Future Competition Law In Indonesia: Analysis Of The Phenomenon Of Disruptive Innovation

Izzy Al Kautsar
{"title":"Future Competition Law In Indonesia: Analysis Of The Phenomenon Of Disruptive Innovation","authors":"Izzy Al Kautsar","doi":"10.18592/sjhp.v21i2.4448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the legal status of the existence of disruptive innovation in relation to the competition act, as well as outline the policy direction of business competition regulations. In conducting this research the author uses normative research methods, by utilizing secondary data. Legal issues related to business competition in recent years have culminated in the presence of innovations that can change the paradigm of producers and consumers towards market activity habits, which are accustomed to conducting direct transactions. The emergence of modern technology has created a new, fourth industrial revolution that combines automation and computing with the internet of things. Disruptive innovation is able to enable producers to offer their products and services in an easy and effective way through online-based offerings so as to provide consumers with a variety of product choices so that they can determine their needs easily and according to economic capacity. This paradigm shift must be balanced with regulations that can limit the legal corridors that have been adjusted so as to create prosperity for consumers and producers. It can be concluded that the existence of disruptive innovation has made competition acts very intensive, for consumers, making it easier for consumers to make choices according to economic capacity. In connection with the legal politics of business competition regulation, the law must be directed as a means of social control and a means of social engineering in order to make business competition effective and efficient by still paying attention to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution as the basis for policy direction..","PeriodicalId":33523,"journal":{"name":"Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran","volume":"445 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v21i2.4448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal status of the existence of disruptive innovation in relation to the competition act, as well as outline the policy direction of business competition regulations. In conducting this research the author uses normative research methods, by utilizing secondary data. Legal issues related to business competition in recent years have culminated in the presence of innovations that can change the paradigm of producers and consumers towards market activity habits, which are accustomed to conducting direct transactions. The emergence of modern technology has created a new, fourth industrial revolution that combines automation and computing with the internet of things. Disruptive innovation is able to enable producers to offer their products and services in an easy and effective way through online-based offerings so as to provide consumers with a variety of product choices so that they can determine their needs easily and according to economic capacity. This paradigm shift must be balanced with regulations that can limit the legal corridors that have been adjusted so as to create prosperity for consumers and producers. It can be concluded that the existence of disruptive innovation has made competition acts very intensive, for consumers, making it easier for consumers to make choices according to economic capacity. In connection with the legal politics of business competition regulation, the law must be directed as a means of social control and a means of social engineering in order to make business competition effective and efficient by still paying attention to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution as the basis for policy direction..
印尼未来竞争法:颠覆性创新现象分析
本研究旨在分析与竞争法相关的破坏性创新存在的法律地位,并勾勒出商业竞争法规的政策方向。在进行这项研究,作者使用规范的研究方法,利用二手数据。近年来,与商业竞争有关的法律问题在出现创新时达到高潮,这些创新可以改变生产者和消费者对习惯于进行直接交易的市场活动习惯的模式。现代技术的出现创造了一场新的第四次工业革命,它将自动化和计算与物联网相结合。颠覆性创新是指生产者能够通过网络提供产品和服务,以一种简单有效的方式提供产品和服务,从而为消费者提供多种产品选择,使消费者能够轻松地根据经济能力确定自己的需求。这种模式的转变必须与能够限制为为消费者和生产者创造繁荣而调整的法律走廊的法规相平衡。可以得出结论,破坏性创新的存在使得竞争行为非常激烈,对于消费者来说,使得消费者更容易根据经济能力做出选择。在商业竞争监管的法律政治方面,必须将法律作为社会控制的手段和社会工程的手段来指导,以便通过仍然关注1945年宪法第33条作为政策指导的基础,使商业竞争有效和高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信