Rebooting Britain: How the UK Economy Can Recover from Coronavirus

J. Jessop, J. Shackleton
{"title":"Rebooting Britain: How the UK Economy Can Recover from Coronavirus","authors":"J. Jessop, J. Shackleton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3851983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The uncertainty created by the COVID-19 has reinvigorated old debates about the role of the state, highlighting the flexibility of private businesses and civil society and illustrating weaknesses in state planning. The UK healthcare system has struggled to keep up with those in other countries, where market forces play a bigger part. Business activity has further slumped during lockdown, as many businesses simply cannot operate in the new world of social distancing and suffer severe reductions in output. However, if markets are liberalised and allowed to operate freely, the recovery may be quicker than many think. This could mean eliminating occupational rules that reduce labour market flexibility and employment obligations that reduce job opportunities. Another way of rebuilding a prosperous economy is to restore full employment, and not to price workers out of jobs or disincentivise them from seeking work by increasing taxes on individuals and corporations. The fiscal costs of the crisis could be manageable without tax increases. Government borrowing will shrink again as the economy recovers and the emergency fiscal measures are wound down. The gradual easing of restrictions and the return of consumer and business confidence could suffice to kickstart the economy. The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) has played a valuable role in protecting jobs and incomes in the short run, but it is expensive and distortionary, and there are dangers in keeping defunct businesses on life support.","PeriodicalId":13563,"journal":{"name":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3851983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uncertainty created by the COVID-19 has reinvigorated old debates about the role of the state, highlighting the flexibility of private businesses and civil society and illustrating weaknesses in state planning. The UK healthcare system has struggled to keep up with those in other countries, where market forces play a bigger part. Business activity has further slumped during lockdown, as many businesses simply cannot operate in the new world of social distancing and suffer severe reductions in output. However, if markets are liberalised and allowed to operate freely, the recovery may be quicker than many think. This could mean eliminating occupational rules that reduce labour market flexibility and employment obligations that reduce job opportunities. Another way of rebuilding a prosperous economy is to restore full employment, and not to price workers out of jobs or disincentivise them from seeking work by increasing taxes on individuals and corporations. The fiscal costs of the crisis could be manageable without tax increases. Government borrowing will shrink again as the economy recovers and the emergency fiscal measures are wound down. The gradual easing of restrictions and the return of consumer and business confidence could suffice to kickstart the economy. The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) has played a valuable role in protecting jobs and incomes in the short run, but it is expensive and distortionary, and there are dangers in keeping defunct businesses on life support.
重启英国:英国经济如何从冠状病毒中复苏
COVID-19造成的不确定性重新激起了关于国家作用的旧辩论,凸显了私营企业和民间社会的灵活性,并暴露了国家规划的弱点。英国的医疗体系一直难以跟上市场力量发挥更大作用的其他国家的医疗体系。在封锁期间,商业活动进一步下滑,因为许多企业根本无法在保持社交距离的新世界中运营,产出严重减少。然而,如果市场自由化并允许自由运作,复苏可能比许多人想象的要快。这可能意味着取消降低劳动力市场灵活性的职业规则和减少就业机会的就业义务。重建繁荣经济的另一种方式是恢复充分就业,而不是通过增加个人和公司的税收来让工人失去工作或抑制他们找工作的积极性。在不增税的情况下,危机的财政成本是可控的。随着经济复苏和紧急财政措施逐渐结束,政府借款将再次萎缩。限制的逐步放松以及消费者和企业信心的恢复可能足以启动经济。冠状病毒就业保留计划(CJRS)在短期内保护就业和收入方面发挥了宝贵作用,但它既昂贵又扭曲,而且让倒闭的企业继续维持生命存在危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信