Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Online dan Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Aplikasi Konsep

Angga Pratama
{"title":"Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Online dan Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Aplikasi Konsep","authors":"Angga Pratama","doi":"10.37850/ibtida.v3i02.353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the differences in the learning outcomes of the application of concepts to students who learn to use online strategies with face-to-face learning strategies, as well as to test whether there is a difference in the average learning outcomes of the application of concepts to students who have different learning styles and to test whether there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning outcomes. learning styles on the learning outcomes of student concept applications. This study used a quasi-experimental research design. 2x2 factorial design The variables of this study are the independent variables are online learning strategies and face-to-face learning, the control variables are learning styles and the dependent variable is the learning outcomes of concept application. This research instrument is a question of pretest and posttest which was developed in accordance with the research objectives of the lectures listed in the RPS. The hypothesis testing of this research uses 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test the hypothesis, in the form of the Univariate Test of Between-Subject Effects. The results of this study indicate (1) there are significant differences, including learning outcomes of student concept applications using online learning strategies with face-to-face learning strategies. The use of online learning strategies is significantly superior to face-to-face learning strategies., (2) there is a significant difference in the acquisition of concept application learning outcomes between students who have an active learning style and a reflective learning style, significantly students who have an active learning style are more superior in learning outcomes of concept applications compared to students who have reflective learning styles. (3) there is an interaction between online learning, learning strategies and learning styles on concept application learning outcomes. the influence between the interaction, the independent variable and the moderator variable on the dependent variable, both for the learning outcomes of the application of the concept.","PeriodicalId":31448,"journal":{"name":"Al Ibtida Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI","volume":"255 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Ibtida Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37850/ibtida.v3i02.353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the learning outcomes of the application of concepts to students who learn to use online strategies with face-to-face learning strategies, as well as to test whether there is a difference in the average learning outcomes of the application of concepts to students who have different learning styles and to test whether there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning outcomes. learning styles on the learning outcomes of student concept applications. This study used a quasi-experimental research design. 2x2 factorial design The variables of this study are the independent variables are online learning strategies and face-to-face learning, the control variables are learning styles and the dependent variable is the learning outcomes of concept application. This research instrument is a question of pretest and posttest which was developed in accordance with the research objectives of the lectures listed in the RPS. The hypothesis testing of this research uses 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test the hypothesis, in the form of the Univariate Test of Between-Subject Effects. The results of this study indicate (1) there are significant differences, including learning outcomes of student concept applications using online learning strategies with face-to-face learning strategies. The use of online learning strategies is significantly superior to face-to-face learning strategies., (2) there is a significant difference in the acquisition of concept application learning outcomes between students who have an active learning style and a reflective learning style, significantly students who have an active learning style are more superior in learning outcomes of concept applications compared to students who have reflective learning styles. (3) there is an interaction between online learning, learning strategies and learning styles on concept application learning outcomes. the influence between the interaction, the independent variable and the moderator variable on the dependent variable, both for the learning outcomes of the application of the concept.
在线学习策略和学习风格对概念应用程序学习结果的影响
本研究旨在确定学习在线策略与面对面学习策略的学生在概念应用的学习效果上的差异,检验不同学习风格的学生在概念应用的平均学习效果上是否存在差异,检验学习策略与学习效果之间是否存在交互作用。学习风格对学生概念应用学习成果的影响。本研究采用准实验研究设计。本研究的变量为自变量为在线学习策略和面对面学习,控制变量为学习风格,因变量为概念应用的学习结果。这个研究工具是一个前测和后测的问题,是根据RPS中列出的讲座的研究目标而开发的。本研究的假设检验采用2-way方差分析(ANOVA)来检验假设,采用单变量主体间效应检验的形式。本研究结果表明:(1)使用在线学习策略的学生概念应用与使用面对面学习策略的学生概念应用的学习效果存在显著差异。在线学习策略的使用明显优于面对面学习策略。(2)积极学习风格与反思性学习风格的学生在概念应用学习成果的习得上存在显著差异,积极学习风格的学生在概念应用学习成果上明显优于反思性学习风格的学生。(3)在线学习、学习策略和学习风格对概念应用学习效果有交互作用。相互作用、自变量和调节变量对因变量的影响,两者对于概念应用的学习结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信