S. Darabi, A. Elliott, David Braxton, J. Zeng, K. Poorman, J. Swensen, G. Gibney, J. Moser, T. Phung, M. Atkins, G. In, W. Korn, B. Eisenberg, M. Demeure
{"title":"Abstract 2221: Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals oncogenic fusions in melanoma","authors":"S. Darabi, A. Elliott, David Braxton, J. Zeng, K. Poorman, J. Swensen, G. Gibney, J. Moser, T. Phung, M. Atkins, G. In, W. Korn, B. Eisenberg, M. Demeure","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Oncogenic gene fusions are frequently identified in different cancers; however, the exact incidence of oncogenic fusions in melanoma is not well defined. Several targeted therapies are approved and considered the standard of care for patients whose solid or hematologic tumors harbor particular gene fusions, but their role as targets in melanoma also remains undelineated. We sought to determine the prevalence of oncogenic fusions in metastatic or locally advanced melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples sent to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences) from February 2019 to July 2020. Samples were profiled by next-generation sequencing of a 592-gene DNA panel, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Melanoma specimens were analyzed from 1,255 subjects, of whom 478 (38.1%) were female and 777 (61.9%) were male, with a median age of 67 years. Of these specimens, 780 (63.1%) were from metastatic sites. We identified 33 (2.6%) cases with in-frame oncogenic fusions (14 novel) including 21 BRAF fusions and 4 RAF1 fusions, as well as fusions involving PRKCA (n=4), TERT (n=2), AXL (n=1), and FGFR3 (n=1). PD-L1 expression by IHC (SP142 or 28-8 antibody) was detected in 512 (42.5%) specimens, including 10 (32.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, while 572 (47.4%) specimens were TMB-High (≥10 mutations/Mb), including 11 (33.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, suggesting these patients may respond to immunotherapy. We identified 796 (63.4%) cases with RAS/RAF pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations, including 373 (30.0%) BRAF p.V600X mutations. With the exception of a single BRAF p.S467L (Class 3, “kinase-dead”) mutation, the absence of BRAF mutations in BRAF fusion-positive tumors suggests these fusions are oncogenic drivers. However, tumors harboring PRKCA and TERT fusions were each detected with at least one MAPK pathway co-alteration (NRAS, NF1, or BRAF p.V600E mutation). Fusion transcripts with unknown pathogenicity were also detected in 668 (53.2%) cases. RNA expression analysis of key molecular pathways (including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, DNA repair, INFG, and JAK/STAT) showed a high degree of variability among fusion-positive tumors and other mutational subgroups, which may reflect the heterogeneity common to melanoma, prior treatments or development of various resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: Oncogenic gene fusions are rare in melanoma when compared with other genetic variants. We identified potentially actionable fusions as well as co-alterations in fusion-positive cases, with notably mutual exclusivity of BRAF fusions and p.V600X mutations. The data suggest that targetable variants, including oncogenic fusions, may be identified in melanoma with comprehensive tumor profiling and provide patients with personalized treatment or clinical trial options. Citation Format: Sourat Darabi, Andrew Elliott, David R. Braxton, Jia Zeng, Kelsey Poorman, Jeffrey Swensen, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Justin C. Moser, Thuy Phung, Michael B. Atkins, Gino K. In, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Burton L. Eisenberg, Michael J. Demeure. Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals oncogenic fusions in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2221.","PeriodicalId":18754,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and Cellular Biology / Genetics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and Cellular Biology / Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Oncogenic gene fusions are frequently identified in different cancers; however, the exact incidence of oncogenic fusions in melanoma is not well defined. Several targeted therapies are approved and considered the standard of care for patients whose solid or hematologic tumors harbor particular gene fusions, but their role as targets in melanoma also remains undelineated. We sought to determine the prevalence of oncogenic fusions in metastatic or locally advanced melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples sent to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences) from February 2019 to July 2020. Samples were profiled by next-generation sequencing of a 592-gene DNA panel, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Melanoma specimens were analyzed from 1,255 subjects, of whom 478 (38.1%) were female and 777 (61.9%) were male, with a median age of 67 years. Of these specimens, 780 (63.1%) were from metastatic sites. We identified 33 (2.6%) cases with in-frame oncogenic fusions (14 novel) including 21 BRAF fusions and 4 RAF1 fusions, as well as fusions involving PRKCA (n=4), TERT (n=2), AXL (n=1), and FGFR3 (n=1). PD-L1 expression by IHC (SP142 or 28-8 antibody) was detected in 512 (42.5%) specimens, including 10 (32.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, while 572 (47.4%) specimens were TMB-High (≥10 mutations/Mb), including 11 (33.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, suggesting these patients may respond to immunotherapy. We identified 796 (63.4%) cases with RAS/RAF pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations, including 373 (30.0%) BRAF p.V600X mutations. With the exception of a single BRAF p.S467L (Class 3, “kinase-dead”) mutation, the absence of BRAF mutations in BRAF fusion-positive tumors suggests these fusions are oncogenic drivers. However, tumors harboring PRKCA and TERT fusions were each detected with at least one MAPK pathway co-alteration (NRAS, NF1, or BRAF p.V600E mutation). Fusion transcripts with unknown pathogenicity were also detected in 668 (53.2%) cases. RNA expression analysis of key molecular pathways (including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, DNA repair, INFG, and JAK/STAT) showed a high degree of variability among fusion-positive tumors and other mutational subgroups, which may reflect the heterogeneity common to melanoma, prior treatments or development of various resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: Oncogenic gene fusions are rare in melanoma when compared with other genetic variants. We identified potentially actionable fusions as well as co-alterations in fusion-positive cases, with notably mutual exclusivity of BRAF fusions and p.V600X mutations. The data suggest that targetable variants, including oncogenic fusions, may be identified in melanoma with comprehensive tumor profiling and provide patients with personalized treatment or clinical trial options. Citation Format: Sourat Darabi, Andrew Elliott, David R. Braxton, Jia Zeng, Kelsey Poorman, Jeffrey Swensen, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Justin C. Moser, Thuy Phung, Michael B. Atkins, Gino K. In, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Burton L. Eisenberg, Michael J. Demeure. Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals oncogenic fusions in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2221.
导读:在不同的癌症中经常发现致癌基因融合;然而,黑色素瘤中致瘤性融合的确切发生率尚不明确。一些靶向治疗已被批准,并被认为是治疗实体肿瘤或血液学肿瘤患者的标准治疗方法,但它们作为黑色素瘤靶点的作用仍未明确。我们试图确定转移性或局部晚期黑色素瘤中致癌融合的患病率。方法:回顾性分析2019年2月至2020年7月送到商业clia认证实验室(Caris Life Sciences)的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)肿瘤样本的数据。通过下一代592基因DNA测序、全转录组测序和免疫组化(IHC)对样品进行分析。结果:共分析1255例黑色素瘤标本,其中女性478例(38.1%),男性777例(61.9%),中位年龄67岁。这些标本中,780例(63.1%)来自转移部位。我们确定了33例(2.6%)框架内致癌融合(14例新颖),包括21例BRAF融合和4例RAF1融合,以及涉及PRKCA (n=4)、TERT (n=2)、AXL (n=1)和FGFR3 (n=1)的融合。免疫组化检测到PD-L1表达(SP142或28-8抗体)512例(42.5%),其中融合阳性肿瘤10例(32.3%),TMB-High(≥10个突变/Mb) 572例(47.4%),融合阳性肿瘤11例(33.3%),提示这些患者可能对免疫治疗有反应。我们发现796例(63.4%)患者具有RAS/RAF致病性或可能致病性突变,其中包括373例(30.0%)BRAF p.V600X突变。除了单个BRAF p.S467L(3类,“激酶死亡”)突变外,BRAF融合阳性肿瘤中没有BRAF突变,这表明这些融合是致癌驱动因素。然而,含有PRKCA和TERT融合物的肿瘤都被检测到至少有一种MAPK通路共改变(NRAS、NF1或BRAF p.V600E突变)。668例(53.2%)病例中检测到致病性未知的融合转录物。关键分子通路(包括Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, DNA修复,INFG和JAK/STAT)的RNA表达分析显示融合阳性肿瘤和其他突变亚群之间的高度变异性,这可能反映了黑色素瘤常见的异质性,既往治疗或各种耐药机制的发展。结论:与其他基因变异相比,致瘤基因融合在黑色素瘤中是罕见的。我们在融合阳性的病例中发现了潜在的可操作的融合以及共改变,特别是BRAF融合和p.V600X突变的互斥性。这些数据表明,包括致瘤融合在内的可靶向变异,可能在黑色素瘤中通过全面的肿瘤分析被识别出来,并为患者提供个性化的治疗或临床试验选择。引文格式:Sourat Darabi, Andrew Elliott, David R. Braxton, Jia Zeng, Kelsey Poorman, Jeffrey Swensen, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Justin C. Moser, Thuy Phung, Michael B. Atkins, Gino K. In, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Burton L. Eisenberg, Michael J. Demeure。全转录组测序揭示黑色素瘤的致癌融合[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):2221。