Institutional ethics of care in Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the effects of the lockdown measures on girls and women trafficking survivors

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY
Jelena Ceriman, Jelena Hrnjak, Andrijana Radoicic-Nedeljkovic
{"title":"Institutional ethics of care in Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the effects of the lockdown measures on girls and women trafficking survivors","authors":"Jelena Ceriman, Jelena Hrnjak, Andrijana Radoicic-Nedeljkovic","doi":"10.2298/fid2204895c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic transparently show all the shortcomings of the Serbian system that should, in theory, provide support and protection to citizens in such circumstances. A particularly demanding task was to determine and measure the well-being of individuals during the pandemic, especially those from marginalized groups whose needs are not the priority to the system even under regular circumstances, those on the bottom of the social hierarchy who cannot influence the policies that shape their daily lives, or the decisions of authorities that further reproduce social inequalities. The paper examines institutional ethics of care during the pandemic in Serbia through the analysis of the adequacy of lockdown measures and their effects on the girls and women trafficking survivors. Analysis of the data collected in semi-structured interviews with girls and women showed that three central elements of the institutional (ethics of) care: the purpose of care, recognition of power relations, and the need for pluralistic tailoring of care to meet individuals? needs, were not fulfilled during the pandemic and that the logic of institutional care has had a politicizing character in Serbia.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2204895c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extreme situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic transparently show all the shortcomings of the Serbian system that should, in theory, provide support and protection to citizens in such circumstances. A particularly demanding task was to determine and measure the well-being of individuals during the pandemic, especially those from marginalized groups whose needs are not the priority to the system even under regular circumstances, those on the bottom of the social hierarchy who cannot influence the policies that shape their daily lives, or the decisions of authorities that further reproduce social inequalities. The paper examines institutional ethics of care during the pandemic in Serbia through the analysis of the adequacy of lockdown measures and their effects on the girls and women trafficking survivors. Analysis of the data collected in semi-structured interviews with girls and women showed that three central elements of the institutional (ethics of) care: the purpose of care, recognition of power relations, and the need for pluralistic tailoring of care to meet individuals? needs, were not fulfilled during the pandemic and that the logic of institutional care has had a politicizing character in Serbia.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间塞尔维亚的护理机构伦理:禁闭措施对贩运女童和妇女幸存者影响的案例研究
COVID-19大流行等极端情况清楚地显示了塞尔维亚制度的所有缺陷,理论上,在这种情况下,塞尔维亚制度应该为公民提供支持和保护。一项特别艰巨的任务是确定和衡量大流行病期间个人的福祉,特别是那些边缘化群体的人,他们的需求即使在正常情况下也不是系统的优先事项,那些处于社会阶层底层的人,他们无法影响影响其日常生活的政策,也无法影响进一步再现社会不平等的当局的决定。本文通过分析封锁措施的充分性及其对被贩运女童和妇女幸存者的影响,审查了塞尔维亚大流行病期间护理的机构伦理。对女孩和妇女半结构化访谈中收集的数据进行的分析表明,机构(伦理)护理的三个核心要素:护理的目的、对权力关系的认识以及为满足个人需求而对护理进行多元化调整的必要性。这种需求在大流行病期间没有得到满足,机构护理的逻辑在塞尔维亚具有政治化的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信