The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. Reliability and validity.

H. Cronstedt, A. Waldner, C. Stenström
{"title":"The Swedish version of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. Reliability and validity.","authors":"H. Cronstedt, A. Waldner, C. Stenström","doi":"10.1080/03009749950155698-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). A total of 113 patients were assessed with the BASFI, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). The median BASFI scores on two occasions within 24 hours were 3.6 versus 3.7 (p>0.05). The patients found the BASFI items relevant. The median self-reported and physiotherapist-observed BASFI scores were 3.4 and 2.8 respectively (p>0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASFI and the BASMI was r(s)=0.55, between the BASFI and the BASDAI r(s)=0.68, and between the BASFI and the BAS-G r(s)=0.67. Significant improvements between the pre- and post-training results for both the BASFI (3.1 vs 2.0, p<0.001) and the BASMI (3.0 vs 1.0, p<0.001) were found after three weeks' inpatient rehabilitation. The results indicated that the Swedish BASFI is reliable and valid.","PeriodicalId":21501,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":"70 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009749950155698-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and the validity of the Swedish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). A total of 113 patients were assessed with the BASFI, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). The median BASFI scores on two occasions within 24 hours were 3.6 versus 3.7 (p>0.05). The patients found the BASFI items relevant. The median self-reported and physiotherapist-observed BASFI scores were 3.4 and 2.8 respectively (p>0.05). The correlation coefficient between the BASFI and the BASMI was r(s)=0.55, between the BASFI and the BASDAI r(s)=0.68, and between the BASFI and the BAS-G r(s)=0.67. Significant improvements between the pre- and post-training results for both the BASFI (3.1 vs 2.0, p<0.001) and the BASMI (3.0 vs 1.0, p<0.001) were found after three weeks' inpatient rehabilitation. The results indicated that the Swedish BASFI is reliable and valid.
瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数。信度和效度。
本研究的目的是调查瑞典版巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)的可靠性和有效性。共113例患者采用BASFI、巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎计量指数(BASMI)和巴斯强直性脊柱炎患者整体评分(BAS-G)进行评估。24小时内两次BASFI评分中位数分别为3.6和3.7 (p < 0.05)。患者发现BASFI项目相关。自我报告和物理治疗师观察的BASFI评分中位数分别为3.4和2.8 (p < 0.05)。BASFI与BASMI的相关系数r(s)=0.55, BASFI与BASDAI的相关系数r(s)=0.68, BASFI与BAS-G的相关系数r(s)=0.67。住院康复三周后,BASFI (3.1 vs 2.0, p<0.001)和BASMI (3.0 vs 1.0, p<0.001)的训练前后结果均有显著改善。结果表明,瑞典BASFI是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信