Evaluation of the Polymerization Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins

L. Uygun, N. Akgül
{"title":"Evaluation of the Polymerization Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins","authors":"L. Uygun, N. Akgül","doi":"10.22038/JDMT.2021.57660.1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim was to evaluate the polymerization properties of bulk-fill composite resins in terms of the degree of conversion (%DC), Vickers hardness (HV). SonicFill (SF, Kerr, CA, USA), Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk-Fill (TECBF, Ivoclar Vivadent Schaan, Lichtenstein), and X-trafil (XTF, Voco GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) were investigated. Methods: The samples prepared from composites (n = 10)  were polymerized via three different curing modes (standard mode: 20 s, high-power mode: 12 s, extra power mode: 6 s) using a polywave LED. %DC was determined by FTIR-ATR-spectroscopy. HV was measured at the top and bottom of the specimens. Data were analyzed by two way ANOVA, and Bonferroni’s post-hoc respectively (α=0.05). Results: Except TECBF (%41.10 ± 3.1) in three different curing modes, all materials showed no significant inferior %DC. In all curing modes, the highest hardness ratio was found in XTF (0.84 ± 0.03 GPa), and the lowest hardness ratio was found in the TECBF (0.78 ± 0.02GPa). In the cases where the extra power mode of the Valo Led was applied, the lowest degree of conversion and hardness were also measured. Conclusion: It has been observed that the examined properties of some tested materials change with the curing time and power of the light and however, the results are dependent on the material.Extra power mode of the Valo Led negatively affected high viscosity bulk-fill composites in terms of their polymerization properties","PeriodicalId":15640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","volume":"25 1","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2021.57660.1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim was to evaluate the polymerization properties of bulk-fill composite resins in terms of the degree of conversion (%DC), Vickers hardness (HV). SonicFill (SF, Kerr, CA, USA), Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk-Fill (TECBF, Ivoclar Vivadent Schaan, Lichtenstein), and X-trafil (XTF, Voco GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) were investigated. Methods: The samples prepared from composites (n = 10)  were polymerized via three different curing modes (standard mode: 20 s, high-power mode: 12 s, extra power mode: 6 s) using a polywave LED. %DC was determined by FTIR-ATR-spectroscopy. HV was measured at the top and bottom of the specimens. Data were analyzed by two way ANOVA, and Bonferroni’s post-hoc respectively (α=0.05). Results: Except TECBF (%41.10 ± 3.1) in three different curing modes, all materials showed no significant inferior %DC. In all curing modes, the highest hardness ratio was found in XTF (0.84 ± 0.03 GPa), and the lowest hardness ratio was found in the TECBF (0.78 ± 0.02GPa). In the cases where the extra power mode of the Valo Led was applied, the lowest degree of conversion and hardness were also measured. Conclusion: It has been observed that the examined properties of some tested materials change with the curing time and power of the light and however, the results are dependent on the material.Extra power mode of the Valo Led negatively affected high viscosity bulk-fill composites in terms of their polymerization properties
本体填充复合树脂聚合性能的评价
前言:目的是根据转化率(%DC)、维氏硬度(HV)来评价本体填充复合树脂的聚合性能。对SonicFill (SF, Kerr, CA, USA), Tetric Evo Ceram Bulk-Fill (TECBF, Ivoclar Vivadent Schaan,列支敦士登)和X-trafil (XTF, Voco GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany)进行了研究。方法:采用多波LED对n = 10的复合材料进行三种不同固化模式(标准模式:20 s,大功率模式:12 s,超功率模式:6 s)的聚合。用ftir - atr光谱法测定%DC。在样品的顶部和底部测量HV。数据分别采用双因素方差分析(two - way ANOVA)和Bonferroni事后分析(α=0.05)。结果:三种不同固化方式下,除TECBF(%41.10±3.1)外,其余材料DC均无明显下降。在所有固化方式中,XTF的硬度比最高(0.84±0.03 GPa), TECBF的硬度比最低(0.78±0.02GPa)。在使用Valo Led的额外电源模式的情况下,还测量了最低转换程度和硬度。结论:观察到某些被测材料的被测性能随光固化时间和功率的变化而变化,但结果与材料有关。Valo Led的额外功率模式对高粘度体填料复合材料的聚合性能产生了负面影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信