Effects on Soybean Growth and Yield of Wheat-Soybean Intercropping System

Fernando Ross, P. Abbate
{"title":"Effects on Soybean Growth and Yield of Wheat-Soybean Intercropping System","authors":"Fernando Ross, P. Abbate","doi":"10.24297/JAA.V9I0.7906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been demonstrated that soybean (Glycine max) produces lower yields at relay intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum) than if it is sown as a sole crop. However, most studies considered wider or irregular soybean row spacing, compromising its capacity to recover after wheat harvest. This work studied the stress effects in relay soybean intercropping and suggests narrowing row spacing to improve soybean performance. The aims were (i) to compare growth and yield of two planting patterns and (ii) to separate the effect of water stress (WS) from the effects of other stress factors (OSF) induced by wheat on intercropping soybean. WS was evaluated comparing above-ground dry and grain yield of irrigated and non irrigated intercropping soybean, and OSF was evaluated comparing intercropping soybean with another treatment in which wheat straw (aerial biomass) was eliminated at soybean emergence, both irrigated treatments. In wheat, similar yields were obtained in treatments with an intercropping planting pattern with two rows for wheat and one for soybean (2:1) compared to three rows for wheat and one row for soybean (3:1). However, intercropping soybean at narrow row spacing (52 cm; 2:1) improve yielded 23% more than intercropping at 70 cm (3:1). During wheat-soybean coexistence, OSF prevailed on soybean and this effect persisted in later stages. After wheat harvest, OSF reduced the amount of light interception from R1 to R5 and depressed the crop growth rate (CGR) in 34%. However, in this period, WS also affected the radiation use efficiencies (RUE) which explained the greater fraction (66%) of the total stress induced by wheat in soybean CGR. Intercrop soybean yielded 182 g m-2 less compared to the unstressed sole crop control. Considering the wheat effects on soybean growth, 63% (116.5 g m-2) of the total yield lost were due to WS. Therefore, most of the performance of relay intercropping soybean was linked with water disponibility since early stages. However, at optimum water condition wheat competition by light and resources also affected soybean yield (OSF: 37%).","PeriodicalId":14915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Agriculture","volume":"226 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24297/JAA.V9I0.7906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that soybean (Glycine max) produces lower yields at relay intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum) than if it is sown as a sole crop. However, most studies considered wider or irregular soybean row spacing, compromising its capacity to recover after wheat harvest. This work studied the stress effects in relay soybean intercropping and suggests narrowing row spacing to improve soybean performance. The aims were (i) to compare growth and yield of two planting patterns and (ii) to separate the effect of water stress (WS) from the effects of other stress factors (OSF) induced by wheat on intercropping soybean. WS was evaluated comparing above-ground dry and grain yield of irrigated and non irrigated intercropping soybean, and OSF was evaluated comparing intercropping soybean with another treatment in which wheat straw (aerial biomass) was eliminated at soybean emergence, both irrigated treatments. In wheat, similar yields were obtained in treatments with an intercropping planting pattern with two rows for wheat and one for soybean (2:1) compared to three rows for wheat and one row for soybean (3:1). However, intercropping soybean at narrow row spacing (52 cm; 2:1) improve yielded 23% more than intercropping at 70 cm (3:1). During wheat-soybean coexistence, OSF prevailed on soybean and this effect persisted in later stages. After wheat harvest, OSF reduced the amount of light interception from R1 to R5 and depressed the crop growth rate (CGR) in 34%. However, in this period, WS also affected the radiation use efficiencies (RUE) which explained the greater fraction (66%) of the total stress induced by wheat in soybean CGR. Intercrop soybean yielded 182 g m-2 less compared to the unstressed sole crop control. Considering the wheat effects on soybean growth, 63% (116.5 g m-2) of the total yield lost were due to WS. Therefore, most of the performance of relay intercropping soybean was linked with water disponibility since early stages. However, at optimum water condition wheat competition by light and resources also affected soybean yield (OSF: 37%).
小麦-大豆间作制度对大豆生长和产量的影响
已经证明,大豆(Glycine max)与小麦(Triticum aestivum)交替间作的产量比单独播种时要低。然而,大多数研究考虑较宽或不规则的大豆行距,影响其在小麦收获后的恢复能力。研究了大豆间作的胁迫效应,提出了缩小行距提高大豆生产性能的建议。研究的目的是:(1)比较两种种植模式下大豆的生长和产量;(2)区分水分胁迫(WS)和小麦诱导的其他胁迫因子(OSF)对间作大豆的影响。通过比较灌溉和非灌溉间作大豆的地上干量和籽粒产量来评估WS,并将间作大豆与另一种在大豆出苗期消除麦秸(空中生物量)的灌溉处理进行评估OSF。在小麦方面,采用小麦两行大豆一行(2:1)与小麦三行大豆一行(3:1)的间作种植模式获得的产量相似。窄行距间作大豆(52 cm;2:1)比套作在70 cm处增产23%(3:1)。在小麦-大豆共存过程中,OSF在大豆中占优势,并在后期持续存在。小麦收获后,OSF减少了R1到R5的光截获量,使作物生长速率(CGR)降低了34%。然而,在这一时期,WS也影响了辐射利用效率(RUE),这解释了大豆CGR中小麦诱导的总胁迫中较大比例(66%)的原因。间作大豆产量比未受胁迫的单作减少182克/平方米。考虑到小麦对大豆生长的影响,总产量损失的63% (116.5 g m-2)是由WS造成的。因此,从早期开始,间作大豆的大部分生产性能与水分耗散性有关。然而,在最佳水分条件下,小麦的光和资源竞争也影响大豆产量(OSF: 37%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书