Clustered Redundant Keypoint Elimination SURF Method in MRI Image Registration Based on Alpha-Trimmed Relationship

Q3 Health Professions
Zahra Hossein-Nejad, M. Nasri
{"title":"Clustered Redundant Keypoint Elimination SURF Method in MRI Image Registration Based on Alpha-Trimmed Relationship","authors":"Zahra Hossein-Nejad, M. Nasri","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i2.12216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The process of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) image registration is one of the important branches in MRI image analysis, which is a necessary pre-processing to use the information in these images. The purpose of this paper is to present a new approach for MRI image registration that can maintain the total number of initial matches and have the highest precision. \nMaterials and Methods: The Clustered Redundant Keypoint Elimination Method-Scale Invariant Feature Transform (CRKEM-SIFT) algorithm has recently been introduced to eliminate redundancies and upgrade the correspondence precision. The disadvantages of this algorithm include the high execution time and the number of incorrect correspondences. In this paper, to increase the accuracy and speed of MRI image registration, the CRKEM method is first used over the Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF) algorithm. Then, Spatial Relations Correspondence (SRC) and Alpha-Trimmed Spatial Relations Correspondence (ATSRC) methods are suggested to improve correspondences. These suggested methods, unlike conventional methods such as Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC(, which only eliminates incorrect correspondences, detect incorrect correspondences based on spatial relationships and turn them into correct correspondences. Converting incorrect correspondences to correct ones can increase the number of correct correspondences and ultimately increase the precision of correspondences. \nResults: The simulation results show that the suggested CRKEMSURF-ATSRC approach improves the mean by 28.92% in terms of precision and 37.58% in SITMMC compared to those of the SIFT-ARANSAC method. \nConclusion: The suggested SRC and ATSRC methods use the spatial relations of the initial correspondences to convert the incorrect correspondences into correct ones. The number of initial correspondences is maintained in these suggested approaches. These methods are better than other methods of improving correspondences such as RANSAC, and Graph Transformation Matching (GTM). These suggested methods can be used as a new and efficient approach to improve the correspondence of medical images.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i2.12216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The process of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) image registration is one of the important branches in MRI image analysis, which is a necessary pre-processing to use the information in these images. The purpose of this paper is to present a new approach for MRI image registration that can maintain the total number of initial matches and have the highest precision. Materials and Methods: The Clustered Redundant Keypoint Elimination Method-Scale Invariant Feature Transform (CRKEM-SIFT) algorithm has recently been introduced to eliminate redundancies and upgrade the correspondence precision. The disadvantages of this algorithm include the high execution time and the number of incorrect correspondences. In this paper, to increase the accuracy and speed of MRI image registration, the CRKEM method is first used over the Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF) algorithm. Then, Spatial Relations Correspondence (SRC) and Alpha-Trimmed Spatial Relations Correspondence (ATSRC) methods are suggested to improve correspondences. These suggested methods, unlike conventional methods such as Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC(, which only eliminates incorrect correspondences, detect incorrect correspondences based on spatial relationships and turn them into correct correspondences. Converting incorrect correspondences to correct ones can increase the number of correct correspondences and ultimately increase the precision of correspondences. Results: The simulation results show that the suggested CRKEMSURF-ATSRC approach improves the mean by 28.92% in terms of precision and 37.58% in SITMMC compared to those of the SIFT-ARANSAC method. Conclusion: The suggested SRC and ATSRC methods use the spatial relations of the initial correspondences to convert the incorrect correspondences into correct ones. The number of initial correspondences is maintained in these suggested approaches. These methods are better than other methods of improving correspondences such as RANSAC, and Graph Transformation Matching (GTM). These suggested methods can be used as a new and efficient approach to improve the correspondence of medical images.
基于alpha -修剪关系的MRI图像配准聚类冗余关键点消除SURF方法
目的:磁共振成像(MRI)图像配准过程是MRI图像分析的重要分支之一,是利用图像信息进行预处理的必要步骤。本文的目的是提出一种新的MRI图像配准方法,该方法可以保持初始匹配的总数并具有最高的精度。材料和方法:最近引入了聚类冗余关键点消除方法-尺度不变特征变换(crkam - sift)算法来消除冗余,提高对应精度。该算法的缺点是执行时间长,错误通信数量多。为了提高MRI图像配准的精度和速度,本文首次将CRKEM方法应用于SURF算法之上。在此基础上,提出了空间关系对应(SRC)和alpha - trim空间关系对应(ATSRC)方法来改善对应关系。这些建议的方法,不像传统的方法,如随机样本共识(RANSAC),只消除不正确的对应,检测不正确的对应基于空间关系,并将其转化为正确的对应。将错误的通信转换为正确的通信可以增加正确通信的数量,最终提高通信的精度。结果:仿真结果表明,与SIFT-ARANSAC方法相比,CRKEMSURF-ATSRC方法的精度提高了28.92%,SITMMC的精度提高了37.58%。结论:建议的SRC和ATSRC方法利用初始对应的空间关系将错误对应转化为正确对应。在这些建议的方法中保持了初始通信的数量。这些方法比RANSAC和图变换匹配(GTM)等其他改进对应关系的方法更好。这些方法为提高医学图像的对应性提供了一种新的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信