Qualitative Analysis of Parental Observations on Quality of Life in Australian Children with Down Syndrome

N. Murphy, A. Epstein, H. Leonard, E. Davis, D. Reddihough, A. Whitehouse, P. Jacoby, J. Bourke, Katrina Jane Williams, J. Downs
{"title":"Qualitative Analysis of Parental Observations on Quality of Life in Australian Children with Down Syndrome","authors":"N. Murphy, A. Epstein, H. Leonard, E. Davis, D. Reddihough, A. Whitehouse, P. Jacoby, J. Bourke, Katrina Jane Williams, J. Downs","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Objective: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. Methods: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. Results: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. Conclusion: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.
澳大利亚唐氏综合症儿童父母生活质量观察的定性分析
目的:唐氏综合症儿童的健康、功能和参与面临许多挑战;然而,对这一群体重要的生活质量(QOL)领域从未得到明确阐述。本研究调查了父母的观察,以确定唐氏综合征儿童的生活质量域,并确定这些域在儿童和青少年之间是否存在差异。方法:选取唐氏综合征患儿年龄在6 ~ 18岁的17个家庭为样本。主要照顾者参加了半结构化的电话访谈,以探索孩子生活中令人满意或充满挑战的方面。定性专题分析是使用一个扎根的理论框架来确定领域。将编码后的数据集在3个年龄切割点分为儿童和青少年两组,观察编码域与域元素之间是否存在差异:(1)6 ~ 11岁与12 ~ 18岁;(二)有期徒刑6年以上13年以上,有期徒刑14年以上18年以上;(3) 6至15年,16至18年。结果:确定了11个领域:身体健康、行为和情感、个人价值、沟通、运动和身体活动、常规和可预测性、独立性和自主性、社会联系和关系、活动的多样性、自然和户外活动,以及获得服务的机会。在儿童期和青春期,在领域和领域要素方面没有发现差异。结论:我们的数据形成了一个初步的框架,据此设计儿童对生活质量的看法的调查,并提出一系列必要的支持和服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信