On the effectiveness of interventions in hearing-impaired elders: a review of findings for psychosocial wellness and quality of life

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ilaria Giallini, B. M. S. Inguscio, M. Nicastri, F. Russo, H. Dincer D’Alessandro, G. Cartocci, P. Mancini
{"title":"On the effectiveness of interventions in hearing-impaired elders: a review of findings for psychosocial wellness and quality of life","authors":"Ilaria Giallini, B. M. S. Inguscio, M. Nicastri, F. Russo, H. Dincer D’Alessandro, G. Cartocci, P. Mancini","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2088179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Hearing loss has been the most common sensory impairment and one of the most challenging disabilities in the elderly population, with a multitude of consequences for the quality of life and psychosocial well-being. The present work was a narrative review on the effectiveness of communicative/psychosocial interventions that were designed for the elderly with hearing impairment. Methods A search of the academic database identified relevant articles based upon seven search facets (“quality of life,” “psychological,” “psychosocial wellbeing,” “hearing impaired,” “deaf,” “elderly”) up to November 2019. Inclusion criteria concerned the combined following terms: “quality of life,” “psychological” and “psychosocial wellbeing,” with the terms “hearing impaired” “deaf,” “elderly” and “interventions” and their possible variations. Results Only 9 out of 950 identified studies explicitly focused on psychosocial wellness and/or quality of life. Outcomes were sometimes contradictory in terms of the efficacy in quality of life and psychological wellbeing improvements. Conclusion Findings were promising in terms of quality of life improvement but did not allow for definitive conclusions, since study populations were heterogeneous and primary outcome measures did not always focus on deafness. Future research is needed to define effective protocols and evaluation measures that will be able to enlighten benefits in terms of psychosocial wellness and quality of life in the hearing impaired elderly population.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2088179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Hearing loss has been the most common sensory impairment and one of the most challenging disabilities in the elderly population, with a multitude of consequences for the quality of life and psychosocial well-being. The present work was a narrative review on the effectiveness of communicative/psychosocial interventions that were designed for the elderly with hearing impairment. Methods A search of the academic database identified relevant articles based upon seven search facets (“quality of life,” “psychological,” “psychosocial wellbeing,” “hearing impaired,” “deaf,” “elderly”) up to November 2019. Inclusion criteria concerned the combined following terms: “quality of life,” “psychological” and “psychosocial wellbeing,” with the terms “hearing impaired” “deaf,” “elderly” and “interventions” and their possible variations. Results Only 9 out of 950 identified studies explicitly focused on psychosocial wellness and/or quality of life. Outcomes were sometimes contradictory in terms of the efficacy in quality of life and psychological wellbeing improvements. Conclusion Findings were promising in terms of quality of life improvement but did not allow for definitive conclusions, since study populations were heterogeneous and primary outcome measures did not always focus on deafness. Future research is needed to define effective protocols and evaluation measures that will be able to enlighten benefits in terms of psychosocial wellness and quality of life in the hearing impaired elderly population.
听力受损老年人干预措施的有效性:对社会心理健康和生活质量的调查结果的回顾
听力损失是老年人最常见的感觉障碍和最具挑战性的残疾之一,对生活质量和社会心理健康产生多种影响。本研究是对老年人听力障碍的交际/社会心理干预的有效性进行述评。方法根据截至2019年11月的七个搜索方面(“生活质量”、“心理”、“社会心理健康”、“听力障碍”、“聋人”、“老年人”)对学术数据库进行检索,确定相关文章。纳入标准涉及以下综合术语:“生活质量”、“心理”和“社会心理健康”,以及“听障人士”、“聋人”、“老年人”和“干预措施”及其可能的变体。结果:在950项确定的研究中,只有9项明确关注心理健康和/或生活质量。在生活质量和心理健康改善方面,结果有时是矛盾的。研究结果在改善生活质量方面是有希望的,但没有给出明确的结论,因为研究人群是异质的,主要结果测量并不总是关注耳聋。未来的研究需要确定有效的方案和评估措施,以便能够在听障老年人的社会心理健康和生活质量方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信