Nonlinear modeling of liming reaction and extractable base curves

J. Viana, M. R. D. Albuquerque Filho, Flávia C. dos Santos, Daniela de A. Ladeira
{"title":"Nonlinear modeling of liming reaction and extractable base curves","authors":"J. Viana, M. R. D. Albuquerque Filho, Flávia C. dos Santos, Daniela de A. Ladeira","doi":"10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n10p820-827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Modeling the response of soils to liming is important for understanding neutralization reactions and predicting lime residual effects. Models based on simple or quadratic polynomial equations are the most used due to their simplicity and ease of fitting; however, they fail to reproduce a realistic soil response to liming, indicating a decrease in pH as the lime dose is increased after reaching a maximum point. Thus, several nonlinear functions were tested and compared to polynomial models, using a dataset from a liming test conducted on a sandy clay loam soil in a farm. The best-fitting models for pH data were the Mitscherlich, three-parameter logistic, and Morgan-Mercer-Flodin models. The best-fitting models for exchangeable Ca+2 + Mg+2 data were Skaggs et al., Gompertz, and Morgan- Mercer-Flodin. The use of the proposed T index, which ranks models based on their residual standard error and Akaike information criterion values, combined with constraints on extrapolation values, was useful for selecting models that are statistically robust and empirically coherent.","PeriodicalId":21302,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n10p820-827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Modeling the response of soils to liming is important for understanding neutralization reactions and predicting lime residual effects. Models based on simple or quadratic polynomial equations are the most used due to their simplicity and ease of fitting; however, they fail to reproduce a realistic soil response to liming, indicating a decrease in pH as the lime dose is increased after reaching a maximum point. Thus, several nonlinear functions were tested and compared to polynomial models, using a dataset from a liming test conducted on a sandy clay loam soil in a farm. The best-fitting models for pH data were the Mitscherlich, three-parameter logistic, and Morgan-Mercer-Flodin models. The best-fitting models for exchangeable Ca+2 + Mg+2 data were Skaggs et al., Gompertz, and Morgan- Mercer-Flodin. The use of the proposed T index, which ranks models based on their residual standard error and Akaike information criterion values, combined with constraints on extrapolation values, was useful for selecting models that are statistically robust and empirically coherent.
石灰化反应的非线性建模及可提取碱曲线
模拟土壤对石灰的响应对于理解中和反应和预测石灰残留效应非常重要。基于简单或二次多项式方程的模型由于其简单和易于拟合而最常用;然而,它们不能重现土壤对石灰的真实反应,表明在达到最大值后,随着石灰剂量的增加,pH值会下降。因此,我们对几个非线性函数进行了测试,并将其与多项式模型进行了比较,使用的数据集来自于一个农场的砂质粘土壤土的石灰化测试。pH数据的最佳拟合模型为Mitscherlich、三参数logistic和Morgan-Mercer-Flodin模型。可交换Ca+2 + Mg+2数据的最佳拟合模型是Skaggs等人、Gompertz和Morgan- Mercer-Flodin。根据模型的残差标准误差和赤池信息准则值对模型进行排序,并结合外推值的约束,使用所提出的T指数有助于选择统计上稳健且经验上一致的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信