A comparative analysis in equalization

A. Grover, Neeti Grover, Keshav Kumar
{"title":"A comparative analysis in equalization","authors":"A. Grover, Neeti Grover, Keshav Kumar","doi":"10.1109/ICEVENT.2013.6496542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demand of wireless communication systems has been increased to greater extent because of offering high throughput, wide coverage, and improved reliability. One of the approaches to achieve these is MIMO systems that can efficiently boost the data transmission rate and improves the system coverage by considering multiple numbers of transmitter and receiver antennas and employing the spatial dimensions. This article focuses on the comparison of equalization techniques for Rician Flat fading and Rayleigh frequency selective fading channel. The performance of these channels based on BER has been considered and it has been found that Rician Flat Fading Channel is the best and Frequency Selective Channel is the worst. It has also been observed that the MMSE and ZF give the worst performance in Rayleigh frequency selective channel as compare to Rician Flat Fading Channel and Rayleigh Flat fading Channel [35]. By analyzing equalization techniques in terms of BER, It has been observed that the successive interference methods outperform the ZF and MMSE however their complexity is higher due to iterative nature of the algorithms. ML provides the better performance in comparison to others. Sphere decoder provides the best performance and the highest decoding complexity as compare to ML and it is the best suited method to remove ISI in Frequency selective fading channel in MIMO systems.","PeriodicalId":6426,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Emerging Trends in VLSI, Embedded System, Nano Electronics and Telecommunication System (ICEVENT)","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Emerging Trends in VLSI, Embedded System, Nano Electronics and Telecommunication System (ICEVENT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVENT.2013.6496542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The demand of wireless communication systems has been increased to greater extent because of offering high throughput, wide coverage, and improved reliability. One of the approaches to achieve these is MIMO systems that can efficiently boost the data transmission rate and improves the system coverage by considering multiple numbers of transmitter and receiver antennas and employing the spatial dimensions. This article focuses on the comparison of equalization techniques for Rician Flat fading and Rayleigh frequency selective fading channel. The performance of these channels based on BER has been considered and it has been found that Rician Flat Fading Channel is the best and Frequency Selective Channel is the worst. It has also been observed that the MMSE and ZF give the worst performance in Rayleigh frequency selective channel as compare to Rician Flat Fading Channel and Rayleigh Flat fading Channel [35]. By analyzing equalization techniques in terms of BER, It has been observed that the successive interference methods outperform the ZF and MMSE however their complexity is higher due to iterative nature of the algorithms. ML provides the better performance in comparison to others. Sphere decoder provides the best performance and the highest decoding complexity as compare to ML and it is the best suited method to remove ISI in Frequency selective fading channel in MIMO systems.
均衡化的比较分析
由于无线通信系统的高吞吐量、广覆盖和可靠性的提高,对无线通信系统的需求在更大程度上增加了。实现这些目标的方法之一是MIMO系统,它可以有效地提高数据传输速率,并通过考虑多个发射和接收天线并利用空间维度来提高系统覆盖率。本文重点比较了瑞利频率选择性衰落信道和瑞利平坦衰落信道的均衡技术。对基于误码率的信道性能进行了分析,结果表明,平坦衰落信道性能最好,频率选择信道性能最差。也有研究发现,相对于瑞利平坦衰落信道和瑞利平坦衰落信道,MMSE和ZF在瑞利频率选择信道中表现最差[35]。从误码率的角度分析了逐次干扰均衡技术,发现逐次干扰均衡方法优于ZF和MMSE,但由于算法的迭代特性,其复杂度较高。ML提供了比其他机器更好的性能。与ML相比,球面解码器具有最好的性能和最高的解码复杂度,是MIMO系统中去除频率选择性衰落信道ISI的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信