Comparison of effects of hysterectomy at two different timings in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

R. Guo, Mengling Zhao, Yun Feng, Fen-Fen Chu, Miaomiao Zhang, Qian Wang
{"title":"Comparison of effects of hysterectomy at two different timings in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion","authors":"R. Guo, Mengling Zhao, Yun Feng, Fen-Fen Chu, Miaomiao Zhang, Qian Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the curative effects on high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) by performing total hysterectomy (LTH) immediately after fast frozen section examination (FSE) and performing total hysterectomy after fast FSE frozen section examination and conventional pathological determination. \n \n \nMethods \nEighty-four patients with HSIL diagnosed in Pathology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to April 2017 who were going to have total hysterectomy operation were divided into two groups by their own willingness on operation. Patients in one-step operation group were given cervical cold knife conization (CKC) for FSE; if patients were diagnosed as non-cancer by FSE, patients underwent total hysterectomy immediately. Patients in two-step group underwent CKC for FSE first; if patients were diagnosed as non-cancer by FSE, clinicians ended the surgery; then, patients experienced routine pathological examination; if the results of pathological examination proved not to be cancer, patients underwent total hysterectomy; if the FSE showed a cancer result, patients underwent the radical operation of cervical cancer. The hospital stay, treatment coast, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complication, anxiety degree and inappropriate rate of operation were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nCompared to two-step group, one-step group had shorter hospital stay, less hospital coast, lower anxiety degree and shorter time for the first anal exhaust (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nPerforming CKC and total hysterectomy at the same time has more advantages, however, it also has limited accuracy. Therefore, clinicians should attach importance to prevention of inappropriate hysterectomy, and investigation on high-risk of exacerbation of HSIL to guide the formulation of treatment protocol. \n \n \nKey words: \nHysterectomy; High-grade intraepithelial lesion; Treatment; Fast frozen section examination; Conventional paraffin pathology","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the curative effects on high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) by performing total hysterectomy (LTH) immediately after fast frozen section examination (FSE) and performing total hysterectomy after fast FSE frozen section examination and conventional pathological determination. Methods Eighty-four patients with HSIL diagnosed in Pathology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2016 to April 2017 who were going to have total hysterectomy operation were divided into two groups by their own willingness on operation. Patients in one-step operation group were given cervical cold knife conization (CKC) for FSE; if patients were diagnosed as non-cancer by FSE, patients underwent total hysterectomy immediately. Patients in two-step group underwent CKC for FSE first; if patients were diagnosed as non-cancer by FSE, clinicians ended the surgery; then, patients experienced routine pathological examination; if the results of pathological examination proved not to be cancer, patients underwent total hysterectomy; if the FSE showed a cancer result, patients underwent the radical operation of cervical cancer. The hospital stay, treatment coast, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complication, anxiety degree and inappropriate rate of operation were compared between the two groups. Results Compared to two-step group, one-step group had shorter hospital stay, less hospital coast, lower anxiety degree and shorter time for the first anal exhaust (P 0.05). Conclusions Performing CKC and total hysterectomy at the same time has more advantages, however, it also has limited accuracy. Therefore, clinicians should attach importance to prevention of inappropriate hysterectomy, and investigation on high-risk of exacerbation of HSIL to guide the formulation of treatment protocol. Key words: Hysterectomy; High-grade intraepithelial lesion; Treatment; Fast frozen section examination; Conventional paraffin pathology
高度鳞状上皮内病变患者两种不同时间子宫切除术的效果比较
目的比较快速冷冻切片检查(FSE)后立即行全子宫切除术(LTH)与快速冷冻切片检查及常规病理检查后行全子宫切除术(HSIL)的疗效。方法选取2016年1月至2017年4月郑州大学第一附属医院病理科诊断为HSIL并拟行全子宫切除术的患者84例,根据患者本人的手术意愿分为两组。一步手术组采用颈椎冷刀锥切术(CKC)治疗FSE;若经FSE诊断为非癌,则立即行全子宫切除术。两步法组患者首先行CKC治疗FSE;如果患者通过FSE被诊断为非癌症,临床医生结束手术;然后进行常规病理检查;如果病理检查结果证明不是癌症,则行全子宫切除术;如果FSE检查结果为癌,则接受宫颈癌根治性手术。比较两组患者的住院时间、治疗时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、焦虑程度及手术不当率。结果与两步法组相比,一步法组患者住院时间短、住院时间短、焦虑程度低、首次肛门排气时间短(P < 0.05)。结论同时行CKC和全子宫切除术更有优势,但准确性也有限。因此,临床医生应重视预防不适当的子宫切除术,并调查HSIL恶化的高危因素,以指导治疗方案的制定。关键词:子宫切除术;高级别上皮内病变;治疗;速冻切片检查;常规石蜡病理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信