Unemployment, total factor productivity, budget deficit, and wage share in South Africa

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
J. Marire
{"title":"Unemployment, total factor productivity, budget deficit, and wage share in South Africa","authors":"J. Marire","doi":"10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss2.art4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose ― The paper investigated the effect of the interaction of fiscal deficits and total factor productivity (TFP) and fiscal deficits and the wage share on unemployment.\nMethods ― The paper applied an autoregressive distributed lag model to South African annual data from 1991-2019.\nFindings ― First, increases in fiscal deficits increase unemployment at all levels of TFP and wage share. Second, increases in TFP increase unemployment at different levels of fiscal deficit, but after the global economic recession, the rate of increase in unemployment declined significantly. This means that the interaction of rising TFP and fiscal deficits in South Africa, where the growth regime is profit-led and technology-driven, always results in increasing unemployment. Third, as the wage share increases, unemployment increases, at all levels of fiscal deficits, suggesting that a wage-led growth regime is no panacea to unemployment either.\nImplications ― The findings imply that expansionary fiscal policy does not necessarily create an economy that works for all unless active labour market institutions are set up. The findings challenge the notion that the solution to unemployment in South Africa is wage flexibility. Neither do the findings support the idea that following a profit-led growth path is a solution. A balanced mix of the two growth regimes would work.\nOriginality ― Studies have considered the productivity-enhancing effects of structural fiscal policy, but they have not considered the possible effects of interactions between productivity, fiscal policy and wage shares. The paper addresses the gap by introducing the interactions of TFP and fiscal deficits, as well as the interaction of wage share and fiscal deficits.","PeriodicalId":41472,"journal":{"name":"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss2.art4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose ― The paper investigated the effect of the interaction of fiscal deficits and total factor productivity (TFP) and fiscal deficits and the wage share on unemployment. Methods ― The paper applied an autoregressive distributed lag model to South African annual data from 1991-2019. Findings ― First, increases in fiscal deficits increase unemployment at all levels of TFP and wage share. Second, increases in TFP increase unemployment at different levels of fiscal deficit, but after the global economic recession, the rate of increase in unemployment declined significantly. This means that the interaction of rising TFP and fiscal deficits in South Africa, where the growth regime is profit-led and technology-driven, always results in increasing unemployment. Third, as the wage share increases, unemployment increases, at all levels of fiscal deficits, suggesting that a wage-led growth regime is no panacea to unemployment either. Implications ― The findings imply that expansionary fiscal policy does not necessarily create an economy that works for all unless active labour market institutions are set up. The findings challenge the notion that the solution to unemployment in South Africa is wage flexibility. Neither do the findings support the idea that following a profit-led growth path is a solution. A balanced mix of the two growth regimes would work. Originality ― Studies have considered the productivity-enhancing effects of structural fiscal policy, but they have not considered the possible effects of interactions between productivity, fiscal policy and wage shares. The paper addresses the gap by introducing the interactions of TFP and fiscal deficits, as well as the interaction of wage share and fiscal deficits.
南非的失业率、全要素生产率、预算赤字和工资份额
目的:研究财政赤字与全要素生产率(TFP)、财政赤字与工资占比的相互作用对失业率的影响。方法:本文对南非1991-2019年的年度数据应用了自回归分布滞后模型。研究发现:首先,财政赤字的增加增加了全要素生产率和工资占比各个层面的失业率。第二,在不同财政赤字水平下,TFP的增加会增加失业率,但在全球经济衰退后,失业率的增长率明显下降。这意味着,南非的增长体制是由利润主导和技术驱动的,TFP上升和财政赤字的相互作用总是导致失业率上升。第三,无论财政赤字水平如何,随着工资占比的增加,失业率也会上升,这表明,工资主导的增长机制也不是解决失业问题的灵丹妙药。启示-研究结果表明,除非建立积极的劳动力市场制度,否则扩张性财政政策不一定能创造一个对所有人都有效的经济。研究结果挑战了南非解决失业问题的办法是工资弹性的观念。研究结果也不支持以下观点,即遵循利润导向的增长路径是一种解决方案。两种增长机制的平衡组合将会奏效。独创性——研究已经考虑了结构性财政政策的生产率提高效应,但他们没有考虑生产率、财政政策和工资份额之间相互作用的可能影响。本文通过引入TFP与财政赤字的相互作用,以及工资份额与财政赤字的相互作用来解决这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信