The effectiveness of whole-body vibration on the attenuation of delayed-onset muscle soreness in healthy untrained individuals: a randomised controlled trial

IF 0.6 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES

Comparative Exercise Physiology Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.3920/cep220024

A. Dabbagh, F. K. Sarvestani

{"title":"The effectiveness of whole-body vibration on the attenuation of delayed-onset muscle soreness in healthy untrained individuals: a randomised controlled trial","authors":"A. Dabbagh, F. K. Sarvestani","doi":"10.3920/cep220024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a condition that happens following eccentric or intensive exercises. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a potential treatment for DOMS; however, there is a lack of studies assessing its effectiveness in the untrained population. Our study objective was to test the efficacy of WBV compared with no treatment on pain and knee strength in healthy adults with DOMS. We randomly allocated 52 participants, 12 men and 40 women, aged 18 to 28 years, into WBV (n=26) and control (n=26) groups. The eligibility criteria included no history of injury, strengthening or aerobic exercises within the past six months. The participants walked on a treadmill to introduce DOMS. 24 h later, the WBV group received one session of WBV treatment, with their knees bent to 60° for 1 min (frequency, 30 Hz; amplitude 2-5 mm). We assessed pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analogue scale (VAS), and knee maximum isometric force (MIF) at four time points. We did a one-way repeated measures ANOVA of each outcome measure, followed by a t-test and Bonferroni post-hoc test. The between-group differences were not significant at the baseline and 24 h post-DOMS (P>0.05). Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the two groups for all variables at 96 h post-DOMS inducement (P<0.05), with mean differences for PPT, MIF and VAS being 1.19 kilo Pascals (95%CI = 0.78-1.32), 42.87 Newtons (95%CI = 28.53-56.98), and -2.39 (95%CI = -3.13- -1.98), respectively. Moreover, differences between the two groups were statistically significant for MIF 168 h post-DOMS (P<0.05). WBV can effectively improve pain and muscle strength; therefore, beneficial treatment for recovery of DOMS symptoms. However, determining the exact dose, frequency, and best time of application is pending future research. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials registration number: IRCT2016092429958N1","PeriodicalId":10709,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is a condition that happens following eccentric or intensive exercises. Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a potential treatment for DOMS; however, there is a lack of studies assessing its effectiveness in the untrained population. Our study objective was to test the efficacy of WBV compared with no treatment on pain and knee strength in healthy adults with DOMS. We randomly allocated 52 participants, 12 men and 40 women, aged 18 to 28 years, into WBV (n=26) and control (n=26) groups. The eligibility criteria included no history of injury, strengthening or aerobic exercises within the past six months. The participants walked on a treadmill to introduce DOMS. 24 h later, the WBV group received one session of WBV treatment, with their knees bent to 60° for 1 min (frequency, 30 Hz; amplitude 2-5 mm). We assessed pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analogue scale (VAS), and knee maximum isometric force (MIF) at four time points. We did a one-way repeated measures ANOVA of each outcome measure, followed by a t-test and Bonferroni post-hoc test. The between-group differences were not significant at the baseline and 24 h post-DOMS (P>0.05). Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the two groups for all variables at 96 h post-DOMS inducement (P<0.05), with mean differences for PPT, MIF and VAS being 1.19 kilo Pascals (95%CI = 0.78-1.32), 42.87 Newtons (95%CI = 28.53-56.98), and -2.39 (95%CI = -3.13- -1.98), respectively. Moreover, differences between the two groups were statistically significant for MIF 168 h post-DOMS (P<0.05). WBV can effectively improve pain and muscle strength; therefore, beneficial treatment for recovery of DOMS symptoms. However, determining the exact dose, frequency, and best time of application is pending future research. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials registration number: IRCT2016092429958N1

查看原文本刊更多论文

在未经训练的健康个体中，全身振动对迟发性肌肉酸痛衰减的有效性:一项随机对照试验

迟发性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)是一种发生在离心或高强度运动后的情况。全身振动(WBV)是一种潜在的治疗迟发性肌肉酸痛的方法;然而，缺乏评估其在未受过训练的人群中的有效性的研究。我们的研究目的是测试WBV与未治疗相比对健康成人迟发性肌肉酸痛和膝关节力量的疗效。我们将52名参与者随机分为WBV组(n=26)和对照组(n=26)，其中男性12名，女性40名，年龄18 ~ 28岁。入选标准包括在过去6个月内无受伤史，无强化或有氧运动史。参与者在跑步机上行走以介绍迟发性肌肉酸痛。24 h后，WBV组接受1次WBV治疗，膝关节弯曲至60°1 min(频率，30 Hz;振幅2-5毫米)。我们在四个时间点评估压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和膝关节最大等距力(MIF)。我们对每个结果测量进行了单向重复测量方差分析，随后进行了t检验和Bonferroni事后检验。在基线和迟发性肌肉酸痛后24 h组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经统计学分析，两组在迟发性肌肉酸痛96 h时各指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)， PPT、MIF和VAS的平均差异分别为1.19千帕斯卡(95%CI = 0.78 ~ 1.32)、42.87牛顿(95%CI = 28.53 ~ 56.98)和-2.39牛顿(95%CI = -3.13 ~ -1.98)。此外，两组在doms后168 h的MIF差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。WBV能有效改善疼痛和肌肉力量;因此，有利于治疗DOMS症状的恢复。然而，确定确切的剂量、频率和最佳应用时间有待于未来的研究。伊朗临床试验注册中心注册号:IRCT2016092429958N1

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Comparative Exercise Physiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： ''Comparative Exercise Physiology'' is the only international peer-reviewed scientific journal specifically dealing with the latest research in exercise physiology across all animal species, including humans. The major objective of the journal is to use this comparative approach to better understand the physiological, nutritional, and biochemical parameters that determine levels of performance and athletic achievement. Core subjects include exercise physiology, biomechanics, gait (including the effect of riders in equestrian sport), nutrition and biochemistry, injury and rehabilitation, psychology and behaviour, and breeding and genetics. This comparative and integrative approach to exercise science ultimately highlights the similarities as well as the differences between humans, horses, dogs, and other athletic or non-athletic species during exercise. The result is a unique forum for new information that serves as a resource for all who want to understand the physiological challenges with exercise.