The Origin of Transformation of ‘Aqidah and Their Impact on Politics: A Study on Zayd bin ‘Alī and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Mohammad Qaed Mohammad Qaed Hassan Alwajeeh
{"title":"The Origin of Transformation of ‘Aqidah and Their Impact on Politics: A Study on Zayd bin ‘Alī and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn","authors":"Mohammad Qaed Mohammad Qaed Hassan Alwajeeh","doi":"10.22452/afkar.vol23no1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study highlights the differences of political thought between Zayd bin ‘Alī bin Abi Talib r.a and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn, founder of Zaydiyyah state in Yemen regarding the doctrine of al-Imamah, al-Wisayah, al-‘Ismah, al-Rajʽah and al-Taqiyyah. Therefore, this article adopts the inductive descriptive historical approach to achieve the objectives of the study. The most significant results shows that Zayd bin ‘Alī denied the Imams’ infallibility, al-Mahdiyyah and rajʽah, al-Wisayah (guardianship), taqiyyah and otherwise acknowledged the legitimacy of the two early caliphs; which makes his madhhab among the most moderate and the closest to the Sunni. In contrast, Yahyā bin al-Ḥusayn linked the concept of imamate to the Prophethood, acknowledged rajʽāh and al-Wisayah as proof of the legitimacy of ‘Ali (radiyallah anh) and his sons as imams. This stand shows an agreement with the Twelver (Shia Ithna ‘Ashariyyah).","PeriodicalId":53770,"journal":{"name":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afkar-Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam-Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol23no1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study highlights the differences of political thought between Zayd bin ‘Alī bin Abi Talib r.a and Yaḥyā bin al-Ḥusayn, founder of Zaydiyyah state in Yemen regarding the doctrine of al-Imamah, al-Wisayah, al-‘Ismah, al-Rajʽah and al-Taqiyyah. Therefore, this article adopts the inductive descriptive historical approach to achieve the objectives of the study. The most significant results shows that Zayd bin ‘Alī denied the Imams’ infallibility, al-Mahdiyyah and rajʽah, al-Wisayah (guardianship), taqiyyah and otherwise acknowledged the legitimacy of the two early caliphs; which makes his madhhab among the most moderate and the closest to the Sunni. In contrast, Yahyā bin al-Ḥusayn linked the concept of imamate to the Prophethood, acknowledged rajʽāh and al-Wisayah as proof of the legitimacy of ‘Ali (radiyallah anh) and his sons as imams. This stand shows an agreement with the Twelver (Shia Ithna ‘Ashariyyah).
阿齐达转型的起源及其对政治的影响——以扎伊德·本·阿尔伊和Yaḥyā本·阿尔伊-Ḥusayn为例
本研究着重分析了扎伊德·本·阿尔·本·阿比·塔利布与也门扎伊迪耶国创始人Yaḥyā本·阿尔-Ḥusayn在伊玛玛、维萨耶、伊斯玛、拉吉·阿哈和塔奇耶教义方面的政治思想差异。因此,本文采用归纳描述性的历史方法来达到研究的目的。最重要的结果表明,扎伊德·本·阿尔伊否认伊玛目的无错,al-Mahdiyyah和raj yaah, al-Wisayah(监护),taqiyyah,并在其他方面承认两位早期哈里发的合法性;这使得他的madhhab成为最温和、最接近逊尼派的人之一。相比之下,yahyybin al-Ḥusayn将伊玛目的概念与先知联系起来,承认raj al- āh和al- wisayah是阿里(radiyallah anh)及其儿子作为伊玛目合法性的证明。这一立场显示了与十二神(Shia Ithna’Ashariyyah)的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
60.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信