Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of patients on warfarin in primary care: randomized clinical trial

A. Schneider, Paula Lorenzoni Nunes, Karine Raquel Uhdich Kleibert, C. Colet, E. R. Winkelmann
{"title":"Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of patients on warfarin in primary care: randomized clinical trial","authors":"A. Schneider, Paula Lorenzoni Nunes, Karine Raquel Uhdich Kleibert, C. Colet, E. R. Winkelmann","doi":"10.15446/rcciquifa.v51n3.102279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the impact of pharmacotherapeutic follow-up on bleeding, time in therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, general adverse events, hospitalizations, drug interactions and average number of medications used in patients taking warfarin in the Brazilian public healthcare system. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with individuals divided into two groups (intervention group [pharmacotherapeutic follow-up] and control group) who received at-home visits over an eight-month period. Results: 38individuals (21 in the intervention group and 17 in the control group) concluded the study. Fewer number of cases of bleeding was found in the group that received pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, but no significant association was found between these variables. No significant association was found between pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and TTR. The intervention group had a greater frequency in the therapeutic range for capillary INR but not for laboratory INR. Reductions were found in the intervention group with regards to general adverse events, the use of medications and drug interactions, whereas no reduction was found in hospitalizations. Conclusions: Based on the findings of the present study, pharmacotherapeutic follow-up did not exert an influence on bleeding or TTR. However, reductions were found in adverse events and drug interactions, which can contribute to the rational use of medicines and could result in lower care costs for patients requiring blood thinners","PeriodicalId":21220,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Químico-Farmacéuticas","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Químico-Farmacéuticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/rcciquifa.v51n3.102279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the impact of pharmacotherapeutic follow-up on bleeding, time in therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, general adverse events, hospitalizations, drug interactions and average number of medications used in patients taking warfarin in the Brazilian public healthcare system. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with individuals divided into two groups (intervention group [pharmacotherapeutic follow-up] and control group) who received at-home visits over an eight-month period. Results: 38individuals (21 in the intervention group and 17 in the control group) concluded the study. Fewer number of cases of bleeding was found in the group that received pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, but no significant association was found between these variables. No significant association was found between pharmacotherapeutic follow-up and TTR. The intervention group had a greater frequency in the therapeutic range for capillary INR but not for laboratory INR. Reductions were found in the intervention group with regards to general adverse events, the use of medications and drug interactions, whereas no reduction was found in hospitalizations. Conclusions: Based on the findings of the present study, pharmacotherapeutic follow-up did not exert an influence on bleeding or TTR. However, reductions were found in adverse events and drug interactions, which can contribute to the rational use of medicines and could result in lower care costs for patients requiring blood thinners
初级保健中华法林患者的药物治疗随访:随机临床试验
目的:评价药物治疗随访对巴西公共卫生系统中服用华法林患者出血、治疗范围内时间(TTR)、血栓形成事件、一般不良事件、住院、药物相互作用和平均用药次数的影响。方法:采用随机临床试验方法,将患者分为干预组[药物治疗随访]和对照组,进行为期8个月的家访。结果:38人(干预组21人,对照组17人)完成研究。在接受药物治疗随访的组中发现出血病例较少,但这些变量之间没有发现显着关联。药物治疗随访与TTR无显著相关性。干预组毛细血管INR在治疗范围内的频率更高,而实验室INR则没有。干预组在一般不良事件、药物使用和药物相互作用方面有所减少,而住院治疗没有减少。结论:根据本研究结果,药物治疗随访对出血或TTR没有影响。然而,发现不良事件和药物相互作用有所减少,这有助于合理使用药物,并可能降低需要血液稀释剂的患者的护理费用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信