Citizen participation and changing governance: Cases of devolution in England

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Brenton J. Prosser, A. Renwick, A. Giovannini, M. Sandford, M. Flinders, W. Jennings, Graham Smith, P. Spada, G. Stoker, K. Ghose
{"title":"Citizen participation and changing governance: Cases of devolution in England","authors":"Brenton J. Prosser, A. Renwick, A. Giovannini, M. Sandford, M. Flinders, W. Jennings, Graham Smith, P. Spada, G. Stoker, K. Ghose","doi":"10.1332/030557317X14895974141213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current process of devolving powers within England constitutes a significant change of governance arrangements. This process of devolution has been widely criticised for including insufficient consultation. This paper assesses whether that criticism is fair. Modifying Archon Fung’s framework for the analysis of public participation mechanisms, we begin by considering whether the depth of public engagement has been limited. Then, by comparing these consultation practices with other examples (including one we have ourselves trialled in pilot experiments), we find that deeper forms of public engagement would have been both possible (though at some financial cost) and productive.","PeriodicalId":47631,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Politics","volume":"25 1","pages":"251-269"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14895974141213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The current process of devolving powers within England constitutes a significant change of governance arrangements. This process of devolution has been widely criticised for including insufficient consultation. This paper assesses whether that criticism is fair. Modifying Archon Fung’s framework for the analysis of public participation mechanisms, we begin by considering whether the depth of public engagement has been limited. Then, by comparing these consultation practices with other examples (including one we have ourselves trialled in pilot experiments), we find that deeper forms of public engagement would have been both possible (though at some financial cost) and productive.
公民参与与治理变革:英国权力下放案例
目前英格兰内部权力下放的过程构成了治理安排的重大变化。这一权力下放过程因未充分征求意见而受到广泛批评。本文评估了这种批评是否公正。修改冯执政官的公众参与机制分析框架,我们首先考虑公众参与的深度是否受到限制。然后,通过将这些咨询实践与其他例子(包括我们自己在试点实验中试用的一个例子)进行比较,我们发现,更深层次的公众参与形式既可能(尽管要付出一些财务成本),又富有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信