Hedges in English and Arabic Metadiscourse Utility in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Analysis

Kheryadi Kheryadi, A. Muin, A. Syahid
{"title":"Hedges in English and Arabic Metadiscourse Utility in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Analysis","authors":"Kheryadi Kheryadi, A. Muin, A. Syahid","doi":"10.24042/albayan.v14i2.12144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This current study has increased the amount of studies on metadiscourse features in English and Arabic, as well as cultural groupings, by examining the usage of hedging in linguistic research articles published in English and Arabic. The technique was qualitative, with a corpus of 40 articles from six linguistics journals used. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the use of hedges in native English and native Arabic linguistics research publications. Hyland's taxonomy of metadiscourse markers was used to analyze the language categories. The contrastive analysis of English and Arabic in this article was a systematic investigation of language pairs to uncover differences and similarities. Arabic articles are not more dominant than English articles in the Hidges structure. The result showed that hedges in English is greater than in Arabic research articles. From those findings, it might have a substantial influence on the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language in English context.","PeriodicalId":33142,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v14i2.12144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This current study has increased the amount of studies on metadiscourse features in English and Arabic, as well as cultural groupings, by examining the usage of hedging in linguistic research articles published in English and Arabic. The technique was qualitative, with a corpus of 40 articles from six linguistics journals used. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the use of hedges in native English and native Arabic linguistics research publications. Hyland's taxonomy of metadiscourse markers was used to analyze the language categories. The contrastive analysis of English and Arabic in this article was a systematic investigation of language pairs to uncover differences and similarities. Arabic articles are not more dominant than English articles in the Hidges structure. The result showed that hedges in English is greater than in Arabic research articles. From those findings, it might have a substantial influence on the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language in English context.
英语和阿拉伯语限制语在学术写作中的元话语效用对比分析
本研究通过考察以英语和阿拉伯语发表的语言学研究文章中限制语的使用情况,增加了对英语和阿拉伯语元话语特征以及文化分组的研究数量。该技术是定性的,使用了来自6个语言学期刊的40篇文章的语料库。本研究旨在确定母语英语和母语阿拉伯语语言学研究出版物中模糊限制语使用的异同。运用Hyland的元话语标记分类法对语言范畴进行分析。本文对英语和阿拉伯语的对比分析是对语言对的系统考察,以发现两者的异同。在希吉斯结构中,阿拉伯语冠词并不比英语冠词更占优势。结果表明,英语研究论文中的模糊限制语比阿拉伯语研究论文中的模糊限制语要多。从这些发现来看,它可能会对英语背景下阿拉伯语作为外语的教学产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信