Bitcoin Vs Gold: Which One is the Most Powerful in Boosting the Shariah Equity Index? Global Evidence

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
Wicaksono Ahmad Tibrizi Soni, Mufraini Arief, Miranti Titis, Muttaqien Muhammad Khaerul
{"title":"Bitcoin Vs Gold: Which One is the Most Powerful in Boosting the Shariah Equity Index? Global Evidence","authors":"Wicaksono Ahmad Tibrizi Soni, Mufraini Arief, Miranti Titis, Muttaqien Muhammad Khaerul","doi":"10.2478/sbe-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study explores the most powerful between Bitcoin and Gold in boosting the Shariah Equity Index in Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates, China, Indonesia, The United States of America (USA), Japan, Oman, and Saudi Arabia in the short and long term. The study uses analysis of the first and second stages of the Granger Causality Test and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), then Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Variance Decomposition (VDC) over the period 2013 to 2021. The finding proves that only Gold can affect the Islamic Equity Index in the short term, then Bitcoin and Gold proved to contribute equally to the Islamic Equity Index in the long term. However, Bitcoin has the potential to provide positively correlated shocks and dominate the value of Islamic equity indices in the long term. The results demonstrate that government intervention is decisive in maintaining the stability of the Shariah Equity Index from future Bitcoin threats. The study’s finding has practical implications for Islamic capital market Investors, Managers, and Authorities.","PeriodicalId":43310,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Business and Economics","volume":"223 1","pages":"5 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The study explores the most powerful between Bitcoin and Gold in boosting the Shariah Equity Index in Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates, China, Indonesia, The United States of America (USA), Japan, Oman, and Saudi Arabia in the short and long term. The study uses analysis of the first and second stages of the Granger Causality Test and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), then Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Variance Decomposition (VDC) over the period 2013 to 2021. The finding proves that only Gold can affect the Islamic Equity Index in the short term, then Bitcoin and Gold proved to contribute equally to the Islamic Equity Index in the long term. However, Bitcoin has the potential to provide positively correlated shocks and dominate the value of Islamic equity indices in the long term. The results demonstrate that government intervention is decisive in maintaining the stability of the Shariah Equity Index from future Bitcoin threats. The study’s finding has practical implications for Islamic capital market Investors, Managers, and Authorities.
比特币Vs黄金:哪个对提振伊斯兰教法股票指数最有力?全球的证据
摘要:本研究探讨了比特币和黄金在短期和长期内对马来西亚、阿拉伯联合酋长国、中国、印度尼西亚、美国、日本、阿曼和沙特阿拉伯的伊斯兰教法股票指数的推动作用。该研究使用了2013年至2021年期间格兰杰因果检验和向量误差修正模型(VECM)的第一和第二阶段分析,然后是脉冲响应函数(IRF)和方差分解(VDC)。这一发现证明,只有黄金可以在短期内影响伊斯兰股票指数,然后比特币和黄金被证明在长期内对伊斯兰股票指数的贡献相同。然而,从长远来看,比特币有可能提供正相关的冲击,并主导伊斯兰股票指数的价值。结果表明,政府干预对于维持伊斯兰教法股票指数的稳定,免受未来比特币的威胁是决定性的。该研究的发现对伊斯兰资本市场的投资者、管理者和当局具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信