Numerical Simulation of Sprinkler Suppression of Rack Storage Fires

Yi Wang, K. Meredith, Xiangyang Zhou, P. Chatterjee, Y. Xin, M. Chaos, N. Ren, S. Dorofeev
{"title":"Numerical Simulation of Sprinkler Suppression of Rack Storage Fires","authors":"Yi Wang, K. Meredith, Xiangyang Zhou, P. Chatterjee, Y. Xin, M. Chaos, N. Ren, S. Dorofeev","doi":"10.3801/iafss.fss.11-1170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fire suppression tests with ceiling sprinkler protection in a rack storage fuel configuration are simulated using a Computational Fluid Dynamics tool. The fuel is arranged in a double-row, six pallet-load wide and three-tier high (2×6×3) rack storage array. Each pallet load consists of three nested double-wall corrugated cardboard boxes surrounding a metal liner. Two types of ceiling sprinklers are used in this study: a pendent quick response sprinkler designated as K14, and an upright standard response sprinkler designated as K11.2. The tests are simulated using FireFOAM, which couples necessary sub-models for fire growth, sprinkler response, and fire suppression. Numerical results are compared with experiments for both free burn tests under a 20-MW calorimeter and sprinkler suppression tests under a 7.6 m high ceiling. For the free burn case, the model results show good quantitative agreement of heat release rates in all three phases, from ignition to fire growth and steady burning. For the suppression cases, the model reproduces the suppression effectiveness of the two sprinkler protection designs: K14 sprinklers suppress the fire rapidly with only one sprinkler activation, while with K11.2 sprinklers, both in the tests and simulation, the fire spreads to the pallets on the end of the fuel array with multiple sprinkler activations. The modeled sprinkler activation times are within the estimated experimental uncertainty following three repeat tests. Quantitative results characterizing sprinkler suppression performance obtained from the simulations, such as the actual delivered density (ADD) and water evaporation rate, are also reported.","PeriodicalId":12145,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.11-1170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Fire suppression tests with ceiling sprinkler protection in a rack storage fuel configuration are simulated using a Computational Fluid Dynamics tool. The fuel is arranged in a double-row, six pallet-load wide and three-tier high (2×6×3) rack storage array. Each pallet load consists of three nested double-wall corrugated cardboard boxes surrounding a metal liner. Two types of ceiling sprinklers are used in this study: a pendent quick response sprinkler designated as K14, and an upright standard response sprinkler designated as K11.2. The tests are simulated using FireFOAM, which couples necessary sub-models for fire growth, sprinkler response, and fire suppression. Numerical results are compared with experiments for both free burn tests under a 20-MW calorimeter and sprinkler suppression tests under a 7.6 m high ceiling. For the free burn case, the model results show good quantitative agreement of heat release rates in all three phases, from ignition to fire growth and steady burning. For the suppression cases, the model reproduces the suppression effectiveness of the two sprinkler protection designs: K14 sprinklers suppress the fire rapidly with only one sprinkler activation, while with K11.2 sprinklers, both in the tests and simulation, the fire spreads to the pallets on the end of the fuel array with multiple sprinkler activations. The modeled sprinkler activation times are within the estimated experimental uncertainty following three repeat tests. Quantitative results characterizing sprinkler suppression performance obtained from the simulations, such as the actual delivered density (ADD) and water evaporation rate, are also reported.
喷淋灭火火灾的数值模拟
使用计算流体动力学工具模拟了在机架存储燃料配置中吊顶喷头的灭火试验。燃料被安排在一个双排,六个托盘负载宽和三层高(2×6×3)机架存储阵列。每个托盘负载由三个嵌套的双壁瓦楞纸箱围绕一个金属衬垫。本研究中使用了两种类型的天花板洒水喷头:一种是指定为K14的悬挂式快速响应洒水喷头,另一种是指定为K11.2的直立式标准响应洒水喷头。测试使用FireFOAM进行模拟,该模型耦合了火灾生长、喷头响应和灭火的必要子模型。将数值结果与20 mw量热仪下的自由燃烧试验和7.6 m高吊顶下的喷头抑制试验进行了比较。在自由燃烧情况下,模型结果表明,从点火到火焰生长和稳定燃烧的所有三个阶段的放热速率都有很好的定量一致性。在灭火情况下,该模型再现了两种喷头保护设计的灭火效果:K14型喷头只需启动一个喷头即可快速灭火,而K11.2型喷头在试验和仿真中都可以在多个喷头启动的情况下将火势蔓延到燃料阵列末端的托盘上。在三次重复试验后,模拟的喷头激活时间在估计的实验不确定度之内。本文还报道了从模拟中获得的表征喷头灭火性能的定量结果,如实际输送密度(ADD)和水蒸发速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信