Tightening Up the Incentive Ratio for Resource Sharing Over the Rings

Y. Cheng, Xiaotie Deng, Yuhao Li
{"title":"Tightening Up the Incentive Ratio for Resource Sharing Over the Rings","authors":"Y. Cheng, Xiaotie Deng, Yuhao Li","doi":"10.1109/IPDPS47924.2020.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fundamental issues in resource sharing over large scale networks have gained much attention from the research community, in response to the growth of sharing economy over the Internet and mobile networks. We are particularly interested in the fundamental file sharing and subsequently P2P network bandwidth sharing developed by BitTorrent and later formalized by Wu and Zhang [15] as the proportional response protocol. It is of practical importance in the design to provide agent incentives to follow the distributed protocol out of their own rationality. We study the robustness of the distributed protocol in this incentive issue against a Sybil attack, a common type of grave threat in P2P network. For the resource sharing on rings, and we characterize the utility gain from a Sybil attack in the concept of incentive ratio. Previous works proved the incentive ratio is lower bounded by two and upper bounded by four, and later the upper bound is improved to three. It has been listed in [5] and [9] as an open problem to tighten them. In this paper, we completely resolve this open problem with a better understanding on the influence from different class agents to the resource allocation under the distributed protocol.","PeriodicalId":6805,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS47924.2020.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Fundamental issues in resource sharing over large scale networks have gained much attention from the research community, in response to the growth of sharing economy over the Internet and mobile networks. We are particularly interested in the fundamental file sharing and subsequently P2P network bandwidth sharing developed by BitTorrent and later formalized by Wu and Zhang [15] as the proportional response protocol. It is of practical importance in the design to provide agent incentives to follow the distributed protocol out of their own rationality. We study the robustness of the distributed protocol in this incentive issue against a Sybil attack, a common type of grave threat in P2P network. For the resource sharing on rings, and we characterize the utility gain from a Sybil attack in the concept of incentive ratio. Previous works proved the incentive ratio is lower bounded by two and upper bounded by four, and later the upper bound is improved to three. It has been listed in [5] and [9] as an open problem to tighten them. In this paper, we completely resolve this open problem with a better understanding on the influence from different class agents to the resource allocation under the distributed protocol.
收紧环上资源共享激励比例
随着互联网和移动网络上共享经济的发展,大规模网络资源共享的基本问题受到了学术界的广泛关注。我们特别感兴趣的是由BitTorrent开发的基础文件共享和随后的P2P网络带宽共享,后来由Wu和Zhang[15]形式化为比例响应协议。在分布式协议设计中,为智能体提供出于自身理性而遵循分布式协议的激励具有重要的现实意义。我们在这个激励问题中研究了分布式协议对Sybil攻击的鲁棒性,Sybil攻击是P2P网络中常见的一种严重威胁。对于环上的资源共享,我们用激励比率的概念描述了西比尔攻击的效用收益。以前的工作证明了激励比的下限为2,上限为4,后来将上限提高到3。它已被列为b[5]和[9]作为一个开放的问题来收紧他们。本文通过对分布式协议下不同类代理对资源分配的影响的更好理解,彻底解决了这一开放性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信