Optimal and Efficient Auctions for the Gradual Procurement of Strategic Service Provider Agents

IF 4.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
F. Farhadi, Maria Chli, N. Jennings
{"title":"Optimal and Efficient Auctions for the Gradual Procurement of Strategic Service Provider Agents","authors":"F. Farhadi, Maria Chli, N. Jennings","doi":"10.1613/jair.1.14126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider an outsourcing problem where a software agent procures multiple services  from providers with uncertain reliabilities to complete a computational task before a  strict deadline. The service consumer’s goal is to design an outsourcing strategy (defining  which services to procure and when) so as to maximize a specific objective function. This  objective function can be different based on the consumer’s nature; a socially-focused consumer  often aims to maximize social welfare, while a self-interested consumer often aims  to maximize its own utility. However, in both cases, the objective function depends on  the providers’ execution costs, which are privately held by the self-interested providers and  hence may be misreported to influence the consumer’s decisions. For such settings, we  develop a unified approach to design truthful procurement auctions that can be used by  both socially-focused and, separately, self-interested consumers. This approach benefits  from our proposed weighted threshold payment scheme which pays the provably minimum  amount to make an auction with a monotone outsourcing strategy incentive compatible.  This payment scheme can handle contingent outsourcing plans, where additional procurement  happens gradually over time and only if the success probability of the already hired  providers drops below a time-dependent threshold. Using a weighted threshold payment  scheme, we design two procurement auctions that maximize, as well as two low-complexity  heuristic-based auctions that approximately maximize, the consumer’s expected utility and  expected social welfare, respectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness and strength of our  proposed auctions through both game-theoretical and empirical analysis. ","PeriodicalId":54877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We consider an outsourcing problem where a software agent procures multiple services  from providers with uncertain reliabilities to complete a computational task before a  strict deadline. The service consumer’s goal is to design an outsourcing strategy (defining  which services to procure and when) so as to maximize a specific objective function. This  objective function can be different based on the consumer’s nature; a socially-focused consumer  often aims to maximize social welfare, while a self-interested consumer often aims  to maximize its own utility. However, in both cases, the objective function depends on  the providers’ execution costs, which are privately held by the self-interested providers and  hence may be misreported to influence the consumer’s decisions. For such settings, we  develop a unified approach to design truthful procurement auctions that can be used by  both socially-focused and, separately, self-interested consumers. This approach benefits  from our proposed weighted threshold payment scheme which pays the provably minimum  amount to make an auction with a monotone outsourcing strategy incentive compatible.  This payment scheme can handle contingent outsourcing plans, where additional procurement  happens gradually over time and only if the success probability of the already hired  providers drops below a time-dependent threshold. Using a weighted threshold payment  scheme, we design two procurement auctions that maximize, as well as two low-complexity  heuristic-based auctions that approximately maximize, the consumer’s expected utility and  expected social welfare, respectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness and strength of our  proposed auctions through both game-theoretical and empirical analysis. 
战略服务供应商代理逐步采购的最优有效拍卖
我们考虑一个外包问题,其中软件代理从可靠性不确定的提供商处获得多个服务,以在严格的截止日期之前完成计算任务。服务消费者的目标是设计一个外包策略(定义采购哪些服务以及何时采购),从而最大化特定的目标函数。这个目标函数可以根据消费者的性质而有所不同;社会关注型消费者的目标往往是社会福利最大化,而自利型消费者的目标往往是自身效用最大化。然而,在这两种情况下,目标函数都取决于供应商的执行成本,这些成本由自利的供应商私人持有,因此可能会被误报以影响消费者的决策。在这种情况下,我们开发了一种统一的方法来设计真实的采购拍卖,既可以被社会关注的消费者使用,也可以被单独的自利消费者使用。这种方法受益于我们提出的加权阈值支付方案,该方案支付可证明的最低金额,使拍卖与单调的外包策略激励兼容。这种支付方案可以处理偶然的外包计划,在这种计划中,只有当已经雇用的供应商的成功概率低于与时间相关的阈值时,才会随着时间的推移逐渐进行额外的采购。使用加权阈值支付方案,我们设计了两个采购拍卖,分别最大化消费者的期望效用和期望社会福利,以及两个低复杂性的启发式拍卖,近似最大化消费者的期望效用和期望社会福利。我们通过博弈论和实证分析证明了我们提议的拍卖的有效性和强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: JAIR(ISSN 1076 - 9757) covers all areas of artificial intelligence (AI), publishing refereed research articles, survey articles, and technical notes. Established in 1993 as one of the first electronic scientific journals, JAIR is indexed by INSPEC, Science Citation Index, and MathSciNet. JAIR reviews papers within approximately three months of submission and publishes accepted articles on the internet immediately upon receiving the final versions. JAIR articles are published for free distribution on the internet by the AI Access Foundation, and for purchase in bound volumes by AAAI Press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信