The Definition of 'Security' Under the Federal Securities Laws

Arthur B. Laby
{"title":"The Definition of 'Security' Under the Federal Securities Laws","authors":"Arthur B. Laby","doi":"10.4337/9781782540076.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Definitions are essential in any regulatory regime and federal securities regulation is no exception. The most fundamental definition under federal and state securities regulation is for the term “security.” The application of multiple statutes, hundreds of administrative rules, and countless cases and interpretations, turns on this definition. This book chapter provides a brief overview of the definition of “security.” The goal is to provide a survey of the law, introduce key themes, and raise several controversial topics to give the reader a flavor for the debates that arise over the definition. Several themes emerge. First, the definition of “security” exemplifies the broader tension regarding the scope of federal securities regulation. Second, the definition dynamic, and lawyers, regulators, and courts often look to the definition of “security” to determine whether a newly minted investment scheme will be covered. Third, new products and services call for a careful review of the definition of “security” to determine whether it should be modified or adapted. The Chapter begins with the statutory definition of “security” and the definition of “investment contract,” a term included in the definition. It then discusses interests in various business organizations, such as corporations and partnerships. It then moves to a discussion of notes, derivative instruments, insurance products, and bank products, each presenting different problems. The Chapter then contains a short discussion of the state law definition of security primarily as a point of contrast with the federal definition. It concludes with emergent themes to keep in mind when analyzing whether a security exists.","PeriodicalId":10000,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782540076.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Definitions are essential in any regulatory regime and federal securities regulation is no exception. The most fundamental definition under federal and state securities regulation is for the term “security.” The application of multiple statutes, hundreds of administrative rules, and countless cases and interpretations, turns on this definition. This book chapter provides a brief overview of the definition of “security.” The goal is to provide a survey of the law, introduce key themes, and raise several controversial topics to give the reader a flavor for the debates that arise over the definition. Several themes emerge. First, the definition of “security” exemplifies the broader tension regarding the scope of federal securities regulation. Second, the definition dynamic, and lawyers, regulators, and courts often look to the definition of “security” to determine whether a newly minted investment scheme will be covered. Third, new products and services call for a careful review of the definition of “security” to determine whether it should be modified or adapted. The Chapter begins with the statutory definition of “security” and the definition of “investment contract,” a term included in the definition. It then discusses interests in various business organizations, such as corporations and partnerships. It then moves to a discussion of notes, derivative instruments, insurance products, and bank products, each presenting different problems. The Chapter then contains a short discussion of the state law definition of security primarily as a point of contrast with the federal definition. It concludes with emergent themes to keep in mind when analyzing whether a security exists.
联邦证券法下“证券”的定义
定义在任何监管制度中都是必不可少的,联邦证券监管也不例外。联邦和州证券法规中最基本的定义是“证券”一词。许多法规、数百条行政法规以及无数的案例和解释的应用都围绕着这一定义。本章简要概述了“安全性”的定义。目的是提供法律的调查,介绍关键主题,并提出几个有争议的话题,让读者了解关于定义的辩论。出现了几个主题。首先,“证券”的定义体现了有关联邦证券监管范围的更广泛的紧张关系。其次,定义是动态的,律师、监管机构和法院通常会根据“证券”的定义来确定是否涵盖新成立的投资计划。第三,新产品和新服务要求仔细审查“安全”的定义,以确定是否应该修改或调整它。本章首先从“证券”的法定定义和“投资合同”的定义入手。然后讨论各种商业组织的利益,如公司和合伙企业。然后讨论票据、衍生工具、保险产品和银行产品,每种产品都有不同的问题。然后,本章对州法律对安全的定义进行了简短的讨论,主要是作为与联邦定义的对比。它总结了在分析证券是否存在时要记住的紧急主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信