Less talk, more action

IF 1.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Simpson, L. Salter, Rituparna Roy, Luke D. Oldfield, Apriel D. Jolliffe Simpson
{"title":"Less talk, more action","authors":"A. Simpson, L. Salter, Rituparna Roy, Luke D. Oldfield, Apriel D. Jolliffe Simpson","doi":"10.3167/latiss.2023.160206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDespite the growing size of the academic precariat in the tertiary sector, this exploited group of workers lacks a voice in either their universities or their national union. In this article we draw on our experiences of transitioning from a small activist group to a broader research collective with influence and voice, while forging networks of solidarity. Through reflecting on developing the Precarious Academic Work Survey (PAWS), we explore how action research is a viable way of structurally and politically (re)organising academic work. We argue that partnering with changemakers such as unions as co-researchers disrupts their embedded processes so that they may be (re)politicised towards pressing issues such as precarity. Further, we highlight how research can be used as a call to action and a tool to recruit powerful allies to collaborate on transforming universities into educational utopias.","PeriodicalId":45061,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2023.160206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the growing size of the academic precariat in the tertiary sector, this exploited group of workers lacks a voice in either their universities or their national union. In this article we draw on our experiences of transitioning from a small activist group to a broader research collective with influence and voice, while forging networks of solidarity. Through reflecting on developing the Precarious Academic Work Survey (PAWS), we explore how action research is a viable way of structurally and politically (re)organising academic work. We argue that partnering with changemakers such as unions as co-researchers disrupts their embedded processes so that they may be (re)politicised towards pressing issues such as precarity. Further, we highlight how research can be used as a call to action and a tool to recruit powerful allies to collaborate on transforming universities into educational utopias.
少说空话,多行动
尽管第三产业的学术不稳定阶层的规模越来越大,但这群被剥削的工人在他们的大学或国家工会中都缺乏发言权。在这篇文章中,我们借鉴了我们的经验,从一个小的活动家团体过渡到一个更广泛的研究集体,具有影响力和发言权,同时建立团结的网络。通过对发展不稳定学术工作调查(PAWS)的反思,我们探讨了行动研究如何成为一种结构上和政治上(重新)组织学术工作的可行方式。我们认为,与工会等变革者合作,作为共同研究人员,破坏了他们的内在流程,使他们可能(重新)政治化,以解决诸如不稳定等紧迫问题。此外,我们强调如何利用研究作为行动呼吁和招募强大盟友的工具,合作将大学转变为教育乌托邦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT
Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信