Comparison of GeneXpert against Light-Emitting Diode Fluorescent Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

B. D. Taddese, D. Desalegn, A. S. Misganaw, K. T. Kitila, Hanna Mekonnen Balcha, C. Gebeyehu, Tinsae K Hailu, Abraham Tesfaye Bika
{"title":"Comparison of GeneXpert against Light-Emitting Diode Fluorescent Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","authors":"B. D. Taddese, D. Desalegn, A. S. Misganaw, K. T. Kitila, Hanna Mekonnen Balcha, C. Gebeyehu, Tinsae K Hailu, Abraham Tesfaye Bika","doi":"10.4172/1948-5948.1000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tuberculosis remains a global health problem despite availability of effective tools. Globally, there were 40% of the 10+ million patients with TB did not get diagnosed or notified. The study was aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of iLED-FM and GeneXpert test for the diagnosis of PTB in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 286 sputum samples collected from health centers and hospitals clients with presumptive TB from December 2016 to March 2017. Kappa value, Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of iLED-FM and GeneXpert were calculated against the gold standard. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of iLED-FM was 80.15%, 95.48%, 93.75% and 85.06%, for GeneXpert 88.55%, 92.90%, 91.34% and 90.57%, respectively. Kappa value of iLED-FM was 0.765 and 0.817 for GeneXpert. Out of 55 HIV positive presumptive TB patients enrolled in the study, 19 (34.55%) were sputum smear positive by iLED-FM. However, 24 (43.64%) TB cases were detected by GeneXpert. Conclusion: The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay was better than iLED-FM in the diagnosis of PTB. It should be implemented as primary diagnostic test in areas where overlapping synergy of TB and HIV/AIDS is high.","PeriodicalId":16453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","volume":"115 1","pages":"12-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis remains a global health problem despite availability of effective tools. Globally, there were 40% of the 10+ million patients with TB did not get diagnosed or notified. The study was aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of iLED-FM and GeneXpert test for the diagnosis of PTB in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 286 sputum samples collected from health centers and hospitals clients with presumptive TB from December 2016 to March 2017. Kappa value, Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of iLED-FM and GeneXpert were calculated against the gold standard. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of iLED-FM was 80.15%, 95.48%, 93.75% and 85.06%, for GeneXpert 88.55%, 92.90%, 91.34% and 90.57%, respectively. Kappa value of iLED-FM was 0.765 and 0.817 for GeneXpert. Out of 55 HIV positive presumptive TB patients enrolled in the study, 19 (34.55%) were sputum smear positive by iLED-FM. However, 24 (43.64%) TB cases were detected by GeneXpert. Conclusion: The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay was better than iLED-FM in the diagnosis of PTB. It should be implemented as primary diagnostic test in areas where overlapping synergy of TB and HIV/AIDS is high.
GeneXpert与发光二极管荧光显微镜在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴诊断肺结核的比较
背景:尽管有有效的工具,结核病仍然是一个全球性的健康问题。在全球1000多万结核病患者中,有40%没有得到诊断或通知。本研究旨在比较iLED-FM和GeneXpert检测对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴肺结核的诊断效果。方法:对2016年12月至2017年3月在卫生中心和医院收集的286例推定结核病患者的痰样本进行基于机构的横断面研究。根据金标准计算iLED-FM和GeneXpert的Kappa值、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:iLED-FM的敏感性为80.15%,特异性为95.48%,PPV为93.75%,NPV为85.06%,GeneXpert的敏感性为88.55%,特异性为92.90%,PPV为91.34%,NPV为90.57%。iLED-FM的Kappa值为0.765,GeneXpert为0.817。在纳入研究的55例HIV阳性推定结核病患者中,19例(34.55%)的iLED-FM痰涂片阳性。GeneXpert共检出24例(43.64%)。结论:Xpert MTB/RIF检测对PTB的诊断敏感性优于iLED-FM。在结核病和艾滋病毒/艾滋病重叠协同作用高的地区,应将其作为初级诊断试验加以实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信