Adhesion to pulp chamber dentin: Effect of different endodontic irrigants

R. Nagpal, Payal Singh, Shipra Singh, N. Manuja, Rahul Gupta, Pallavi Sharma
{"title":"Adhesion to pulp chamber dentin: Effect of different endodontic irrigants","authors":"R. Nagpal, Payal Singh, Shipra Singh, N. Manuja, Rahul Gupta, Pallavi Sharma","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.180994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effect of different endodontic irrigation regimens on the sealing ability of resin composite restorations placed within the pulp chamber using contemporary simplified adhesives. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five extracted human molars were divided into six groups. After de-roofing the pulp chamber and extirpating the pulp, pulp chambers were bonded with either G-Bond after irrigation with saline (Group 1); ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Group 2), and NaOCl + QMix (Group 3) or bonded with OptiBond adhesive after irrigation with saline (Group 4), EDTA and NaOCl (Group 5), and NaOCl + QMix (Group 6). All the samples were restored with composite. Ten samples per group were assessed for dye penetration. Fifteen samples were assessed under scanning electron microscope. Data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Both EDTA + NaOCl or NaOCl + QMix pretreatment of pulp chamber dentin significantly reduced microleakage scores in adhesive OptiBond, but did not affect the microleakage of G-Bond. Conclusions: EDTA + NaOCl or NaOCl + QMix irrigation of the pulp chamber was not deleterious to the bonding of any of the adhesives tested.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"55 1","pages":"53 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.180994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different endodontic irrigation regimens on the sealing ability of resin composite restorations placed within the pulp chamber using contemporary simplified adhesives. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five extracted human molars were divided into six groups. After de-roofing the pulp chamber and extirpating the pulp, pulp chambers were bonded with either G-Bond after irrigation with saline (Group 1); ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Group 2), and NaOCl + QMix (Group 3) or bonded with OptiBond adhesive after irrigation with saline (Group 4), EDTA and NaOCl (Group 5), and NaOCl + QMix (Group 6). All the samples were restored with composite. Ten samples per group were assessed for dye penetration. Fifteen samples were assessed under scanning electron microscope. Data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Both EDTA + NaOCl or NaOCl + QMix pretreatment of pulp chamber dentin significantly reduced microleakage scores in adhesive OptiBond, but did not affect the microleakage of G-Bond. Conclusions: EDTA + NaOCl or NaOCl + QMix irrigation of the pulp chamber was not deleterious to the bonding of any of the adhesives tested.
牙本质黏附:不同根管冲洗剂对牙本质的影响
目的:评价不同根管灌洗方案对采用现代简化粘接剂的树脂复合修复体在牙髓腔内的密封能力的影响。材料与方法:75颗拔除的人磨牙分为6组。去除牙髓室顶盖并拔出牙髓后,用生理盐水冲洗后将牙髓室与G-Bond结合(组1);乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)(第2组)、NaOCl + QMix(第3组)或经生理盐水冲洗(第4组)、EDTA和NaOCl(第5组)、NaOCl + QMix(第6组)后与OptiBond胶粘剂粘合。每组10个样本进行染料渗透评估。在扫描电镜下对15个样品进行了评价。数据采用Mann-Whitney检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析,P < 0.05。结果:EDTA + NaOCl或NaOCl + QMix预处理牙本质均可显著降低粘接剂OptiBond的微泄漏评分,但对G-Bond的微泄漏没有影响。结论:EDTA + NaOCl或NaOCl + QMix冲洗牙髓腔对所有黏合剂的粘接均无不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信