{"title":"A remote field course implementing high-resolution topography acquisition with geomorphic applications","authors":"S. Bywater‐Reyes, B. Pratt-Sitaula","doi":"10.5194/gc-5-101-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Here we describe the curriculum and outcomes from a data-intensive\ngeomorphic analysis course, “Geoscience Field Issues Using High-Resolution\nTopography to Understand Earth Surface Processes”, which pivoted to virtual\nin 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The curriculum covers technologies for\nmanual and remotely sensed topographic data methods, including (1) Global\nPositioning Systems and Global Navigation Satellite System (GPS/GNSS)\nsurveys, (2) Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry, and (3) ground-based\n(terrestrial laser scanning, TLS) and airborne lidar. Course content focuses\non Earth-surface process applications but could be adapted for other\ngeoscience disciplines. Many other field courses were canceled in summer\n2020, so this course served a broad range of undergraduate and graduate\nstudents in need of a field course as part of degree or research\nrequirements. Resulting curricular materials are available freely within the\nNational Association of Geoscience Teachers' (NAGT's) “Teaching with Online Field Experiences” collection. The\nauthors pre-collected GNSS data, uncrewed-aerial-system-derived (UAS-derived) photographs, and ground-based lidar, which students then used in course\nassignments. The course was run over a 2-week period and had synchronous\nand asynchronous components. Students created SfM models that incorporated\npost-processed GNSS ground control points and created derivative SfM and TLS\nproducts, including classified point clouds and digital elevation models\n(DEMs). Students were successfully able to (1) evaluate the appropriateness\nof a given survey/data approach given site conditions, (2) assess pros and\ncons of different data collection and post-processing methods in light of\nfield and time constraints and limitations of each, (3) conduct error and\ngeomorphic change analysis, and (4) propose or implement a protocol to answer\na geomorphic question. Overall, our analysis indicates the course had a\nsuccessful implementation that met student needs as well as course-specific\nand NAGT learning outcomes, with 91 % of students receiving an A, B, or C\ngrade. Unexpected outcomes of the course included student self-reflection\nand redirection and classmate support through a daily reflection and\ndiscussion post. Challenges included long hours in front of a computer,\ncomputing limitations, and burnout because of the condensed nature of the\ncourse. Recommended implementation improvements include spreading the course\nout over a longer period of time or adopting only part of the course and\nproviding appropriate computers and technical assistance. This paper\nand published curricular materials should serve as an implementation and\nassessment guide for the geoscience community to use in virtual or in-person\nhigh-resolution topographic data courses that can be adapted for individual\nlabs or for an entire field or data course.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-101-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Here we describe the curriculum and outcomes from a data-intensive
geomorphic analysis course, “Geoscience Field Issues Using High-Resolution
Topography to Understand Earth Surface Processes”, which pivoted to virtual
in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The curriculum covers technologies for
manual and remotely sensed topographic data methods, including (1) Global
Positioning Systems and Global Navigation Satellite System (GPS/GNSS)
surveys, (2) Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry, and (3) ground-based
(terrestrial laser scanning, TLS) and airborne lidar. Course content focuses
on Earth-surface process applications but could be adapted for other
geoscience disciplines. Many other field courses were canceled in summer
2020, so this course served a broad range of undergraduate and graduate
students in need of a field course as part of degree or research
requirements. Resulting curricular materials are available freely within the
National Association of Geoscience Teachers' (NAGT's) “Teaching with Online Field Experiences” collection. The
authors pre-collected GNSS data, uncrewed-aerial-system-derived (UAS-derived) photographs, and ground-based lidar, which students then used in course
assignments. The course was run over a 2-week period and had synchronous
and asynchronous components. Students created SfM models that incorporated
post-processed GNSS ground control points and created derivative SfM and TLS
products, including classified point clouds and digital elevation models
(DEMs). Students were successfully able to (1) evaluate the appropriateness
of a given survey/data approach given site conditions, (2) assess pros and
cons of different data collection and post-processing methods in light of
field and time constraints and limitations of each, (3) conduct error and
geomorphic change analysis, and (4) propose or implement a protocol to answer
a geomorphic question. Overall, our analysis indicates the course had a
successful implementation that met student needs as well as course-specific
and NAGT learning outcomes, with 91 % of students receiving an A, B, or C
grade. Unexpected outcomes of the course included student self-reflection
and redirection and classmate support through a daily reflection and
discussion post. Challenges included long hours in front of a computer,
computing limitations, and burnout because of the condensed nature of the
course. Recommended implementation improvements include spreading the course
out over a longer period of time or adopting only part of the course and
providing appropriate computers and technical assistance. This paper
and published curricular materials should serve as an implementation and
assessment guide for the geoscience community to use in virtual or in-person
high-resolution topographic data courses that can be adapted for individual
labs or for an entire field or data course.