The Subject’s Perspective Objection to Externalism and Why it Fails

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Logos and Episteme Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5840/logos-episteme202011324

Perry Hendricks

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The subject’s perspective objection (SPO) is an objection against externalist theories of justification, warrant, and knowledge. In this article, I show that externalists can accommodate the SPO while remaining externalist. So, even if the SPO is successful, it does not motivate internalism, and the primary motivation for internalism has been lost. After this, I provide an explanation for why so many people find cases that motivate the SPO convincing.

查看原文本刊更多论文

主体视角对外在主义的反对及其失败的原因

主体的视角异议(SPO)是对外在主义的正当性、保证性和知识性理论的异议。在本文中，我将展示外部主义者可以在保持外部主义者的同时容纳SPO。因此，即使SPO成功了，它也没有激发内部主义，内部主义的主要动机已经丧失。在此之后，我提供了一个解释，为什么这么多人发现激励SPO的案例令人信服。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logos and Episteme Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： the journal publishes articles, reviews or discussion notes focused as well on problems concerning the general theory of knowledge, as on problems specific to the philosophy, methodology and ethics of science, philosophical logic, metaphilosophy, moral epistemology, epistemology of art, epistemology of religion, social or political epistemology, epistemology of communication. Studies in the history of science and of the philosophy of knowledge, or studies in the sociology of knowledge, cognitive psychology, and cognitive science are also welcome.