An assessment of isometric muscle strength and the hamstring: Quadriceps ratio among males trained with free weights vs. machines

IF 0.7 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Geferson Honorato Da Silva, A. Maior
{"title":"An assessment of isometric muscle strength and the hamstring: Quadriceps ratio among males trained with free weights vs. machines","authors":"Geferson Honorato Da Silva, A. Maior","doi":"10.29359/bjhpa.14.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the isometric muscle strength (IMS) of the knee extensors and flexors, bilateral asymmetry (BA) and the hamstring: quadriceps ratio (H:Q ratio) between the dominant leg (DL) vs. the non-dominant leg (NDL) of males trained with free-weights vs. machines. Material and Methods: Thirty males were recruited and separated into two groups: Free-weights (n = 15) and Machines (n = 15) groups. All study participants performed the IMS testing for knee extensors and flexors in the DL and NDL using a commercially available load cell. The highest value obtained from the three trials was used for statistical analysis. Results: The IMS of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles for DL and NDL showed a significant increase in the Free-weight group when compared to the Machine group. In addition, a significant difference (p <.03) in the IMS of hamstring muscles between DL vs. NDL was observed in the Machine group. The H:Q ratio on DL (p < .002) and NDL (p < .01) was significantly higher in the Free-weight group. Conclusion: This study showed better isometric muscle strength of the thigh (hamstring and quadriceps) and the H:Q ratio in males trained with free weights. In addition, males trained with machines showed a bilateral asymmetry of the hamstring muscles and a lower H:Q ratio – consequently, a higher risk of knee injuries.","PeriodicalId":43798,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.14.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the isometric muscle strength (IMS) of the knee extensors and flexors, bilateral asymmetry (BA) and the hamstring: quadriceps ratio (H:Q ratio) between the dominant leg (DL) vs. the non-dominant leg (NDL) of males trained with free-weights vs. machines. Material and Methods: Thirty males were recruited and separated into two groups: Free-weights (n = 15) and Machines (n = 15) groups. All study participants performed the IMS testing for knee extensors and flexors in the DL and NDL using a commercially available load cell. The highest value obtained from the three trials was used for statistical analysis. Results: The IMS of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles for DL and NDL showed a significant increase in the Free-weight group when compared to the Machine group. In addition, a significant difference (p <.03) in the IMS of hamstring muscles between DL vs. NDL was observed in the Machine group. The H:Q ratio on DL (p < .002) and NDL (p < .01) was significantly higher in the Free-weight group. Conclusion: This study showed better isometric muscle strength of the thigh (hamstring and quadriceps) and the H:Q ratio in males trained with free weights. In addition, males trained with machines showed a bilateral asymmetry of the hamstring muscles and a lower H:Q ratio – consequently, a higher risk of knee injuries.
评估等长肌肉力量和腿筋:股四头肌比例的男性训练与自由重量与机器
介绍。本研究的目的是评估用自由举重和机器训练的男性,膝关节伸屈肌的等长肌力(IMS)、双侧不对称(BA)和优势腿(DL)与非优势腿(NDL)之间的腘绳肌:股四头肌比率(H:Q ratio)。材料与方法:招募30名男性,将其分为两组:自由举重组(n = 15)和器械组(n = 15)。所有研究参与者都使用市售称重传感器对DL和NDL的膝关节伸肌和屈肌进行了IMS测试。三次试验所得的最高值用于统计分析。结果:与机器组相比,自由重量组DL和NDL的股四头肌和腘绳肌IMS明显增加。此外,Machine组DL组与NDL组腘绳肌IMS有显著差异(p <.03)。自由体重组DL和NDL的H:Q比(p < 0.002)和NDL的H:Q比(p < 0.01)显著升高。结论:本研究表明,在进行自由举重训练的男性中,大腿(腿筋和股四头肌)的等长肌肉力量和H:Q比更好。此外,用机器训练的男性腿筋肌肉两侧不对称,H:Q比更低,因此膝盖受伤的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信