infections with HIV-1 in the United States. Since the first occupational transmission was reported in 1984, healthcare and laboratory administrators, as well as those in the public sector, have reexamined the infection control aspects of their work practices and have begun to analyze and develop equipment and procedures to minimize exposures. While majority of the occupational infections in healthcare workers are due to the three bloodborne viruses, HBV, HCV, and HIV, any septicemic infection (viremia, parasitemia, bacteriemia, or fungemia) may pose a potential risk of transmission of the pathogen to healthcare professionals via either percutaneous route (needlestick or sharps injury) or mucocutaneous route (contact with nonintact skin or mucosa of the eyes or mouth). \n \n \n \nBecause infection with HIV and other bloodborne pathogens is not always clinically apparent, and the infectious potential of blood and other body fluids is not always known, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended “universal blood and body fluid precautions” in 1987. This approach emphasizes that blood and body fluid precautions should be consistently used for all patients and their clinical specimens and tissues. The “universal precautions” strategy has formed the foundation for federal guidelines through the CDC and regulations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Both organizations recognize that this practical approach to safety will not only minimize the risk of occupationally acquired HIV-1 infection but also serve to protect against occupational infection with other bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human T-cell leukemia viruses I and II, HIV-2, and, to a large extent, prions (agents causing Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease). Nonetheless, a substantial number of percutaneous exposures continue to occur in the healthcare setting, despite implementation of the universal precautions guidelines. \n \n \n \nThe risks to healthcare and laboratory workers are dynamic because of the availability of vaccines, antiviral treatment, and recognition of new agents and interactions with old ones. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide an overview of the epidemiology, risk of transmission, and the recommended or regulated strategies to prevent occupational transmission of viruses (HIV and hepatitis) and other bloodborne pathogens. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \nenvironmental survival; \nepidemiology; \nhepatitis B; \nhepatitis C; \nhuman immunodeficiency virus 1; \noccupational HIV-1 transmission; \npostexposure management; \nprecautions; \nprevention; \nretroviruses; \nrisk assessment","PeriodicalId":19820,"journal":{"name":"Patty's Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patty's Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/0471435139.TOX020.PUB2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational risk to healthcare workers from infections with bloodborne pathogens has been recognized since the mid-twentieth century. Early reports around 1950s on “serum hepatitis” subsequently led to identification of hepatitis B as the causative agent in the bloodborne infection. In the early 1970s, serological tests became available for the diagnosis of infection with both hepatitis B and hepatitis A viruses. Non-A, non-B hepatitis (hepatitis C) emerged as a second bloodborne infection but, because of the lack of a serologic marker, the prevalence of the disease and its occupational risks were not appreciated. With the identification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as the viral pathogen of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the mid-1980s, healthcare workers became very concerned about the occupational risk to HIV infections due to exposure to the infected patients. The potential occult infectivity of blood has been emphasized with the documentation of 57 occupationally transmitted infections with HIV-1 in the United States. Since the first occupational transmission was reported in 1984, healthcare and laboratory administrators, as well as those in the public sector, have reexamined the infection control aspects of their work practices and have begun to analyze and develop equipment and procedures to minimize exposures. While majority of the occupational infections in healthcare workers are due to the three bloodborne viruses, HBV, HCV, and HIV, any septicemic infection (viremia, parasitemia, bacteriemia, or fungemia) may pose a potential risk of transmission of the pathogen to healthcare professionals via either percutaneous route (needlestick or sharps injury) or mucocutaneous route (contact with nonintact skin or mucosa of the eyes or mouth). Because infection with HIV and other bloodborne pathogens is not always clinically apparent, and the infectious potential of blood and other body fluids is not always known, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended “universal blood and body fluid precautions” in 1987. This approach emphasizes that blood and body fluid precautions should be consistently used for all patients and their clinical specimens and tissues. The “universal precautions” strategy has formed the foundation for federal guidelines through the CDC and regulations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Both organizations recognize that this practical approach to safety will not only minimize the risk of occupationally acquired HIV-1 infection but also serve to protect against occupational infection with other bloodborne pathogens such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human T-cell leukemia viruses I and II, HIV-2, and, to a large extent, prions (agents causing Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease). Nonetheless, a substantial number of percutaneous exposures continue to occur in the healthcare setting, despite implementation of the universal precautions guidelines. The risks to healthcare and laboratory workers are dynamic because of the availability of vaccines, antiviral treatment, and recognition of new agents and interactions with old ones. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide an overview of the epidemiology, risk of transmission, and the recommended or regulated strategies to prevent occupational transmission of viruses (HIV and hepatitis) and other bloodborne pathogens. Keywords: environmental survival; epidemiology; hepatitis B; hepatitis C; human immunodeficiency virus 1; occupational HIV-1 transmission; postexposure management; precautions; prevention; retroviruses; risk assessment
工作场所的血源性病原体
自二十世纪中叶以来,卫生保健工作者因血源性病原体感染而面临的职业风险已得到确认。20世纪50年代关于“血清肝炎”的早期报告随后导致乙型肝炎被确定为血源性感染的病原体。在20世纪70年代早期,血清学测试可用于诊断乙型肝炎和甲型肝炎病毒感染。非甲、非乙型肝炎(丙型肝炎)作为第二种血源性感染出现,但由于缺乏血清学标志物,该疾病的患病率及其职业风险未得到充分认识。20世纪80年代中期,随着人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)被确定为获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)的病毒病原体,医护工作者因接触受感染患者而引起的HIV感染风险日益受到关注。在美国,57例职业传播感染HIV-1的病例强调了血液潜在的隐性感染性。自从1984年报告了第一例职业传播以来,保健和实验室管理人员以及公共部门的管理人员重新审查了其工作实践的感染控制方面,并开始分析和开发设备和程序,以尽量减少接触。虽然大多数卫生保健工作者的职业感染是由三种血源性病毒,HBV, HCV和HIV引起的,但任何败血症感染(病毒血症,寄生虫血症,细菌血症或真菌血症)都可能通过经皮途径(针刺或利器损伤)或粘膜皮肤途径(接触未完整的皮肤或眼睛或口腔粘膜)将病原体传播给卫生保健专业人员。由于艾滋病毒和其他血源性病原体的感染在临床上并不总是明显的,而且血液和其他体液的感染潜力并不总是已知的,疾病控制中心(CDC)在1987年推荐了“普遍的血液和体液预防措施”。这种方法强调对所有患者及其临床标本和组织应一贯使用血液和体液预防措施。“普遍预防”战略已经通过疾病预防控制中心和职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的规定形成了联邦指导方针的基础。两个组织都认识到,这种实用的安全方法不仅可以最大限度地减少职业获得性HIV-1感染的风险,而且还可以防止职业感染其他血源性病原体,如乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎、人类t细胞白血病病毒I和II、HIV-2,以及在很大程度上防止朊病毒(导致克雅氏病的病原体)。尽管如此,尽管实施了普遍预防指南,但在医疗保健环境中,仍有大量经皮暴露继续发生。由于疫苗的可获得性、抗病毒治疗、新药物的识别以及与旧药物的相互作用,卫生保健和实验室工作人员面临的风险是动态的。本章的目的是概述流行病学、传播风险以及预防病毒(艾滋病毒和肝炎)和其他血源性病原体职业传播的建议或监管策略。关键词:环境生存;流行病学;乙型肝炎;丙型肝炎;人类免疫缺陷病毒1型;HIV-1职业传播;曝光后管理;预防措施;预防;逆转录病毒;风险评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信