Depreciation allowances for tax purposes in periods of less than a year

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
R. Nel
{"title":"Depreciation allowances for tax purposes in periods of less than a year","authors":"R. Nel","doi":"10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In tax legislation, a depreciation allowance is applied in three provisions and results in a reduction of taxable amounts. A depreciation allowance is calculated for the period an employer owned a vehicle prior to granting the right of use to an employee (paragraph 7(1) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act and section 10(13) of the Value-Added Tax Act) or the period an asset was leased prior to acquisition by the lessee (section 8(5)(bB) of the Income Tax Act). Both periods could consist of or include a period of less than a year. The uncertainty of interest in this article is whether a depreciation allowance should be disregarded or not when a period of less than a year is concerned. The tax implications, wording, and context of the three tax provisions were considered with due regard for the limited current guidance offered by the SARS. The findings of this article suggest that a taxpayer following current guidance in the application of all three tax provisions would not be correct. In line with current guidance relating to paragraph 7(1) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act, the depreciation allowance contemplated in section 10(13) of the Value-Added Tax Act should disregard a period of less than a year. Contrary to current guidance, the different context of the depreciation allowance contemplated in section 8(5)(bB) of the Income Tax Act is argued as affording the opportunity to apply the depreciation allowance when a period of less than a year is concerned. A depreciation allowance applied for a period of less than a year would result in a lower recoupment for inclusion in taxable income for normal tax purposes and, as a result, argued as beneficial to taxpayers.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In tax legislation, a depreciation allowance is applied in three provisions and results in a reduction of taxable amounts. A depreciation allowance is calculated for the period an employer owned a vehicle prior to granting the right of use to an employee (paragraph 7(1) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act and section 10(13) of the Value-Added Tax Act) or the period an asset was leased prior to acquisition by the lessee (section 8(5)(bB) of the Income Tax Act). Both periods could consist of or include a period of less than a year. The uncertainty of interest in this article is whether a depreciation allowance should be disregarded or not when a period of less than a year is concerned. The tax implications, wording, and context of the three tax provisions were considered with due regard for the limited current guidance offered by the SARS. The findings of this article suggest that a taxpayer following current guidance in the application of all three tax provisions would not be correct. In line with current guidance relating to paragraph 7(1) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act, the depreciation allowance contemplated in section 10(13) of the Value-Added Tax Act should disregard a period of less than a year. Contrary to current guidance, the different context of the depreciation allowance contemplated in section 8(5)(bB) of the Income Tax Act is argued as affording the opportunity to apply the depreciation allowance when a period of less than a year is concerned. A depreciation allowance applied for a period of less than a year would result in a lower recoupment for inclusion in taxable income for normal tax purposes and, as a result, argued as beneficial to taxpayers.
一年以内的计提折旧免税额
在税收立法中,折旧津贴在三个条款中适用,并导致应纳税金额的减少。折旧免税额的计算时间是雇主在授予雇员使用权之前拥有车辆的时间(《所得税法》附表7第7(1)段和《增值税法案》第10(13)条)或承租人在获得资产之前租赁资产的时间(《所得税法》第8(5)(bB)条)。这两个时期都可以由一年以下的时期组成或包括一年以下的时期。本条款的不确定性在于,当涉及不到一年的期间时,是否应忽略折旧准备。在考虑了三项税收规定的税务含义、措辞和背景后,适当考虑了SARS提供的有限的现行指导。本文的研究结果表明,纳税人在应用所有三项税收规定时遵循现行指导是不正确的。根据《所得税法》附表7第7(1)段的现行指导,《增值税法》第10(13)条规定的折旧免税额应不考虑少于一年的期限。与目前的指导意见相反,《所得税法》第8(5)(bB)条所设想的折旧津贴的不同背景被认为提供了在不到一年的时间内应用折旧津贴的机会。在不到一年的时间内申请折旧津贴将导致较低的补偿,以列入正常税收目的的应税收入,因此,被认为对纳税人有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信