Excess COVID-19 Mortality in India: An Estimation Using the Published Death Rate by the Civil Registration System

Q4 Medicine
Hariprasad Thazhathedath Hariharan, A. T. Surendran
{"title":"Excess COVID-19 Mortality in India: An Estimation Using the Published Death Rate by the Civil Registration System","authors":"Hariprasad Thazhathedath Hariharan, A. T. Surendran","doi":"10.1177/26339447231158202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background An unbiased estimate of the COVID-19 deaths is essential to compare and contrast the public health actions adopted by governments from time to time. It also helps them in their policy-making in the future. But unfortunately, there is gross underreporting of COVID-19 deaths across the world, and also from India, as reported by many researchers, which can be estimated by modelling exercises only. Methods In this article, we estimated the number of COVID-19 deaths among the Indian states using a time series analysis approach with the mortality data published by the civil registration system since 2011. We excluded the trend in non-COVID mortality due to the prevailing causes to prevent it from being counted erroneously as due to COVID-19. Results Accordingly, the number of COVID-19 deaths in India is estimated as 25.8 lakh (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.1L, 35.4L), with Bihar being the largest under-reporter of COVID-19 mortality (98.4% [95% CI: 98.0, 98.7] deaths not reported). On the contrary, there are states with zero underreporting (Kerala, Goa, Mizoram, Sikkim, and all the union territories). We also found out that the measures of social and economic development, like the multidimensional poverty index, infant mortality, literacy rate, per capita state domestic product, and the NITI Aayog Health Index, are significantly correlated to the proportion of underreporting. Discussion and Conclusion The underreporting of COVID-19 deaths in India is very much linked to its social and economic development. There is intentional nonreporting of the deaths of children, women, and the poor for a much longer period of time. Poor quality of data-grabbing mechanisms, the social stigma associated with the disease, inadequate testing of the population, the inefficiency of the administration, and omission of the socially and economically vulnerable groups had intensified the scenario.","PeriodicalId":40062,"journal":{"name":"Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"17 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26339447231158202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background An unbiased estimate of the COVID-19 deaths is essential to compare and contrast the public health actions adopted by governments from time to time. It also helps them in their policy-making in the future. But unfortunately, there is gross underreporting of COVID-19 deaths across the world, and also from India, as reported by many researchers, which can be estimated by modelling exercises only. Methods In this article, we estimated the number of COVID-19 deaths among the Indian states using a time series analysis approach with the mortality data published by the civil registration system since 2011. We excluded the trend in non-COVID mortality due to the prevailing causes to prevent it from being counted erroneously as due to COVID-19. Results Accordingly, the number of COVID-19 deaths in India is estimated as 25.8 lakh (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.1L, 35.4L), with Bihar being the largest under-reporter of COVID-19 mortality (98.4% [95% CI: 98.0, 98.7] deaths not reported). On the contrary, there are states with zero underreporting (Kerala, Goa, Mizoram, Sikkim, and all the union territories). We also found out that the measures of social and economic development, like the multidimensional poverty index, infant mortality, literacy rate, per capita state domestic product, and the NITI Aayog Health Index, are significantly correlated to the proportion of underreporting. Discussion and Conclusion The underreporting of COVID-19 deaths in India is very much linked to its social and economic development. There is intentional nonreporting of the deaths of children, women, and the poor for a much longer period of time. Poor quality of data-grabbing mechanisms, the social stigma associated with the disease, inadequate testing of the population, the inefficiency of the administration, and omission of the socially and economically vulnerable groups had intensified the scenario.
印度COVID-19死亡率过高:使用民事登记系统公布的死亡率进行估计
对COVID-19死亡人数进行公正的估计对于比较和对比各国政府不时采取的公共卫生行动至关重要。这也有助于他们未来的决策。但不幸的是,正如许多研究人员所报告的那样,世界各地和印度的COVID-19死亡人数严重少报,这只能通过建模练习来估计。在本文中,我们利用2011年以来民事登记系统公布的死亡率数据,采用时间序列分析方法估计了印度各邦的COVID-19死亡人数。我们排除了主要原因导致的非COVID-19死亡率的趋势,以防止其被错误地计算为COVID-19。因此,印度COVID-19死亡人数估计为258万人(95%置信区间[CI]: 11.1L, 35.4L),比哈尔邦是COVID-19死亡率报告不足最多的地区(98.4% [95% CI: 98.0, 98.7]未报告死亡)。相反,有些邦没有漏报(喀拉拉邦、果阿邦、米佐拉姆邦、锡金和所有联邦属地)。我们还发现,社会和经济发展指标,如多维贫困指数、婴儿死亡率、识字率、人均国家国内生产总值和NITI Aayog健康指数,与漏报比例显著相关。在印度,COVID-19死亡人数的低报与其社会和经济发展密切相关。在很长一段时间内,故意不报告儿童、妇女和穷人的死亡情况。数据获取机制的质量低下、与该疾病有关的社会耻辱、对人口的检测不足、管理效率低下以及对社会和经济上脆弱群体的忽视,都加剧了这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Indian Association of Clinical Medicine is an academic body constituted in the year 1992 by a group of clinicians with the main aim of reaffirming the importance of clinical medicine in this era of high-tech diagnostic modalities. There is no doubt that modern investigational methods have contributed a lot to the present day medical practice but that does not render clinical acumen and examination less important. The art and science of clinical medicine helps up to make proper and judicious use of investigations and not these be the sole basis of our practice. That is the basic idea behind this ''Association''. We presently have members and fellows of the association from all over the country. In August, 2002 the body was registered as "Indian Association of Clinical Medicine" by the Registrar of Societies, Delhi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信