Development and Evaluation of Two 3D-Simulated Practice Learning Environments

Q3 Social Sciences
Stephen Farrier, T. Connolly, N. Tsvetkova, Mario Soflano, Petros Papadopoulos
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Two 3D-Simulated Practice Learning Environments","authors":"Stephen Farrier, T. Connolly, N. Tsvetkova, Mario Soflano, Petros Papadopoulos","doi":"10.4018/ijvple.313038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the evaluation of two 3D simulated practice learning environments, Tiny Oaks and Play2Do, focused on supporting people working with children, families, and vulnerable people in special educational settings. Pre-test/post-test evaluation methodology was employed consisting of a questionnaire with 16 questions covering knowledge and understanding, professional practice, and transferable skills. Tiny Oaks had 530 participants pre-test and 423 post-test from six European countries, and results show a significant increase in learning across all questions. Play2Do had 318 participants pre-test and 301 participants post-test from the UK and Bulgaria, and again results show a significant increase in learning across all questions. The system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire was also used to measure the usability of the two environments, and usability was found to be excellent. Findings suggest that 3D simulated practice environments can provide a valuable learning experience and can provide practice learning scenarios that may be difficult to encounter in real-life.","PeriodicalId":53545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments","volume":"103 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijvple.313038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the evaluation of two 3D simulated practice learning environments, Tiny Oaks and Play2Do, focused on supporting people working with children, families, and vulnerable people in special educational settings. Pre-test/post-test evaluation methodology was employed consisting of a questionnaire with 16 questions covering knowledge and understanding, professional practice, and transferable skills. Tiny Oaks had 530 participants pre-test and 423 post-test from six European countries, and results show a significant increase in learning across all questions. Play2Do had 318 participants pre-test and 301 participants post-test from the UK and Bulgaria, and again results show a significant increase in learning across all questions. The system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire was also used to measure the usability of the two environments, and usability was found to be excellent. Findings suggest that 3D simulated practice environments can provide a valuable learning experience and can provide practice learning scenarios that may be difficult to encounter in real-life.
两种3d模拟实践学习环境的开发与评价
本文讨论了两个3D模拟实践学习环境,Tiny Oaks和Play2Do的评估,重点是支持在特殊教育环境中与儿童,家庭和弱势群体一起工作的人。采用测试前/测试后评估方法,包括16个问题的调查问卷,涵盖知识和理解,专业实践和可转移技能。Tiny Oaks有来自六个欧洲国家的530名参与者参加了前测试,423名参与者参加了后测试,结果显示,在所有问题上的学习都有显著提高。Play2Do有来自英国和保加利亚的318名参与者参加了前测试,301名参与者参加了后测试,结果再次显示,所有问题的学习效果都有显著提高。采用系统可用性量表(system usability scale, SUS)问卷对两种环境的可用性进行了测量,结果显示两种环境的可用性均为优秀。研究结果表明,3D模拟练习环境可以提供宝贵的学习经验,并可以提供在现实生活中可能难以遇到的练习学习场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信