Fluid Sampling in Tight Unconventionals

M. Carlsen, C. H. Whitson, A. Alavian, S. Martinsen, S. Mydland, Kameshwar Singh, Bilal Younus, Ilina Yusra
{"title":"Fluid Sampling in Tight Unconventionals","authors":"M. Carlsen, C. H. Whitson, A. Alavian, S. Martinsen, S. Mydland, Kameshwar Singh, Bilal Younus, Ilina Yusra","doi":"10.2118/196056-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper we emphasize the duality of fluid sampling: (1) fluid characterization; to collect samples and measure pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) data that can be used to build and tune an equation of state (EOS) model, and (2) fluid initialization; to collect samples to estimate in-situ fluid compositions. It is hard, if not impossible, to obtain truly in-situ representative fluid samples in multi-fractured horizontal wells (MFHW). This paper explains why fluids measured in the lab may be significantly different from in-situ representative fluid samples, even if the fluid samples are collected shortly after the well is put online. The paper also suggests that practically all samples, in-situ representative or not, can and should be used to build a reliable EOS model.\n To make a comprehensive assessment of fluid sampling in tight unconventionals, reservoir fluids ranging from black oils to gas condensates have been studied. For a wide range of fluid systems, a compositional reservoir simulator has been used to assess two main scenarios: (1) an initially undersaturated (single-phase) fluid system, and (2) initially saturated (two-phase) fluid system. To quantify how collected surface samples change with time, three properties are studied as functions of time: (1) saturation pressure and type (dewpoint | bubblepoint), (2) producing gas/oil ratio (GOR), and (3) stock-tank oil (STO) API. Observations of how these three properties change with time is used to help explain why elevated saturation pressures, greater than the initial reservoir pressure, often can be observed.\n Rapid decline of the flowing bottomhole pressure (BHP | pwf), together with shut-in periods, makes it difficult to obtain in-situ representative samples in MFHW. For slightly undersaturated reservoirs, and saturated reservoirs, it may be impossible to obtain in-situ representative fluid samples because of the near-wellbore multiphase behavior. However, samples which are not in-situ representative can still be used to estimate original in-situ fluids using equilibrium contact mixing (ECM) procedures. In this paper, we propose two ECM methods that can either be carried out by physical measurements in a PVT lab or can be computed with a properly tuned EOS model.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196056-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper we emphasize the duality of fluid sampling: (1) fluid characterization; to collect samples and measure pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) data that can be used to build and tune an equation of state (EOS) model, and (2) fluid initialization; to collect samples to estimate in-situ fluid compositions. It is hard, if not impossible, to obtain truly in-situ representative fluid samples in multi-fractured horizontal wells (MFHW). This paper explains why fluids measured in the lab may be significantly different from in-situ representative fluid samples, even if the fluid samples are collected shortly after the well is put online. The paper also suggests that practically all samples, in-situ representative or not, can and should be used to build a reliable EOS model. To make a comprehensive assessment of fluid sampling in tight unconventionals, reservoir fluids ranging from black oils to gas condensates have been studied. For a wide range of fluid systems, a compositional reservoir simulator has been used to assess two main scenarios: (1) an initially undersaturated (single-phase) fluid system, and (2) initially saturated (two-phase) fluid system. To quantify how collected surface samples change with time, three properties are studied as functions of time: (1) saturation pressure and type (dewpoint | bubblepoint), (2) producing gas/oil ratio (GOR), and (3) stock-tank oil (STO) API. Observations of how these three properties change with time is used to help explain why elevated saturation pressures, greater than the initial reservoir pressure, often can be observed. Rapid decline of the flowing bottomhole pressure (BHP | pwf), together with shut-in periods, makes it difficult to obtain in-situ representative samples in MFHW. For slightly undersaturated reservoirs, and saturated reservoirs, it may be impossible to obtain in-situ representative fluid samples because of the near-wellbore multiphase behavior. However, samples which are not in-situ representative can still be used to estimate original in-situ fluids using equilibrium contact mixing (ECM) procedures. In this paper, we propose two ECM methods that can either be carried out by physical measurements in a PVT lab or can be computed with a properly tuned EOS model.
致密非常规油气流体取样
本文强调流体采样的对偶性:(1)流体表征;收集样品并测量压力/体积/温度(PVT)数据,这些数据可用于构建和调整状态方程(EOS)模型;收集样品以估计现场流体成分。在多裂缝水平井(MFHW)中获得真正具有原位代表性的流体样品是很困难的,如果不是不可能的话。本文解释了为什么在实验室测量的流体可能与现场代表性流体样品有显著不同,即使流体样品是在井投产后不久收集的。本文还提出,几乎所有的样本,无论是否具有原位代表性,都可以而且应该用于建立可靠的EOS模型。为了对致密非常规储层流体取样进行综合评价,研究了从黑色油到天然气凝析油的储层流体。对于各种流体系统,组成油藏模拟器被用来评估两种主要情况:(1)初始欠饱和(单相)流体系统,(2)初始饱和(两相)流体系统。为了量化收集到的表面样品随时间的变化情况,研究了三个性质作为时间的函数:(1)饱和压力和类型(露点|气泡点),(2)产气/油比(GOR),(3)储罐油API (STO)。对这三种性质随时间变化的观察有助于解释为什么经常可以观察到高于初始油藏压力的饱和压力升高。井底流动压力(BHP | pwf)的快速下降,加上关井期,使得MFHW很难获得具有代表性的原位样品。对于轻度欠饱和油藏和饱和油藏,由于近井多相特征,可能无法获得具有代表性的原位流体样品。然而,不具有原位代表性的样品仍然可以使用平衡接触混合(ECM)程序来估计原始的原位流体。在本文中,我们提出了两种ECM方法,它们可以在PVT实验室中通过物理测量进行,也可以通过适当调整的EOS模型进行计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信