Buprenorphine with, or without, Naloxone for Pregnant Women? - Review of Current Evidence and Practice in Massachusetts

Martin Kršák, P. Trowbridge, N. Regan, K. Freedman
{"title":"Buprenorphine with, or without, Naloxone for Pregnant Women? - Review of Current Evidence and Practice in Massachusetts","authors":"Martin Kršák, P. Trowbridge, N. Regan, K. Freedman","doi":"10.4172/2329-6488.1000269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opioid use disorder has reached the level of an epidemic. Potential complications of unsafe injections, lifestyle, overdose and withdrawal are particularly concerning in pregnant women as the risk therein extends also to the foetus. The main medications in treatment of opioid use disorder are methadone, naltrexone and buprenorphine products. Naloxone (pregnancy class: B) was carefully selected to be a part of Suboxone® in 4:1 ratio to buprenorphine (pregnancy class: C) as a deterrent for intravenous use. Naloxone's bioavailability, delivered sublingually, is minimal (<10%) yet there is a theoretical concern that a potential precipitated withdrawal could incite premature labor and fetal demise. For this reason, it is recommended that buprenorphine be used alone in this setting. However, a limited amount of data exists, showing relative safety of this combination in pregnant women when compared to other alternatives. Furthermore, current evidence in non-pregnant individuals shows that the risk of withdrawal due to naloxone is in most instances insignificant. The merit of adding naloxone as a disincentive for injecting opioids has been debated, yet the significance of preventing maternal and fetal exposures to the risk of blood stream infections, sepsis, blood-borne pathogens, bleeding and other complications is clear and warrants focused consideration. In Massachusetts, the state health insurer requires prior authorization for all forms of buprenorphine other than buprenorphine/naloxone combination films, which further complicates access to care specifically in pregnancy. Waiting periods and treatment interruptions rather than naloxone are thus much more likely to cause adverse outcomes in this population.","PeriodicalId":14921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alcoholism and drug dependence","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alcoholism and drug dependence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6488.1000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Opioid use disorder has reached the level of an epidemic. Potential complications of unsafe injections, lifestyle, overdose and withdrawal are particularly concerning in pregnant women as the risk therein extends also to the foetus. The main medications in treatment of opioid use disorder are methadone, naltrexone and buprenorphine products. Naloxone (pregnancy class: B) was carefully selected to be a part of Suboxone® in 4:1 ratio to buprenorphine (pregnancy class: C) as a deterrent for intravenous use. Naloxone's bioavailability, delivered sublingually, is minimal (<10%) yet there is a theoretical concern that a potential precipitated withdrawal could incite premature labor and fetal demise. For this reason, it is recommended that buprenorphine be used alone in this setting. However, a limited amount of data exists, showing relative safety of this combination in pregnant women when compared to other alternatives. Furthermore, current evidence in non-pregnant individuals shows that the risk of withdrawal due to naloxone is in most instances insignificant. The merit of adding naloxone as a disincentive for injecting opioids has been debated, yet the significance of preventing maternal and fetal exposures to the risk of blood stream infections, sepsis, blood-borne pathogens, bleeding and other complications is clear and warrants focused consideration. In Massachusetts, the state health insurer requires prior authorization for all forms of buprenorphine other than buprenorphine/naloxone combination films, which further complicates access to care specifically in pregnancy. Waiting periods and treatment interruptions rather than naloxone are thus much more likely to cause adverse outcomes in this population.
孕妇服用丁丙诺啡加或不加纳洛酮?-麻萨诸塞州现行证据与实践回顾
阿片类药物使用障碍已达到流行病的程度。不安全注射、生活方式、用药过量和停药的潜在并发症对孕妇尤其令人担忧,因为其中的风险也延伸到胎儿。治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的主要药物是美沙酮、纳曲酮和丁丙诺啡产品。纳洛酮(妊娠级:B)被精心挑选为Suboxone®的一部分,与丁丙诺啡(妊娠级:C)的比例为4:1,以防止静脉使用。纳洛酮的生物利用度,舌下给药,是最低的(<10%),但有一个理论上的担忧,潜在的沉淀停药可能会引发早产和胎儿死亡。因此,建议在这种情况下单独使用丁丙诺啡。然而,现有的有限数据表明,与其他替代方案相比,这种组合在孕妇中相对安全。此外,目前在非怀孕个体中的证据表明,在大多数情况下,纳洛酮引起的停药风险微不足道。添加纳洛酮作为注射阿片类药物的抑制因素的优点一直存在争议,但预防孕产妇和胎儿暴露于血流感染、败血症、血源性病原体、出血和其他并发症风险的重要性是明确的,值得重点考虑。在麻萨诸塞州,除了丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮复合片外,所有形式的丁丙诺啡都需要事先获得保险公司的批准,这进一步使孕妇获得护理变得更加复杂。因此,在这一人群中,等待期和治疗中断比纳洛酮更有可能导致不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书