Chemistry laboratory management techniques massive open online course: Development and evaluation on students’ perception

T. Lee, Kung-Teck Wong, N. Daud, I. Zainol, M. I. Damanhuri, Hartono
{"title":"Chemistry laboratory management techniques massive open online course: Development and evaluation on students’ perception","authors":"T. Lee, Kung-Teck Wong, N. Daud, I. Zainol, M. I. Damanhuri, Hartono","doi":"10.37134/EJSMT.VOL7.2.6.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, statistics in OpenLearning have demonstrated that the number of Massive Open Online Courses developed by Malaysia higher education institution is not achieving the target of DePAN 2.0. Hence, this study is aimed at developing a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Chemistry Laboratory Management Techniques (CLMT) course and investigating the students’ perception of the MOOC. The CLMT MOOC is developed by applying the ADDIE model as the instructional design model. In this regard, analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation are the phases involved. Three experts were appointed to evaluate the content validity of the e-content module and e-assessment module in the MOOC by filling the content validity evaluation form. According to the results, both e-content and e-assessment modules obtained validity index of 1.00. A group of 27 students was involved in the pilot study to answer the reliability questionnaire and the Cronbach’s alpha for the two modules was found to be 0.99 and 0.97, respectively. Another group of 152 students were randomly selected as the respondents of the perception survey. Results from perception questionnaire showed the highest mean score in acceptance construct (M = 4.05, SD = 0.54), followed by instructional design construct (M = 3.96, SD = 0.59) and lastly usage barrier construct (M = 3.03, SD = 0.84). In conclusion, both the e-content and e-assessment modules used in the CLMT MOOC are valid and reliable. Meanwhile, the mean score of undergraduate students on the perception toward the CLMT MOOC was found to be moderately higher. Therefore, it can be inferred that this MOOC will be a useful self-learning and flipped classroom platform for the chemistry degree students, especially amidst the outbreak of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":11475,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37134/EJSMT.VOL7.2.6.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To date, statistics in OpenLearning have demonstrated that the number of Massive Open Online Courses developed by Malaysia higher education institution is not achieving the target of DePAN 2.0. Hence, this study is aimed at developing a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Chemistry Laboratory Management Techniques (CLMT) course and investigating the students’ perception of the MOOC. The CLMT MOOC is developed by applying the ADDIE model as the instructional design model. In this regard, analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation are the phases involved. Three experts were appointed to evaluate the content validity of the e-content module and e-assessment module in the MOOC by filling the content validity evaluation form. According to the results, both e-content and e-assessment modules obtained validity index of 1.00. A group of 27 students was involved in the pilot study to answer the reliability questionnaire and the Cronbach’s alpha for the two modules was found to be 0.99 and 0.97, respectively. Another group of 152 students were randomly selected as the respondents of the perception survey. Results from perception questionnaire showed the highest mean score in acceptance construct (M = 4.05, SD = 0.54), followed by instructional design construct (M = 3.96, SD = 0.59) and lastly usage barrier construct (M = 3.03, SD = 0.84). In conclusion, both the e-content and e-assessment modules used in the CLMT MOOC are valid and reliable. Meanwhile, the mean score of undergraduate students on the perception toward the CLMT MOOC was found to be moderately higher. Therefore, it can be inferred that this MOOC will be a useful self-learning and flipped classroom platform for the chemistry degree students, especially amidst the outbreak of COVID-19.
化学实验室管理技术大型网络公开课:学生认知的发展与评价
迄今为止,OpenLearning的统计数据表明,马来西亚高等教育机构开发的大规模开放在线课程的数量没有达到DePAN 2.0的目标。因此,本研究旨在开发一门大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)化学实验室管理技术(CLMT)课程,并调查学生对MOOC的看法。CLMT MOOC是将ADDIE模型作为教学设计模型进行开发的。在这方面,分析、设计、开发、实现和评估是所涉及的阶段。任命3名专家,通过填写内容效度评估表,对MOOC中e-content模块和e-assessment模块的内容效度进行评估。结果表明,电子内容模块和电子评价模块的效度指标均为1.00。27名学生参与了初步研究,回答了信度问卷,两个模块的Cronbach 's alpha分别为0.99和0.97。另一组152名学生被随机选择作为感知调查的受访者。知觉问卷结果显示,接受构念的平均分最高(M = 4.05, SD = 0.54),其次是教学设计构念(M = 3.96, SD = 0.59),最后是使用障碍构念(M = 3.03, SD = 0.84)。综上所述,CLMT MOOC所使用的e-content和e-assessment模块都是有效可靠的。与此同时,本科生对CLMT MOOC的感知平均得分略高。因此,可以推断,该MOOC将成为化学学位学生的一个有用的自学和翻转课堂平台,特别是在COVID-19爆发的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信