Calculation of zenith delays from meteorological data comparison of NWP model, radiosonde and GPS delays

H. Vedel, K.S. Mogensen, X.-Y. Huang
{"title":"Calculation of zenith delays from meteorological data comparison of NWP model, radiosonde and GPS delays","authors":"H. Vedel,&nbsp;K.S. Mogensen,&nbsp;X.-Y. Huang","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00091-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We discuss aspects of how to derive precise estimates of zenith total delays (ZTD's) of the neutral atmosphere (its non-ionized constituents) from meteorological data in order to validate ZTD's derived from ground based GPS (Global Positioning System) observations. The goal is that a later stage GPS ZTD's may conversely be used in numerical weather prediction (NWP) model validation and forecasting. We determine ZTD by numerical integration over modeled or measured profiles of the atmosphere. Doing so, we find it is necessary to discriminate between geopotential and geometric heights. A term is added for the delay arising above the known atmospheric profile. Results obtained for the dry delay by numerical integration and by the Saastamoinen compare well, offsets being of sub millimeter scale only. The offsets we attribute to the time variations of the atmospheric temperature and humidity profile not being accounted for in the Saastamoinen formula. It is found that conversion of the dewpoint temperatures appearing in radiosonde (RS) reports to relative humidities may constitute a problem, and give an estimate of the maximum error associated with that. The GPS sites are in general not co-located with the RS sites nor with the grid-points of the model fields. Before deriving and comparing ZTD's it is necessary to correct for such positional offsets. We find that the correction for vertical offsets between GPS and RS sites or model orography is ambiguous, which can introduce errors.</p><p>Using our ZTD calculation algorithms we compare ZTD's based on data from the first one and half year of the MAGIC project. The results are: <figure><img></figure></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101024,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy","volume":"26 6","pages":"Pages 497-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00091-6","citationCount":"81","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464189501000916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

Abstract

We discuss aspects of how to derive precise estimates of zenith total delays (ZTD's) of the neutral atmosphere (its non-ionized constituents) from meteorological data in order to validate ZTD's derived from ground based GPS (Global Positioning System) observations. The goal is that a later stage GPS ZTD's may conversely be used in numerical weather prediction (NWP) model validation and forecasting. We determine ZTD by numerical integration over modeled or measured profiles of the atmosphere. Doing so, we find it is necessary to discriminate between geopotential and geometric heights. A term is added for the delay arising above the known atmospheric profile. Results obtained for the dry delay by numerical integration and by the Saastamoinen compare well, offsets being of sub millimeter scale only. The offsets we attribute to the time variations of the atmospheric temperature and humidity profile not being accounted for in the Saastamoinen formula. It is found that conversion of the dewpoint temperatures appearing in radiosonde (RS) reports to relative humidities may constitute a problem, and give an estimate of the maximum error associated with that. The GPS sites are in general not co-located with the RS sites nor with the grid-points of the model fields. Before deriving and comparing ZTD's it is necessary to correct for such positional offsets. We find that the correction for vertical offsets between GPS and RS sites or model orography is ambiguous, which can introduce errors.

Using our ZTD calculation algorithms we compare ZTD's based on data from the first one and half year of the MAGIC project. The results are:

从气象资料比较NWP模式、探空和GPS延迟计算天顶延迟
我们讨论了如何从气象数据中获得中性大气(其非电离成分)的天顶总延迟(ZTD)的精确估计,以验证地面GPS(全球定位系统)观测所得的ZTD。目标是后期GPS ZTD可能反过来用于数值天气预报(NWP)模式验证和预报。我们通过对模拟或测量的大气剖面进行数值积分来确定ZTD。这样做,我们发现有必要区分位势高度和几何高度。增加了一个术语来表示在已知大气剖面之上产生的延迟。用数值积分法和Saastamoinen法计算干延迟的结果比较好,偏移量仅在亚毫米尺度上。我们归因于大气温度和湿度剖面的时间变化的偏移量在Saastamoinen公式中没有考虑到。我们发现,将无线电探空仪(RS)报告中出现的露点温度转换为相对湿度可能构成一个问题,并给出与之相关的最大误差估计。GPS站点一般不与RS站点或模型场的网格点同址。在推导和比较ZTD之前,有必要对这种位置偏移进行校正。我们发现GPS和RS站点或模式地形之间的垂直偏移校正是模糊的,这可能会引入误差。使用我们的ZTD计算算法,我们根据MAGIC项目头一年半的数据比较了ZTD。结果是:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信