Comparison of G-guide and Image-free Navigation System in Accuracy of Stem Anteversion Assessment During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Y. Fujihara, S. Fukunishi, Tomokazu Fukui, Shoji Nishio, Y. Takeda, Shohei Okahisa, S. Yoshiya
{"title":"Comparison of G-guide and Image-free Navigation System in Accuracy of Stem Anteversion Assessment During Total Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"Y. Fujihara, S. Fukunishi, Tomokazu Fukui, Shoji Nishio, Y. Takeda, Shohei Okahisa, S. Yoshiya","doi":"10.2174/1874325001913010109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV). Since 2013, we simultaneously measured stem AV using the G-guide and image-free navigation during THA procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement accuracy of the G-guide and navigation system using the postoperative CT results as a reference.\n \n \n \n In total, 59 hips in 56 patients who underwent primary THA using both the G-guide and image-free navigation system were included in the study. All patients underwent postoperative CT examination, and the femoral stem AV was assessed using a 3D image analysis system (Zed hip, LEXI, Japan). The AV angle derived from the postoperative CT image analysis was used as the reference value to assess the accuracy of the two intraoperative measurement systems.\n \n \n \n The discrepancy between the G-guide and the postoperative CT-measured values averaged 5.0° ± 3.9°, while the corresponding value for the navigation system was 5.2° ± 4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with a measurement error of less than 10° was achieved in 86% and 90% of the cases for the G-guide and navigation measurements respectively.\n \n \n \n Consequently, it was shown that both navigation and G-guide measurements can achieve comparative accuracy and are clinically useful.\n","PeriodicalId":23060,"journal":{"name":"The Open Orthopaedics Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Orthopaedics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001913010109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV). Since 2013, we simultaneously measured stem AV using the G-guide and image-free navigation during THA procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement accuracy of the G-guide and navigation system using the postoperative CT results as a reference. In total, 59 hips in 56 patients who underwent primary THA using both the G-guide and image-free navigation system were included in the study. All patients underwent postoperative CT examination, and the femoral stem AV was assessed using a 3D image analysis system (Zed hip, LEXI, Japan). The AV angle derived from the postoperative CT image analysis was used as the reference value to assess the accuracy of the two intraoperative measurement systems. The discrepancy between the G-guide and the postoperative CT-measured values averaged 5.0° ± 3.9°, while the corresponding value for the navigation system was 5.2° ± 4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with a measurement error of less than 10° was achieved in 86% and 90% of the cases for the G-guide and navigation measurements respectively. Consequently, it was shown that both navigation and G-guide measurements can achieve comparative accuracy and are clinically useful.
全髋关节置换术中g导与无图像导航系统对髋关节前倾评估准确性的比较
我们开发并使用重力导向器(G-guide)作为术中评估和调整椎体前倾(AV)的简单手动工具。自2013年以来,我们在THA过程中使用G-guide和无图像导航同时测量干AV。本研究的目的是比较G-guide和导航系统的测量精度,并以术后CT结果为参考。研究共纳入56例同时使用G-guide和无图像导航系统进行原发性THA的患者的59髋。所有患者均接受术后CT检查,并使用3D图像分析系统(Zed髋关节,LEXI,日本)评估股干AV。以术后CT图像分析得出的房室角作为参考值,评估两种术中测量系统的准确性。G-guide与术后ct测量值的差异平均为5.0°±3.9°,而导航系统的相应值为5.2°±4.1°。g导和导航测量分别在86%和90%的情况下达到了可接受的测量精度,测量误差小于10°。因此,导航和G-guide测量都可以达到相对的精度,并且在临床上是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信