Comparison of efficacy between canagliflozin and teneligliptin as add-on therapy to metformin and glimepiride on plasma glucose levels along with blood pressure and lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

A. Gautam, Shoorvir V. Singh, Ankit Gupta, Anupam Sharma, Saurabh Gupta, N. Pursnani, P. Agrawal
{"title":"Comparison of efficacy between canagliflozin and teneligliptin as add-on therapy to metformin and glimepiride on plasma glucose levels along with blood pressure and lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus","authors":"A. Gautam, Shoorvir V. Singh, Ankit Gupta, Anupam Sharma, Saurabh Gupta, N. Pursnani, P. Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/jod.jod_31_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite of several guidelines metformin and glimepiride remains the first prescribed drug in most people with diabetes. Very often canagliflozin and teneligliptin remain the third prescribed OHA. Efficacy of teneligliptin and canagliflozin as solo drug or in combination with other single OHA’s on glycaemic parameters, lipid profiles & blood pressure is already established. But their efficacy on above parameters when used as third drug next to metformin and sulfonylurea is still not investigated. Aims and objectives: Aim of this study is to compare glycaemic and non-glycemic effects of canagliflozin and teneligliptin as third line drug. Objective is to establish their multiple pleotropic effects at this position. Methods: Subjects with uncontrolled glycaemic parameters with hypertension and diabetic dyslipidaemia already on half maximal doses of metformin and glimepiride were enrolled in the study. Out of 87 selections, 45 were prescribed canagliflozin 100 mg/d and to 42 subjects, teneligliptin 20mg/d, each for 24 weeks. Effects over HbA1c, fasting and post prandial plasma glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, HDL’c and triglycerides were observed pre and post intervention. Results: As a third drug both canagliflozin and teneligliptin show significant reduction in HbA1c (1.5 versus 1.6%), fasting (-20.2 versus -28.8 mg %), and post prandial (-39.9 versus – 58.5mg %). Effects over systolic (4 mmHg versus 1.1 mmHg) and diastolic BP (3.1 mmHg versus 0.2 mmHg) was clinically and statistically significant (p = 0.3 and 0.1) respectively in both groups. A statistically insignificant (9.6 versus 4.1 mg%; p =) reduction in Triglycerides but significant (7.6 versus 1.2; p <0.0001) increase in HDL’c was observed. Conclusion: Canagliflozin and teneligliptin, both retains their glycaemic and non-glycaemic benefits even when used as third OHA for diabetes management. Canagliflozin scores better for comorbid hypertension and diabetic dyslipidaemia.","PeriodicalId":15627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetology","volume":"61 1","pages":"157 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_31_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite of several guidelines metformin and glimepiride remains the first prescribed drug in most people with diabetes. Very often canagliflozin and teneligliptin remain the third prescribed OHA. Efficacy of teneligliptin and canagliflozin as solo drug or in combination with other single OHA’s on glycaemic parameters, lipid profiles & blood pressure is already established. But their efficacy on above parameters when used as third drug next to metformin and sulfonylurea is still not investigated. Aims and objectives: Aim of this study is to compare glycaemic and non-glycemic effects of canagliflozin and teneligliptin as third line drug. Objective is to establish their multiple pleotropic effects at this position. Methods: Subjects with uncontrolled glycaemic parameters with hypertension and diabetic dyslipidaemia already on half maximal doses of metformin and glimepiride were enrolled in the study. Out of 87 selections, 45 were prescribed canagliflozin 100 mg/d and to 42 subjects, teneligliptin 20mg/d, each for 24 weeks. Effects over HbA1c, fasting and post prandial plasma glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, HDL’c and triglycerides were observed pre and post intervention. Results: As a third drug both canagliflozin and teneligliptin show significant reduction in HbA1c (1.5 versus 1.6%), fasting (-20.2 versus -28.8 mg %), and post prandial (-39.9 versus – 58.5mg %). Effects over systolic (4 mmHg versus 1.1 mmHg) and diastolic BP (3.1 mmHg versus 0.2 mmHg) was clinically and statistically significant (p = 0.3 and 0.1) respectively in both groups. A statistically insignificant (9.6 versus 4.1 mg%; p =) reduction in Triglycerides but significant (7.6 versus 1.2; p <0.0001) increase in HDL’c was observed. Conclusion: Canagliflozin and teneligliptin, both retains their glycaemic and non-glycaemic benefits even when used as third OHA for diabetes management. Canagliflozin scores better for comorbid hypertension and diabetic dyslipidaemia.
在二甲双胍和格列美脲基础上加用卡格列净和替尼格列汀对2型糖尿病患者血糖、血压和血脂水平的影响比较
背景:尽管有一些指南,二甲双胍和格列美脲仍然是大多数糖尿病患者的首选处方药。通常,卡格列净和替尼格列汀仍然是OHA的第三处方。替尼格列汀和卡格列净单独用药或与其他单一OHA联合用药对血糖参数、血脂和血压的影响已经确定。但作为二甲双胍、磺脲类药物后的第三种用药,其在上述指标上的疗效尚不明确。目的和目的:本研究的目的是比较卡格列净和替尼格列汀作为三线药物的降糖和非降糖作用。目的是确定其在该部位的多重多效性。方法:血糖参数不受控制并伴有高血压和糖尿病性血脂异常的受试者已服用最大剂量的一半二甲双胍和格列美脲纳入研究。在87个选择中,45个受试者服用卡格列净100mg /d, 42个受试者服用替尼格列汀20mg/d,每个疗程24周。观察干预前后对HbA1c、空腹和餐后血糖、收缩压和舒张压、HDL 'c和甘油三酯的影响。结果:作为第三种药物,canagliflozin和teneligliptin在空腹(-20.2 mg %对-28.8 mg %)和餐后(-39.9 mg %对- 58.5mg %)均显示出显著的HbA1c降低(1.5%对1.6%)。两组对收缩压(4mmhg vs 1.1 mmHg)和舒张压(3.1 mmHg vs 0.2 mmHg)的影响分别具有临床和统计学意义(p = 0.3和0.1)。统计学上不显著(9.6 vs 4.1 mg%;p =)降低甘油三酯,但显著(7.6对1.2;p <0.0001), HDL 'c升高。结论:加格列净和替尼格列汀即使作为糖尿病治疗的第三种OHA,也能保持它们的降糖和非降糖益处。卡格列净对合并症高血压和糖尿病性血脂异常评分更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信