Arbeitsschutz „im Huckepack“ – ein alternatives Konzept zur Ansprache von Unternehmen auf Sicherheits- und Gesundheitsthemen. Teil II: Erprobung in einer Maßnahme für Kleinunternehmen

Q4 Medicine
A. Zimber, Julika Horchler, Imke Weiser, S. Gregersen, Martin Prüße, Britta Schmitt-Howe, Ulrike Pietrzyk, M. Cosmar
{"title":"Arbeitsschutz „im Huckepack“ – ein alternatives Konzept zur Ansprache von Unternehmen auf Sicherheits- und Gesundheitsthemen. Teil II: Erprobung in einer Maßnahme für Kleinunternehmen","authors":"A. Zimber, Julika Horchler, Imke Weiser, S. Gregersen, Martin Prüße, Britta Schmitt-Howe, Ulrike Pietrzyk, M. Cosmar","doi":"10.17147/asu-1-30189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational safety “piggybacked” – an alternative concept for addressing companies with safety and health issues. Part II: Implementation in a measure for small businesses Background: Entrepreneurs in small businesses represent a challenging but also underestimated target group for occupational safety and health (OSH) prevention activities. Objective: Referring to the article published in ASU 6/2023 on the theoretical foundation of the “piggyback method”, an alternative concept for addressing small business owners on OSH issues is being developed and implemented. Method: OSH issues were linked by content to topics preferred by the target group and presented according to the principles of second-order conditioning. The interactive events were marketed by two chambers and evaluated by an online survey with a random sample of n = 40. Results: The procedure and implementation were rated positively overall by the participants. The OSH issues (target stimulus) were rated as just as relevant as the lack of skilled workers and self-care (context stimuli). Conclusions: The results speak for the usefulness of the “piggyback method” for OSH prevention activities. However, the results are not sufficient as a proof of effectiveness; this requires further practical tests and evaluations. Keywords: occupational safety and health – small businesses – entrepreneurs – evaluation","PeriodicalId":53639,"journal":{"name":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-30189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational safety “piggybacked” – an alternative concept for addressing companies with safety and health issues. Part II: Implementation in a measure for small businesses Background: Entrepreneurs in small businesses represent a challenging but also underestimated target group for occupational safety and health (OSH) prevention activities. Objective: Referring to the article published in ASU 6/2023 on the theoretical foundation of the “piggyback method”, an alternative concept for addressing small business owners on OSH issues is being developed and implemented. Method: OSH issues were linked by content to topics preferred by the target group and presented according to the principles of second-order conditioning. The interactive events were marketed by two chambers and evaluated by an online survey with a random sample of n = 40. Results: The procedure and implementation were rated positively overall by the participants. The OSH issues (target stimulus) were rated as just as relevant as the lack of skilled workers and self-care (context stimuli). Conclusions: The results speak for the usefulness of the “piggyback method” for OSH prevention activities. However, the results are not sufficient as a proof of effectiveness; this requires further practical tests and evaluations. Keywords: occupational safety and health – small businesses – entrepreneurs – evaluation
与保护劳动同“背贴”,一个替代的方法,即公司要在安全和卫生事务上跟别人说话。第二部分:小企业调查
“背驮式”职业安全——解决存在安全和健康问题的公司的另一种概念。第二部分:小企业措施的实施背景:小企业企业家是职业安全和健康预防活动的一个具有挑战性但又被低估的目标群体。目的:参考ASU 6/2023发表的关于“piggyback method”理论基础的文章,正在开发和实施解决小企业主职业安全与健康问题的替代概念。方法:将职业安全与健康问题按内容与目标群体偏好的话题联系起来,按照二阶条件反射的原则进行呈现。互动活动由两个商会进行营销,并通过随机抽样n = 40的在线调查进行评估。结果:整个过程和实施得到了参与者的积极评价。职业安全与健康问题(目标刺激)被评为与缺乏熟练工人和自我保健(情境刺激)一样相关。结论:结果说明了“背驮式方法”在职业安全与健康预防活动中的有效性。然而,结果不足以证明其有效性;这需要进一步的实际测试和评估。关键词:职业安全卫生;小企业;企业家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信