Does Attending a Regional Medical Campus Influence the Training Outcomes of Family Medicine Residents?

Komal Kochhar, Laurie M Fancher, J. Brokaw, Peter M Nalin
{"title":"Does Attending a Regional Medical Campus Influence the Training Outcomes of Family Medicine Residents?","authors":"Komal Kochhar, Laurie M Fancher, J. Brokaw, Peter M Nalin","doi":"10.24926/JRMC.V2I1.1997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) is the largest medical school in the nation, with its main campus located in Indianapolis and eight regional medical campuses (RMC) distributed across the state. In this study, we compared the survey responses of family medicine residents who had attended medical school at the main campus in Indianapolis versus an RMC to see if there were any noticeable differences in their residency training outcomes. \nMethods: From 2012 to 2017, in the spring of each year, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all final-year family medicine residents graduating from the eleven family medicine residency programs in Indiana. A total of 519 out of 520 residents completed the survey. Of whom, 132 respondents indicated they had graduated from IUSM; 45 reported they had attended the Indianapolis campus and 87 had attended one of the RMCs in the state. Our dataset for this study was comprised of these 132 respondents. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare responses between groups. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. \nResults: In the ACGME competency areas, the residents who attended an RMC versus the Indianapolis campus were significantly more likely to report being fully competent in Medical Knowledge (90% vs. 76%, p = 0.032) and Systems-Based Practice (83% vs. 64%, p = 0.019). Additionally, the residents who attended an RMC compared to their Indianapolis counterparts reported significantly higher rates of being trained to serve rural populations (73% vs. 52%, p = 0.017) as well as being fully competent to serve rural populations (69% vs. 42%, p = 0.003). However, the residents who attended an RMC were no more likely to establish a practice in a rural area than were the residents who attended Indianapolis (18% vs. 17%, p = 0.845). \nConclusions: Based on these self-reported data, the family medicine residents who attended an RMC may perceive themselves to be better-prepared in a few core competency areas, as well as in serving rural populations, compared to those who attended the Indianapolis campus. These findings suggest that IUSM’s complex statewide system of medical education may offer some unique advantages in preparing students for residency, especially in family medicine. \n  \nNone of the authors has a conflict of interest. This study was granted exempt status by our institution’s Institutional Review Board.","PeriodicalId":92811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of regional medical campuses","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of regional medical campuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/JRMC.V2I1.1997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) is the largest medical school in the nation, with its main campus located in Indianapolis and eight regional medical campuses (RMC) distributed across the state. In this study, we compared the survey responses of family medicine residents who had attended medical school at the main campus in Indianapolis versus an RMC to see if there were any noticeable differences in their residency training outcomes. Methods: From 2012 to 2017, in the spring of each year, a cross-sectional survey was administered to all final-year family medicine residents graduating from the eleven family medicine residency programs in Indiana. A total of 519 out of 520 residents completed the survey. Of whom, 132 respondents indicated they had graduated from IUSM; 45 reported they had attended the Indianapolis campus and 87 had attended one of the RMCs in the state. Our dataset for this study was comprised of these 132 respondents. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare responses between groups. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In the ACGME competency areas, the residents who attended an RMC versus the Indianapolis campus were significantly more likely to report being fully competent in Medical Knowledge (90% vs. 76%, p = 0.032) and Systems-Based Practice (83% vs. 64%, p = 0.019). Additionally, the residents who attended an RMC compared to their Indianapolis counterparts reported significantly higher rates of being trained to serve rural populations (73% vs. 52%, p = 0.017) as well as being fully competent to serve rural populations (69% vs. 42%, p = 0.003). However, the residents who attended an RMC were no more likely to establish a practice in a rural area than were the residents who attended Indianapolis (18% vs. 17%, p = 0.845). Conclusions: Based on these self-reported data, the family medicine residents who attended an RMC may perceive themselves to be better-prepared in a few core competency areas, as well as in serving rural populations, compared to those who attended the Indianapolis campus. These findings suggest that IUSM’s complex statewide system of medical education may offer some unique advantages in preparing students for residency, especially in family medicine.   None of the authors has a conflict of interest. This study was granted exempt status by our institution’s Institutional Review Board.
参加地区医学院对家庭医学住院医师培训效果有影响吗?
简介:印第安纳大学医学院(usm)是美国最大的医学院,其主校区位于印第安纳波利斯,八个区域医学校区(RMC)分布在全州各地。在本研究中,我们比较了在印第安纳波利斯主校区就读医学院的家庭医学住院医师与在RMC就读的家庭医学住院医师的调查回答,看看他们的住院医师培训结果是否有显著差异。方法:从2012年到2017年,每年春季对印第安纳州11个家庭医学住院医师项目毕业的所有家庭医学住院医师进行横断面调查。520名居民中有519人完成了调查。其中,有132名受访者表示毕业于usm;45人报告说他们曾就读于印第安纳波利斯校区,87人曾就读于该州的一所军事管理学院。本研究的数据集由这132名受访者组成。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较组间反应。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:在ACGME能力领域,与印第安纳波利斯校区相比,参加RMC的住院医生更有可能报告完全胜任医学知识(90%对76%,p = 0.032)和基于系统的实践(83%对64%,p = 0.019)。此外,与印第安纳波利斯的居民相比,参加RMC的居民被培训为农村人口服务的比例(73%对52%,p = 0.017)以及完全有能力为农村人口服务的比例(69%对42%,p = 0.003)明显更高。然而,参加RMC的居民并不比参加印第安纳波利斯的居民更有可能在农村地区建立实践(18%对17%,p = 0.845)。结论:基于这些自我报告的数据,参加RMC的家庭医学住院医师可能认为自己在一些核心能力领域做好了更好的准备,以及为农村人口服务,与参加印第安纳波利斯校区的家庭医学住院医师相比。这些发现表明,usm复杂的全州医学教育系统可能为学生准备住院医师提供一些独特的优势,特别是在家庭医学方面。所有作者都没有利益冲突。本研究被我们机构的机构审查委员会授予豁免地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信