Risk stratification for the primary prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in postinfarction patients

P. Arsenos, S. Sideris, K. A. Gatzoulis
{"title":"Risk stratification for the primary prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in postinfarction patients","authors":"P. Arsenos,&nbsp;S. Sideris,&nbsp;K. A. Gatzoulis","doi":"10.1002/cce2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) threatens ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Antiarrhythmic protection may be provided to these patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD), after an efficient risk stratification approach. The proposed risk stratifier of an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction has limited sensitivity. Current risk stratification strategies focus on markers that, by identifying the arrhythmic substrate and the severity of the arrhythmia mechanisms present, are also considered to quantify the risk of SCD. Such markers reflect: (1) myocardial substrate lesions and postinfarction fibrosis (LVEF, QRS, LBBB, SAECG, fragmented QRS, CMR, PVBs, NSVT), (2) abnormal repolarization (QT, QTd, T-wave alternans, QT/RR, QTVI, TWV), (3) impaired autonomic nervous system function (HR, heart rate variability (HRV), HRT, deceleration capacity (DC), BRS, HR recovery after exercise), and (4) inducibility on programmed ventricular stimulation during electrophysiological testing. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias have a strong dynamic component because transient and unpredictable factors can trigger a fatal arrhythmic episode. For this reason, SCD risk stratification is not simple and no ideal marker or a completely successful predictive model is existing. The evolution of technology made possible all the noninvasive markers to be incorporated in the Holter software. Noninvasive risk stratification has been simplified. Innovative Holter technology enforced the doctors, providing them with the tools for primarily screening their patients through the ICD protection process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Answer questions and earn CME</b>: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469459/Activity.aspx</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100331,"journal":{"name":"Continuing Cardiology Education","volume":"2 3","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cce2.32","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuing Cardiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cce2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) threatens ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Antiarrhythmic protection may be provided to these patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD), after an efficient risk stratification approach. The proposed risk stratifier of an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction has limited sensitivity. Current risk stratification strategies focus on markers that, by identifying the arrhythmic substrate and the severity of the arrhythmia mechanisms present, are also considered to quantify the risk of SCD. Such markers reflect: (1) myocardial substrate lesions and postinfarction fibrosis (LVEF, QRS, LBBB, SAECG, fragmented QRS, CMR, PVBs, NSVT), (2) abnormal repolarization (QT, QTd, T-wave alternans, QT/RR, QTVI, TWV), (3) impaired autonomic nervous system function (HR, heart rate variability (HRV), HRT, deceleration capacity (DC), BRS, HR recovery after exercise), and (4) inducibility on programmed ventricular stimulation during electrophysiological testing. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias have a strong dynamic component because transient and unpredictable factors can trigger a fatal arrhythmic episode. For this reason, SCD risk stratification is not simple and no ideal marker or a completely successful predictive model is existing. The evolution of technology made possible all the noninvasive markers to be incorporated in the Holter software. Noninvasive risk stratification has been simplified. Innovative Holter technology enforced the doctors, providing them with the tools for primarily screening their patients through the ICD protection process.

Answer questions and earn CME: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469459/Activity.aspx

Abstract Image

梗死后患者心律失常性心源性猝死一级预防的风险分层
心源性猝死(SCD)是缺血性心肌病患者的重要威胁。通过一种有效的风险分层方法,可以为这些植入心脏除颤器(ICD)的患者提供抗心律失常保护。提出的左心室射血分数受损的风险分层指标敏感性有限。目前的风险分层策略侧重于标志物,通过识别心律失常底物和心律失常机制的严重程度,也被认为可以量化SCD的风险。这些标志物反映:(1)心肌底物病变和梗死后纤维化(LVEF、QRS、LBBB、SAECG、碎片化QRS、CMR、pvb、NSVT);(2)复极异常(QT、QTd、t波交替、QT/RR、QTVI、TWV);(3)自主神经系统功能受损(HR、心率变异性(HRV)、HRT、减速能力(DC)、BRS、运动后HR恢复);(4)电生理试验时程序性心室刺激的诱导性。室性心动过速有很强的动态成分,因为短暂和不可预测的因素可以触发致命的心律失常发作。因此,SCD的风险分层并不简单,目前还没有理想的标志物或完全成功的预测模型。技术的发展使得所有的非侵入性标记都可以被整合到Holter软件中。无创风险分层已经简化。创新的霍尔特技术强制医生,为他们提供了通过ICD保护过程对患者进行主要筛查的工具。回答问题并获得CME: https://wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity2/4469459/Activity.aspx
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信