Effects of feeding alfalfa hay in comparison to meadow hay on the gastric mucosa in adult Warmblood horses

V. Bäuerlein, C. Sabban, M. Venner, I. Vervuert
{"title":"Effects of feeding alfalfa hay in comparison to meadow hay on the gastric mucosa in adult Warmblood horses","authors":"V. Bäuerlein, C. Sabban, M. Venner, I. Vervuert","doi":"10.21836/pem20200105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) is a common health problem in horses and foals. Beside the importance of forage feeding for the gastric mucosa, results of studies targeting the specific effect of alfalfa on different gastric mucosal regions are controversial. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of the two forage types (1) meadow hay and (2) alfalfa hay with similar fiber length on different gastric mucosal regions in order to further clarify the effect of alfalfa hay on the equine gastric mucosa. It was hypothesized that feeding alfalfa hay will impair mucosal integrity of the pylorus and antrum pyloricum but may be a benefit for the squamous regions. In a randomized blinded prospective study with a cross-over design, 10 healthy adult warmblood horses were separated randomly into two groups each with five horses. Both groups were fed with 2 kg/100 kg BW/animal/day alfalfa hay or meadow hay in two feeding periods each 21 days long. A wash out period of 21 days was conducted between the feeding periods. Before and after feeding periods body condition score (BCS), body weight (BW), clinical health status, feces pH and particle size and gastroscopic findings were determined. Each region of the gastric mucosa was assessed and scored separately. Data such as BW, fecal pH and fecal particle size were analyzed for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilks test. BCS, gastroscopic findings and fecal pH were subjected to non-parametric statistical tests. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare the findings in gastric mucosal scores, BCS and fecal pH. The relative change in BW and fecal particle size were analyzed by one-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are presented as medians, 25th and 75th percentiles. Relative BW changes and fecal particle size are given as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Before starting the feeding trial, the prevalence of overall gastric mucosal lesions was 100 % with a median severity score of 1. After the feeding period, the median lesion score of the lesser curvature of the squamous region decreased significantly from a median of 1 to a median of 0 in the alfalfa group. The median score of 0 remained constant before and after feeding the meadow hay. Findings in the pyloric region did not differ significantly between the two feeding groups. We concluded that feeding alfalfa hay seems to have no detrimental effects on the mucosal integrity at the squamous gastric region in healthy adult horses. With respect to the glandular area, feeding alfalfa hay appears to be noncritical in healthy adult horses. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of feeding alfalfa hay in horses suffering from severe mucosal lesions at the antrum pyloricum or pylorus. Furthermore, the longer fecal particle size in horses fed alfalfa hay needs further elucidation.","PeriodicalId":19771,"journal":{"name":"Pferdeheilkunde Equine Medicine","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pferdeheilkunde Equine Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21836/pem20200105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) is a common health problem in horses and foals. Beside the importance of forage feeding for the gastric mucosa, results of studies targeting the specific effect of alfalfa on different gastric mucosal regions are controversial. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of the two forage types (1) meadow hay and (2) alfalfa hay with similar fiber length on different gastric mucosal regions in order to further clarify the effect of alfalfa hay on the equine gastric mucosa. It was hypothesized that feeding alfalfa hay will impair mucosal integrity of the pylorus and antrum pyloricum but may be a benefit for the squamous regions. In a randomized blinded prospective study with a cross-over design, 10 healthy adult warmblood horses were separated randomly into two groups each with five horses. Both groups were fed with 2 kg/100 kg BW/animal/day alfalfa hay or meadow hay in two feeding periods each 21 days long. A wash out period of 21 days was conducted between the feeding periods. Before and after feeding periods body condition score (BCS), body weight (BW), clinical health status, feces pH and particle size and gastroscopic findings were determined. Each region of the gastric mucosa was assessed and scored separately. Data such as BW, fecal pH and fecal particle size were analyzed for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilks test. BCS, gastroscopic findings and fecal pH were subjected to non-parametric statistical tests. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare the findings in gastric mucosal scores, BCS and fecal pH. The relative change in BW and fecal particle size were analyzed by one-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data are presented as medians, 25th and 75th percentiles. Relative BW changes and fecal particle size are given as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Before starting the feeding trial, the prevalence of overall gastric mucosal lesions was 100 % with a median severity score of 1. After the feeding period, the median lesion score of the lesser curvature of the squamous region decreased significantly from a median of 1 to a median of 0 in the alfalfa group. The median score of 0 remained constant before and after feeding the meadow hay. Findings in the pyloric region did not differ significantly between the two feeding groups. We concluded that feeding alfalfa hay seems to have no detrimental effects on the mucosal integrity at the squamous gastric region in healthy adult horses. With respect to the glandular area, feeding alfalfa hay appears to be noncritical in healthy adult horses. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of feeding alfalfa hay in horses suffering from severe mucosal lesions at the antrum pyloricum or pylorus. Furthermore, the longer fecal particle size in horses fed alfalfa hay needs further elucidation.
饲喂苜蓿干草与草甸干草对成年温血马胃黏膜的影响
马胃溃疡综合征(EGUS)是马和马驹常见的健康问题。除了饲料喂养对胃粘膜的重要性外,针对苜蓿对胃粘膜不同区域的特异性作用的研究结果也存在争议。本研究的目的是确定纤维长度相近的两种饲料类型(1)草甸干草和(2)苜蓿干草对马胃粘膜不同区域的影响,以进一步阐明苜蓿干草对马胃粘膜的影响。据推测,饲喂苜蓿干草会损害幽门和幽门腔的粘膜完整性,但可能对鳞状区域有益。在一项交叉设计的随机盲法前瞻性研究中,将10匹健康成年温血马随机分为两组,每组5匹马。两组均饲喂2 kg/100 kg体重/d的苜蓿干草或草甸干草,分2个饲喂期,每个饲喂期21 d。两次饲喂之间有21 d的洗净期。测定饲喂期前后体况评分(BCS)、体重(BW)、临床健康状况、粪便pH值、颗粒大小及胃镜检查结果。对胃粘膜的各个区域分别进行评估和评分。采用Shapiro-Wilks检验分析体重、粪便pH、粪便粒径等数据是否符合正态分布。BCS、胃镜检查结果和粪便pH值进行非参数统计检验。采用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和Wilcoxon检验比较胃粘膜评分、BCS和粪便ph的变化。采用单因子方差分析(ANOVA)分析体重和粪便颗粒大小的相对变化。数据以中位数、25和75百分位数表示。相对体重变化和粪便颗粒大小以平均值±标准差(SD)给出。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。在开始喂养试验之前,胃粘膜病变的总体发生率为100%,严重程度评分中位数为1。饲喂期结束后,苜蓿组鳞状区小曲率病变评分中位数从1分显著下降到0分。饲喂草甸干草前后的中位数得分保持不变。两组之间幽门区域的检查结果无显著差异。我们得出的结论是,饲喂苜蓿干草似乎对健康成年马胃鳞状区粘膜完整性没有有害影响。关于腺区,喂养苜蓿干草似乎对健康成年马无关紧要。需要进一步的研究来调查饲喂苜蓿干草对患有幽门或幽门严重粘膜病变的马的影响。此外,饲喂苜蓿干草的马粪便颗粒尺寸较长,需要进一步阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信