{"title":"Mike Goode, Romantic Capabilities: Blake, Scott, Austen, and the New Messages of Old Media","authors":"James Rovira","doi":"10.47761/biq.326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mike Goode’s Romantic Capabilities: Blake, Scott, Austen, and the New Messages of Old Media is an engaging and sophisticated extension of “Blakespotting,” his 2006 PMLA article in which he argues for texts’ “latent meaningfulness,” a latency that reveals their “potential energies in other times and places” (“Blakespotting” 771). Romantic Capabilities further theorizes that core idea by bringing together insights from media studies with insights from literary studies to discuss a text’s “behavior” as it moves forward from its time and place of origin, interpreting its later behavior as a sign of its latent potentials at the time of composition. For this reason, Goode’s analysis of a literary work’s future behavior differs from a reception history: reception histories usually emphasize human agency, what people do with texts in their afterlives, while Goode emphasizes the agency of the text, which is why he frames his discussion in terms of the text’s latency or potential energies. In other words, inherent features of the text present at the time of composition influence, at least to an extent, how the text behaves in the future, outside of its original context. Romantic Capabilities does not reduce literary studies to media studies, or media studies to literary studies, but “seeks to open Romantic studies and media studies out to one another in order to generate insights of interest to both fields” (5). This opening out includes a resistance to defining media behavior only in terms of the text’s new medium, a resistance that takes the form of a commitment to close reading: “This book is committed to the idea that techniques of close-reading language and form matter to any discussion of how a text behaves and how much its behavior in a particular case has to do with what it says” (14).","PeriodicalId":39620,"journal":{"name":"Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blake - An Illustrated Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47761/biq.326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mike Goode’s Romantic Capabilities: Blake, Scott, Austen, and the New Messages of Old Media is an engaging and sophisticated extension of “Blakespotting,” his 2006 PMLA article in which he argues for texts’ “latent meaningfulness,” a latency that reveals their “potential energies in other times and places” (“Blakespotting” 771). Romantic Capabilities further theorizes that core idea by bringing together insights from media studies with insights from literary studies to discuss a text’s “behavior” as it moves forward from its time and place of origin, interpreting its later behavior as a sign of its latent potentials at the time of composition. For this reason, Goode’s analysis of a literary work’s future behavior differs from a reception history: reception histories usually emphasize human agency, what people do with texts in their afterlives, while Goode emphasizes the agency of the text, which is why he frames his discussion in terms of the text’s latency or potential energies. In other words, inherent features of the text present at the time of composition influence, at least to an extent, how the text behaves in the future, outside of its original context. Romantic Capabilities does not reduce literary studies to media studies, or media studies to literary studies, but “seeks to open Romantic studies and media studies out to one another in order to generate insights of interest to both fields” (5). This opening out includes a resistance to defining media behavior only in terms of the text’s new medium, a resistance that takes the form of a commitment to close reading: “This book is committed to the idea that techniques of close-reading language and form matter to any discussion of how a text behaves and how much its behavior in a particular case has to do with what it says” (14).
Mike Goode的《浪漫能力:布莱克、斯科特、奥斯汀和旧媒体的新信息》是他2006年在PMLA发表的一篇文章“布莱克波特”的引人入胜和复杂的延伸,他在文章中主张文本的“潜在意义”,一种揭示文本“在其他时间和地点的潜在能量”的延迟(“布莱克波特”771)。《浪漫主义的能力》进一步将这一核心思想理论化,将媒体研究的见解与文学研究的见解结合起来,讨论文本从其起源的时间和地点向前发展的“行为”,将其后来的行为解释为其构成时潜在潜力的标志。因此,古德对文学作品未来行为的分析不同于接受史:接受史通常强调人的能动性,即人们在死后对文本所做的事情,而古德强调文本的能动性,这就是为什么他从文本的潜伏期或潜在能量的角度来构建他的讨论。换句话说,写作时文本的固有特征至少在一定程度上影响了文本在其原始上下文之外的未来行为。《浪漫主义能力》并没有将文学研究简化为媒介研究,也没有将媒介研究简化为文学研究,而是“试图将浪漫主义研究和媒介研究相互开放,以产生对两个领域都感兴趣的见解”(5)。这种开放包括对仅从文本的新媒介方面定义媒介行为的抵制,这种抵制采取了对细读的承诺的形式:“这本书致力于这样一种观点,即细读语言和形式的技巧对于任何关于文本行为的讨论都很重要,以及它在特定情况下的行为与它所说的内容有多大关系”(14)。
期刊介绍:
Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly was born as the Blake Newsletter on a mimeograph machine at the University of California, Berkeley in 1967. Edited by Morton D. Paley, the first issue ran to nine pages, was available for a yearly subscription rate of two dollars for four issues, and included the fateful words, "As far as editorial policy is concerned, I think the Newsletter should be just that—not an incipient journal." The production office of the Newsletter relocated to the University of New Mexico when Morris Eaves became co-editor in 1970, and then moved with him in 1986 to its present home at the University of Rochester.