Indirect influence, lobbies interdependence and ecological protectionism

L. Jaeck, Julien Hanoteau, Gilbert Bougi
{"title":"Indirect influence, lobbies interdependence and ecological protectionism","authors":"L. Jaeck, Julien Hanoteau, Gilbert Bougi","doi":"10.17256/JER.2015.20.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the setting of sustainability standards, such as those recently implemented in Europe and in the United States, as a political compromise pressured by the lobbying of competing industries and under the indirect influence of ecologists. Using a common agency model of lobbying, we extend Yandle's theory of `Bootleggers and Baptists' of interdependence between interest groups. Paradoxically, the indirect and information-based influence of ecologists can lead to a less constraining standard. We show, in a context of trade liberalization, that this influence leads nonetheless to a tightening of standards in large countries","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"23 1","pages":"169-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2015.20.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper analyzes the setting of sustainability standards, such as those recently implemented in Europe and in the United States, as a political compromise pressured by the lobbying of competing industries and under the indirect influence of ecologists. Using a common agency model of lobbying, we extend Yandle's theory of `Bootleggers and Baptists' of interdependence between interest groups. Paradoxically, the indirect and information-based influence of ecologists can lead to a less constraining standard. We show, in a context of trade liberalization, that this influence leads nonetheless to a tightening of standards in large countries
间接影响,游说相互依赖和生态保护主义
本文分析了可持续性标准的设定,例如最近在欧洲和美国实施的标准,作为一种政治妥协,受到竞争行业的游说和生态学家的间接影响。利用一个共同的游说代理模型,我们扩展了Yandle关于利益集团之间相互依赖的“走私者和浸信会教徒”理论。矛盾的是,生态学家的间接和基于信息的影响可以导致较少的约束标准。我们表明,在贸易自由化的背景下,这种影响仍然导致大国的标准收紧
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信