Is Family Group Conferencing a Culturally Adequate Method outside the Origin of New Zealand? A Systematic Review

Q3 Social Sciences
Reidunn H Nygård, M. Saus
{"title":"Is Family Group Conferencing a Culturally Adequate Method outside the Origin of New Zealand? A Systematic Review","authors":"Reidunn H Nygård, M. Saus","doi":"10.1921/SWSSR.V20I1.1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally assumed that Family Group Conference (FGC) is a culturally adequate method for social work in indigenous communities.  In this meta-synthesis, we question this assumption.  Through systematic and strategic searches, we explored the existing trends of FGC research in indigenous contexts.  We have included 26 articles are included in the literature review.  Our analyses reveal that there is a tendency towards taking the cultural adequacy of FGC for granted.  A few researchers question these assumptions, and debate tokenism and colonialism in social work.  We argue that implementing FGC in new communities requires foundation in local, cultural context. ","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"271 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/SWSSR.V20I1.1164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is generally assumed that Family Group Conference (FGC) is a culturally adequate method for social work in indigenous communities.  In this meta-synthesis, we question this assumption.  Through systematic and strategic searches, we explored the existing trends of FGC research in indigenous contexts.  We have included 26 articles are included in the literature review.  Our analyses reveal that there is a tendency towards taking the cultural adequacy of FGC for granted.  A few researchers question these assumptions, and debate tokenism and colonialism in social work.  We argue that implementing FGC in new communities requires foundation in local, cultural context. 
家庭小组会议在新西兰以外是一种文化上适当的方法吗?系统回顾
一般认为,家庭小组会议(FGC)是土著社区社会工作在文化上适当的方法。在这个综合研究中,我们质疑这个假设。通过系统的、战略性的研究,我们探索了本土语境下FGC研究的现有趋势。我们在文献综述中纳入了26篇文章。我们的分析表明,有一种倾向认为FGC的文化充分性是理所当然的。一些研究人员质疑这些假设,并争论社会工作中的象征主义和殖民主义。我们认为,在新社区实施FGC需要在当地文化背景下建立基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信