Perceptions towards integrated care through the narrative of practicing social workers and psychologists in PHC: a cross-case analysis

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
N. Ryapolova, J. Galea, Karah Y. Greene
{"title":"Perceptions towards integrated care through the narrative of practicing social workers and psychologists in PHC: a cross-case analysis","authors":"N. Ryapolova, J. Galea, Karah Y. Greene","doi":"10.1108/jica-08-2022-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn a collective effort to build a patient-centered and coordinated health care system, social workers and psychologists are being progressively introduced to primary health care (PHC) settings worldwide. The present study aims to explore the current status of integration through the narrative of social workers and psychologists in PHC settings in Kazakhstan.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper purposive snowball sampling was utilized to recruit social workers and psychologists who work, or used to work, in PHC settings since the onset of integration in Nur-Sultan for participation in an in-depth interview. A semistructured interview guide was based on normalization process theory (NPT). Interviews were conducted via video conference, in Russian language, lasted no more than 50 min, and transcribed verbatim. Cross-case analysis of eight cases was performed using NPT constructs.FindingsCross-case analysis included findings from the interviews from five social workers and three psychologists. Four major constructs of implementation process from NPT were reflected in the findings: coherence (believes integration improves patient care, functions within integrated care), cognitive participation (individual changes to role performance, mechanisms of work), collective action (status of support from stakeholders, cooperation within a multidisciplinary team) and reflective monitoring (existing mechanisms for monitoring the integration).Research limitations/implicationsDespite organizational integration, there is a lack of successful clinical integration of social workers and psychologists in PHC settings of Kazakhstan, which is manifested by a lack of understanding of responsibilities and functions of these mental health care specialists. Consensus was reached by all participants that both social workers and psychologists are valuable assets in a multidisciplinary team.Originality/valueThe present study contributes to the current knowledge of integrated PHC service delivery by addressing the status of integrated care in Kazakhstan from interviews with key stakeholders in social work and mental health. Moving forward, improvements are needed to (1) establish the monitoring mechanism to evaluate the status of integration, (2) enhance effective collaboration within multidisciplinary teams in PHC settings and (3) increase awareness among medical workers and community members on mental health issues and the available support offered by social workers and psychologists to promote quality of life in a holistic, integrated manner.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"58 2 Suppl 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-08-2022-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn a collective effort to build a patient-centered and coordinated health care system, social workers and psychologists are being progressively introduced to primary health care (PHC) settings worldwide. The present study aims to explore the current status of integration through the narrative of social workers and psychologists in PHC settings in Kazakhstan.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper purposive snowball sampling was utilized to recruit social workers and psychologists who work, or used to work, in PHC settings since the onset of integration in Nur-Sultan for participation in an in-depth interview. A semistructured interview guide was based on normalization process theory (NPT). Interviews were conducted via video conference, in Russian language, lasted no more than 50 min, and transcribed verbatim. Cross-case analysis of eight cases was performed using NPT constructs.FindingsCross-case analysis included findings from the interviews from five social workers and three psychologists. Four major constructs of implementation process from NPT were reflected in the findings: coherence (believes integration improves patient care, functions within integrated care), cognitive participation (individual changes to role performance, mechanisms of work), collective action (status of support from stakeholders, cooperation within a multidisciplinary team) and reflective monitoring (existing mechanisms for monitoring the integration).Research limitations/implicationsDespite organizational integration, there is a lack of successful clinical integration of social workers and psychologists in PHC settings of Kazakhstan, which is manifested by a lack of understanding of responsibilities and functions of these mental health care specialists. Consensus was reached by all participants that both social workers and psychologists are valuable assets in a multidisciplinary team.Originality/valueThe present study contributes to the current knowledge of integrated PHC service delivery by addressing the status of integrated care in Kazakhstan from interviews with key stakeholders in social work and mental health. Moving forward, improvements are needed to (1) establish the monitoring mechanism to evaluate the status of integration, (2) enhance effective collaboration within multidisciplinary teams in PHC settings and (3) increase awareness among medical workers and community members on mental health issues and the available support offered by social workers and psychologists to promote quality of life in a holistic, integrated manner.
通过初级保健实践社会工作者和心理学家的叙述对综合护理的看法:交叉案例分析
为了共同努力建立一个以病人为中心和协调的卫生保健系统,社会工作者和心理学家正在逐步被引入世界各地的初级卫生保健(PHC)机构。本研究旨在通过社会工作者和心理学家在哈萨克斯坦初级保健机构的叙述来探讨融合的现状。设计/方法/方法在本文中,有目的的雪球抽样被用来招募自努尔苏丹开始融入社会以来在初级保健机构工作或曾经工作过的社会工作者和心理学家参与深度访谈。基于规范化过程理论(NPT)设计了半结构化访谈指南。采访是通过视像会议进行的,以俄语进行,持续时间不超过50分钟,并逐字记录。使用NPT结构对8例病例进行了交叉病例分析。交叉案例分析包括五位社会工作者和三位心理学家的访谈结果。研究结果反映了NPT实施过程的四个主要结构:一致性(认为整合改善了患者护理,整合护理中的功能),认知参与(个人对角色表现的改变,工作机制),集体行动(利益相关者的支持状况,多学科团队内的合作)和反思性监测(监测整合的现有机制)。研究局限/影响尽管组织整合,但哈萨克斯坦初级保健机构的社会工作者和心理学家缺乏成功的临床整合,这表现为缺乏对这些精神卫生保健专家的责任和职能的理解。与会者一致认为,社会工作者和心理学家都是多学科团队的宝贵资产。原创性/价值本研究通过对社会工作和心理健康领域主要利益相关者的访谈,解决了哈萨克斯坦综合护理的现状,从而有助于了解综合初级保健服务的提供情况。展望未来,需要改进:(1)建立监测机制来评估整合状况,(2)加强初级保健机构多学科团队之间的有效合作,(3)提高医务工作者和社区成员对心理健康问题的认识,以及社会工作者和心理学家提供的可用支持,以整体、综合的方式提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信